Effects of Biogas Slurry Ratio under Regulated Deficit Irrigation on Tomato Growth，Yield，and Quality

doi:10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2026.09.013

Abstract

Abstract: To investigate the effects of biogas slurry ratio under deficit irrigation on tomato growth，yield and quality，this study conducted a greenhouse tomato planting experiment from October 2024 to April 2025. Conventional drip irrigation practices employed by farmers served as the control（CK），while nine deficit irrigation and biogas slurry ratio treatments（T1—T9）were established under indirect subsurface drip irrigation.At different growth stages，tomato of each treatment was applied with different proportions of biogas slurry，specifically，T1（1∶4 for the growth period），T2（1∶4 for seedling stage，1∶6 for flowering and fruiting stage，1∶8 for fruit maturing，the same below），T3（1∶4，1∶8，1∶6），T4（1∶6 for the whole growth period），T5（ 1∶6，1∶4，1∶8），T6（ 1∶6，1∶8，1∶4），T7（1∶8 for the whole growth period），T8（ 1∶8，1∶4，1∶6），T9 （1∶8，1∶6，1∶4）. The physiological，ecological，yield，and quality indicators of tomatoes under different treatments were measured to explore their response patterns，and the TOPSIS method was employed to evaluate and analyze the comprehensive benefits of tomato cultivation. The results indicated that at the end of the growth period，T7 treatment exhibited the highest plant height and stem diameter，measuring 1.83 m and 18.70 mm，respectively；T1 treatment showed the lowest plant height，while T9 treatment exhibited the lowest stem diameter.The T3 treatment achieved the largest leaf area，and T4 treatment demonstrated the most favorable leaf chlorophyll content. Across the seedling stage，flowering‑fruiting stage，and ripening stage，T4，T6，and T1 treatments showed the highest total dry matter accumulation，respectively.T4 treatment yielded the highest tomato production（4.15 kg/plant），followed by T5 treatment（3.61 kg/plant）.T2 and T5 treatments achieved the highest soluble sugar content，while T6 treatment exhibited the highest titratable acidity and lycopene contents.The T4 treatment had the highest soluble solids，vitamin C，and soluble protein contents.The comprehensive benefit evaluation results showed that T4 was the optimal treatment in the experiment.

Key words: Tomato, Biogas slurry ratio, Regulated deficit irrigation, Indirect subsurface drip irrigation, Growth stage, Growth, Yield, Quality

摘要： 为探索调亏灌溉下沼液配比对番茄生长、产量和品质的影响，以温室番茄为对象，于2024年10月至2025年4月开展温室种植试验，以农户常规滴灌为对照（CK），另设9个调亏灌溉+沼液配比处理（T1—T9），采用间接地下滴灌技术，各处理番茄在不同生育时期灌溉不同体积比沼液，即T1（全生育期1∶4）、T2（苗期1：4、开花坐果期1∶6、果实成熟期1∶8，生育时期顺序下同）、T3（1∶4、1∶8、1∶6）、T4（全生育期1∶6）、T5（1∶6、1∶4、1∶8）、T6（1∶6、1∶8、1∶4）、T7（全生育期1∶8）、T8（1∶8、1∶4、1∶6）、T9（1∶8、1∶6、1∶4）。通过测定各处理番茄的生理生态、产量和品质指标，探求其响应规律，并采用TOPSIS法对番茄种植综合效益进行评价分析。结果表明，生育末期番茄株高和茎粗均以T7处理最高，分别为1.83 m和18.70 mm，T1处理株高最小，T9处理茎粗最小；T3处理能够获得最大的叶面积，T4处理能够获得最理想的叶片叶绿素含量；番茄苗期、开花坐果期、果实成熟期末分别以T4、T6、T1处理总干物质积累量最大；T4处理产量最高（4.15 kg/株），T5处理次之（3.61 kg/株）；T2处理和T5处理获得了最高的可溶性糖含量，可滴定酸及番茄红素含量均以T6处理最高，T4处理可溶性固形物、维生素C和可溶性蛋白含量最高。综合效益评价结果显示，T4为试验最优处理。

