基于原生质体的谷子CRISPR/Cas9 基因编辑系统优化

doi:10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2022.01.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了优化和筛选谷子中高效的CRISPR/Cas9（Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISRP‐associated nuclease 9）基因编辑系统，针对谷子八氢番茄红素脱氢酶基因（SiPDS）设计6种gRNA（gRNA1—gRNA2针对外显子1，gRNA3—gRNA6针对外显子12），构建多种CRISPR/Cas9基因编辑系统，通过聚乙二醇（PEG）介导的方法转入谷子原生质体中，然后利用开发的大规模平行测序技术快速检测它们对SiPDS 的突变效率。结果表明，采用7 d谷子黄化苗幼茎建立的原生质体转化系统的转化效率较高，为50.44%～57.36%。将Super启动子（SP）、谷子内源的泛素启动子（Ubi）分别驱动Cas9 基因的基因编辑系统转入谷子原生质体中，发现两者对SiPDS 基因的突变效率分别为0.5%、5.5%。随后采用Ubi启动子驱动Cas9 基因，比较单一gRNA、双gRNA和tRNA结构的基因编辑系统对SiPDS 基因的突变效率，发现双gRNA 基因编辑系统Ubi-dgRNAE1和Ubi-dgRNAE12的突变效率分别较单一gRNA基因编辑系统提高了1.66倍和1.11倍；tRNA基因编辑系统Ubi-tRNA的突变效率较单一gRNA基因编辑系统提高了5.87倍，为51.24%，且Ubi-tRNA 可同时针对多个位点进行编辑，其多位点突变频率为3.23%。比较gRNA3、gRNA4、gRNA5体外转录产物分别与Cas9蛋白混合制成的核糖核蛋白（RNP）复合物的体外切割活性，发现RNP-gRNA5复合物体外切割活性最高，其对SiPDS 基因的突变效率是2.0%，并且引起的突变类型主要为小于3 bp的缺失。

关键词: 基因编辑, CRISPR/Cas9, tRNA, RNP, 谷子, 原生质体

Abstract: To optimize and screen efficient genome editing systems in millet（Setaria italica），multiple CRISPR/Cas9（clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISRP‐associated nuclease 9）genome editing systems were constructed with six kinds of gRNAs designed for phytoene desaturase（SiPDS） gene（gRNA1—gRNA2 for exon 1，gRNA3—gRNA6 for exon 12），and transformed into protoplasts of millet by polyethylene glycol‐mediated method. Then the mutation efficiency against SiPDS gene was rapidly detected by large‐scale parallel sequencing. The results showed that the protoplast transformation system established by the young stems of 7 day‐old millet etiolated seedlings had high transformation efficiency from 50. 44% to 57. 36%. Using this method，the gene editing systems with Cas9 gene driven by Super and Ubi promoters were transferred into millet protoplasts，the mutation efficiencies of SiPDS gene were 0. 5% and 5. 5% respectively. Thus，the Cas9 gene of gene editing systems with single gRNA，double gRNA or tRNA cassettes were driven by Ubi promoter，and mutation efficiency of SiPDS gene induced by these systems was compared. It was found that the mutation efficiencies of gene editing system with double gRNA cassettes such as Ubi‐dgRNAE1 and Ubi‐dgRNAE12 were 1. 66 and 1. 11 times higher than that with single gRNA system. The mutation efficiency induced by tRNA‐based system Ubi‐tRNA was 51. 24%，which was 5. 87 times higher than that with single gRNA system. Moreover，Ubi‐tRNA could simultaneously edit multiple sites of SiPDS gene，the multi‐site mutation frequency was 3. 23%. The cleavage activities in vitro of ribonucleoprotein（RNP）complexes which were mixture of gRNA3，gRNA4 or gRNA5 transcripts with Cas9 protein respectively were compared，it was found that RNP‐gRNA5 complex had the highest cleavage activity in vitro，the mutation efficiency of SiPDS gene was 2. 0%，and the dominant mutation type was deletion less than 3 bp.