关键词: 番茄, 沼液配比, 调亏灌溉, 间接地下滴灌, 生育时期, 生长, 产量, 品质

CLC Number:

Wang Chunxia, Du Yongping, Hou Xiongfei, Jin Mingzhi, Mao Yue, Yang Yun, Zheng Jian. Effects of Biogas Slurry Ratio under Regulated Deficit Irrigation on Tomato Growth，Yield，and Quality[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(9): 137-147.

王春霞, 杜永平, 侯雄飞, 金明智, 毛岳, 杨赟, 郑健. 调亏灌溉下沼液配比对番茄生长、产量和品质的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2026, 55(9): 137-147.

Figures/Tables 10

References

［1］农业农村部农业生态与资源保护总站. 循环发展助力农业绿色转型［R］. 北京：农业农村部，2025.

General Station of Agro‑Ecology and Resource Protection，Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs.Circular development facilitating agricultural green transformation［R］. Beijing：Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs，2025.

［2］刘克锋，高程达，韩敏，等. 牛沼液净化及利用［M］. 北京：气象出版社，2016.

Liu K F，Gao C D，Han M，et al. Purification and utilization of biogas slurry from cattle［M］. Beijing：China Meteorological Press，2016.

［3］毛正荣，王宏航，童文彬，等. 沼液还田消纳的效应及其对策［J］. 浙江农业科学，2019，60（10）：1898‑1902.

Mao Z R，Wang H H，Tong W B，et al. Effect and countermeasures of disposition of biogas slurry by returning to field［J］. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences，2019，60（10）：1898‑1902.

［4］李萍，蒋滔，陈云跃，等. 沼液灌溉对作物生长·土壤质量的影响［J］. 安徽农业科学，2013，41（4）：1501‑1503.

Li P，Jiang T，Chen Y Y，et al. Effect of utilization of biogas slurry on crop growth and soil quality［J］. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences， 2013， 41 （4）：1501‑1503.

［5］武继承，潘晓莹，杨永辉，等. 长期施用沼液对土壤养分含量和酶活性的影响［J］. 河南农业科学，2021，50（7）：76‑86.

Wu J C，Pan X Y，Yang Y H，et al. Effects of long‑term application of biogas slurry on soil nutrient content and enzyme activity［J］. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences，2021，50（7）：76‑86.

［6］闫六英，张纪涛，刘化涛，等. 沼液替代化肥对甘蓝产量、土壤养分和细菌群落结构的影响［J］. 中国蔬菜，2025（7）：101‑108.

Yan L Y，Zhang J T，Liu H T，et al. Effects of combined biogas slurry with chemical fertilizer on yield of cabbage，soil nutrient content and bacterial community ［J］. China Vegetables，2025（7）：101‑108.

［7］王旭，孙兆军，何俊，等. 滴灌施沼液改良甘肃盐碱地的效果研究［J］. 中国农村水利水电，2018（3）：55‑58.

Wang X，Sun Z J，He J，et al. Research on the effect of drip irrigation of biogas slurry improved alkaline‑saline

soil in Gansu［J］. China Rural Water and Hydropower，2018（3）：55‑58.

［8］刘莎，胡雨彤，赵汀葳，等. 沼液对番茄生长和土壤细菌群落及功能的影响［J］. 中国农业大学学报，2026，31（4）：83‑96.
Liu S，Hu Y T，Zhao T W，et al. Effects of biogas slurry application on tomato growth and soil bacterial community and function［J］. Journal of China Agricultural University，2026，31（4）：83‑96.

［9］刘丰玲，马东辉，刘天宏. 喷施沼液对小麦产量、品质和病虫害防治的影响［J］. 中国沼气，2009，27（6）：39‑41.
Liu F L，Ma D H，Liu T H. Effects of spraying biogas slurry on wheat yield，quality and pest control［J］. China Biogas，2009，27（6）：39‑41.