Key words: Genome editing, CRISPR/Cas9, tRNA, RNP, Setaria italica, Protoplast

中图分类号:

S515

刘光宇, 徐晓静, 夏科科, 孙海汐, 陶月如, 崔震, 顾颖. 基于原生质体的谷子CRISPR/Cas9 基因编辑系统优化[J]. 河南农业科学, 2022, 51(1): 34-42.

LIU Guangyu, XU Xiaojing, XIA Keke, SUN Haixi, TAO Yueru, CUI Zhen, GU Ying. Optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing Systems in Protoplasts of Setaria italica[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 51(1): 34-42.

图/表 7

参考文献

［1］LATA C，GUPTA S，PRASAD M.Foxtail millet：A model crop for genetic and genomic studies in bioenergy
grasses［J］.Critical Reviews in Biotechnology，2013，33（3）：328‐343.
［2］MUTHAMILARASAN M，DHAKA A，YADAV R，et al.Exploration of millet models for developing nutrient rich graminaceous crops［J］.Plant Science，2015，242：89‐97.
［3］DOUST A N，KELLOGG E A，DEVOS K M，et al.Foxtail millet：A sequence‐driven grass model system［J］.Plant Physiology，2009，149（1）：137‐141.
［4］WANG J，ZHANG G，LIU X，et al.Genome sequence of foxtail millet（Setaria italica） provides insights into
grass evolution and biofuel potential ［J］.Nature Biotechnology，2012，30（6）：549‐554.
［5］刘颖慧，于静娟，赵倩，等.根癌农杆菌介导谷子的遗传转化［J］.农业生物技术学报，2005，13（1）：32‐37.
LIU Y H，YU J J，ZHAO Q，et al.Genetic transformation of millet（Setaria italica ）by Agrobacterium‐mediated［J］.Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology，2005，13（1）：32‐37.
［6］WANG M Z，PAN Y L，LI C，et al.Culturing of immature inflorescences and Agrobacterium‐mediated transformation of foxtail millet（Setaria italica）［J］.African Journal of Biotechnology，2011，10（73）：16466‐16479.
［7］CEASAR S A，BAKER A，IGNACIMUTHU S.Functional characterization of the PHT1 family transporters of foxtail
millet with development of a novel Agrobacterium‐mediated transformation procedure［J］.Scientific Reports，2017，7（1）：14064.
［8］SANTOS C M，ROMEIRO D，SILVA J P，et al.An improved protocol for efficient transformation and regeneration of Setaria italica［J］.Plant Cell Reports，2020，39（4）：501‐510.
［9］JINEK M，CHYLINSKI K，FONFARA I，et al.A programmable dual‐RNA‐guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity［J］.Science，2012，337：816‐822.
［10］CHEN K，WANG Y，ZHANG R，et al.CRISPR/Cas genome editing and precision plant breeding in agriculture［J］.Annual Review of Plant Biology，2019，70：667‐697.
［11］MAO Y，ZHANG H，XU N，et al.Application of the CRISPR‐Cas system for efficient genome engineering in plants［J］.Molecular Plant，2013，6（6）：2008‐2011.
［12］MIAO J，GUO D，ZHANG J，et al.Targeted mutagenesis in rice using CRISPR‐Cas system［J］.Cell Research，2013，23（10）：1233‐1236.
［13］ZHOU H，LIU B，WEEKS D P，et al.Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes induced by CRISPR/Cas9 in rice［J］.Nucleic Acids Research，2014，42（17）：10903‐10914.
［14］MA X，ZHANG Q，ZHU Q，et al.A robust CRISPR/Cas9 system for convenient，high‐efficiency multiplex genome editing in monocot and dicot plants［J］.Molecular Plant，2015，8（8）：1274‐1284.
［15］SVITASHEV S，YOUNG J K，SCHWARTZ C，et al.Targeted mutagenesis，precise gene editing，and site‐specific gene insertion in maize using Cas9 and guide RNA［J］.Plant Physiology，2015，169（2）：931‐945.
［16］WANG Y，CHENG X，SHAN Q，et al.Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew［J］.Nature Biotechnology，2014，32（9）：947‐951.
［17］ZHAO Y，ZHANG C，LIU W，et al.An alternative strategy for targeted gene replacement in plants using a dual‐sgRNA/Cas9 design［J］.Scientific Reports，2016，6：23890.
［18］KLIMEK‐CHODACKA M，OLESZKIEWICZ T，LOWDER L G，et al.Efficient CRISPR/Cas9‐based genome editing in carrot cells［J］.Plant Cell Reports，2018，37（4）：575‐586.
［19］WANG Z， WANG S， LI D， et al.Optimized paired‐sgRNA/Cas9 cloning and expression cassette triggers high‐efficiency multiplex genome editing in kiwifruit［J］.Plant Biotechnology Journal，2018，16（8）：1424‐1433.
［20］XIE K，MINKENBERG B，YANG Y，et al.Boosting CRISPR/Cas9 multiplex editing capability with the endogenous tRNA processing system contents of supporting information［J］.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America，2015，112（11）：3570‐3575.
［21］XIE C，XU Y，WAN J.Crop genome editing：A way to breeding by design［J］.Crop Journal，2020，8（3）：379‐383.
［22］LIN C S，HSU C T，YANG L H，et al.Application of protoplast technology to CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis：From single‐cell mutation detection to mutant plant regeneration［J］.Plant Biotechnology Journal，2018，16（7）：1295‐1310.
［23］CHENG Z，SUN Y，YANG S，et al.Establishing in planta haploid inducer line by edited SiMTL in foxtail millet （Setaria italica）［J］.Plant Biotechnology Journal，2021，19（6）：1089‐1091.
［24］WOO J W，KIM J，KWON S I，et al.DNA‐free genome editing in plants with preassembled CRISPR‐Cas9 ribonucleoproteins［J］.Nature Biotechnology，2015，33（11）：1162‐1164.
［25］SVITASHEV S，SCHWARTZ C，LENDERTS B，et al.Genome editing in maize directed by CRISPR‐Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes［J］.Nature Communications，2016，7：13274.
［26］LIANG Z，CHEN K，LI T，et al.Efficient DNA‐free genome editing of bread wheat using CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes［J］.Nature Communications，2017，8：14261.
［27］PARK J，CHOI S，PARK S，et al.DNA‐free genome editing via ribonucleoprotein（RNP） delivery of CRISPR/Cas in lettuce［J］.Methods in Molecular Biology，2019，1917：337‐354.
［28］ZHANG K，RABOANATAHIRY N，ZHU B，et al.Progress in genome editing technology and its application in plants［J］.Frontiers in Plant Science，2017，8：177.
［29］AYPAR U.Genome editing as a tool toward better functional understanding of variants identified by next‐generation sequencing［J］.Clinical Chemistry，2015，61（3）：564‐565.
［30］CANVER M C，HAEUSSLER M，BAUER D E，et al.Integrated design，execution，and analysis of arrayed and pooled CRISPR genome‐editing experiments［J］.Nature Protocols，2018，13（5）：946‐986.
［31］WEISS T，WANG C，KANG X，et al.Optimization of multiplexed CRISPR/Cas9 system for highly efficient genome editing in Setaria viridis［J］.Plant Journal，2020，104（3）：828‐838.
［32］ZHANG Y，SU J，DUAN S，et al.A highly efficient rice green tissue protoplast system for transient gene expression and studying light/chloroplast‐related processes［J］.Plant Methods，2011，7（1）：30.
［33］LIANG Z，CHEN K，ZHANG Y，et al.Genome editing of bread wheat using biolistic delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 in vitro transcripts or ribonucleoproteins［J］.Nature Protocols，2018，13（3）：413‐430.
［34］HUANG X，WANG Y，XU J，et al.Development of multiplex genome editing toolkits for citrus with high efficacy in biallelic and homozygous mutations［J］.Plant Molecular Biology，2020，104（3）：297‐307.
［35］XIANG F，XIA G，ZHI D，et al.Regeneration of somatic hybrids in relation to the nuclear and cytoplasmic genomes of wheat and Setaria italica［J］.Genome，2004，47（4）：680‐688.
［36］LIU X，TANG S，JIA G，et al.The C‐terminal motif of SiAGO1b is required for the regulation of growth，development and stress responses in foxtail millet（Setaria italica（L.）P.Beauv）［J］.Journal of Experimental Botany，2016，67（11）：3237‐3249.

[1]	李君霞, 马小倩, 代书桃, 秦娜, 宋迎辉, 朱灿灿, 刘海霞, 金松灿. 谷子品质性状研究进展[J]. 河南农业科学, 2023, 52(9): 14-23.
[2]	朱灿灿, 付森杰, 秦娜, 王春义, 代书桃, 宋迎辉, 魏昕, 李君霞. 磷肥施用深度对谷子根系分布、氮素吸收利用和产量的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2023, 52(12): 22-30.
[3]	张向歌, 朱雅婧, 陆莉莉, 宋万献, 张新友, 胡海燕, 于美琴, 李居政, 王会伟. 油莎豆原生质体制备的组织筛选及条件优化[J]. 河南农业科学, 2023, 52(12): 49-56.
[4]	张红涛, 罗一铭, 谭联, 杨加蓬, 王宇. 基于迁移学习和残差网络的谷子病害识别研究[J]. 河南农业科学, 2023, 52(12): 162-171.
[5]	李艳, 陈艳艳, 华夏, 方宇辉, 王玉民, 巩晨, 齐学礼, 胡琳. 利用CRISPR/Cas9技术创制小麦耐低肥Taaap3突变体[J]. 河南农业科学, 2023, 52(11): 33-41.
[6]	王伟东, 滕蔓, 郑鹿平, 刘金玲, 张文凯, 李林燕, 张志会, 樊剑鸣, 罗俊. miR-M11 基因编辑对马立克病病毒体外复制的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2023, 52(1): 134-143.
[7]	罗世武, 李凯, 来幸樑, 程炳文. 不同种类地膜覆盖对土壤水温、谷子生长及产量的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2022, 51(7): 42-50.
[8]	冯链, 田翔, 乔治军, 王海岗. 谷子农艺性状与蛋白质含量相关性分析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2022, 51(6): 43-53.
[9]	焦耀磊, 王春生, 曲硕, 孙珊珊, 朱婷婷, 赵贺, 王丕武. CRISPR/Cas9 技术在作物遗传育种中的应用进展[J]. 河南农业科学, 2021, 50(7): 1-7.
[10]	李君霞, 樊永强, 代书桃, 朱灿灿, 韩燕丽, 秦娜, 王彦辉, 宋迎辉. 播期对不同谷子品种干物质积累、转运和产量的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2021, 50(7): 39-47.
[11]	李子文, 刘言, 吕梦洋, 高凯莉, 张海荣. 基于CRISPR-Cas9的拟南芥基因编辑后代鉴定技术的优化[J]. 河南农业科学, 2021, 50(4): 17-21.
[12]	相吉山, 张恒儒, 于佳东, 索良喜, 郭普丞, 李岩, 韩奕, 杜鹤恬, 马静泽, 陈佳宁. 495个不同产区谷子品种（系）在赤峰地区的农艺性状分析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2020, 49(8): 16-30.
[13]	李君霞, 代书桃, 陈宇翔, 朱灿灿, 秦娜, 宋迎辉, 王春义, 芮战许, 梁秋芳. 种植密度对夏谷顶三叶和穗部性状的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2020, 49(7): 25-34.
[14]	李任建, 申哲源, 李旭凯, 韩渊怀, 张宝俊. 谷子NBS-LRR类基因家族全基因组鉴定及表达分析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2020, 49(2): 34-43.
[15]	秦娜，马春业，朱灿灿，代书桃，宋迎辉，王春义，芮战许，李君霞. 谷子氮高效基因型筛选及相关特性分析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2019, 48(5): 22-29.