［10］陈钟佃，郭庆，吴飞龙，等. 猪粪沼液对玉米产量及土壤理化性状的影响研究［J］. 中国沼气，2023，41（6）：55‑61.
Chen Z D，Guo Q，Wu F L，et al. Effects of pig manure biogas slurry on corn yield and soil physical and chemical properties［J］. China Biogas，2023，41（6）：55‑61.

［11］郑健，宿智鹏，刘俊彦，等. 基于养分平衡原理的温室番茄沼液替代氮肥适宜模式及评价［J］. 中国农业大学学报，2024，29（2）：77‑90.
Zheng J，Su Z P，Liu J Y，et al. Suitable model and evaluation of nitrogen fertilizer replacement by greenhouse tomato digestate based on nutrient balance principle［J］. Journal of China Agricultural University，2024，29（2）：77‑90.

［12］姚莉，黄耀蓉，周婷，等. 沼液部分替代化肥对水稻产量、品质及紫色土土壤性质的影响［J］. 中国土壤与肥料，2025（11）：165‑173.
Yao L，Huang Y R，Zhou T，et al. Effect of partial substitution of chemical fertilizer with biogas slurry on rice yield，quality and soil properties of purple soil［J］.Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China，2025（11）：165‑173.

［13］Carrijo D R，Lundy M E，Linquist B A. Rice yields and water use under alternate wetting and drying irrigation：
a meta‑analysis［J］. Field Crops Research，2017，203：173‑180.

［14］史文娟，胡笑涛，康绍忠. 干旱缺水条件下作物调亏灌溉技术研究状况与展望［J］. 干旱地区农业研究，1998（2）：87‑91.
Shi W J，Hu X T，Kang S Z. The status quo and prospect of regulated deficit irrigation technique in water stress conditions［J］. Agricultural Reseach in the Arid Areas，1998（2）：87‑91.

［15］李明慧，张子敬. 半干旱区调亏灌溉与地面和地下滴灌相结合的节水策略［J］. 河南水利与南水北调，2024，53（11）：20‑21.
Li M H，Zhang Z J. Water‑saving strategies of deficit irrigation with surface and subsurface drip irrigation systems in semi‑arid region［J］. Henan Water Resources and South‑to‑North Water Diversion，2024，53（11）：20‑21.

［16］祁娟霞. 不同灌水量和灌水频率对番茄生长发育及品质的影响研究［D］. 银川：宁夏大学，2017.
Qi J X. Effects of different irrigation and irrigation frequency on growth and quality of tomato［D］.Yinchuan：Ningxia University，2017.

［17］刘聪，宫彬彬，高洪波，等. 基于蒸发皿蒸发量的椰糠盆栽番茄适宜灌溉量估算与试验［J］. 农业工程学报，2022，38（11）：117‑124.
Liu C，Gong B B，Gao H B，et al. Estimation and experiment of the suitable irrigation amount of potted tomatoes with coconut bran using pan evaporation［J］.Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering，2022，38（11）：117‑124.

［18］赵银平，孙利萍，史亮，等. 水分亏缺对拱棚水果番茄产量及品质的影响［J］. 耕作与栽培，2024，44（4）：78‑80.
Zhao Y P，Sun L P，Shi L，et al. The effect of water deficiency on the yield and quality of fruit tomatoes in arched sheds［J］. Tillage and Cultivation，2024，44（4）：78‑80.

［19］韩玉薪，杨福鑫，岳焕芳，等. 膜下滴灌灌水控制下设施番茄品质和水分利用效率分析［J］. 北方园艺，2023（18）：43‑53.
Han Y X，Yang F X，Yue H F，et al. Analysis of tomato quality and water use efficiency of facilities under the control of submembrane drip irrigation water［J］. Northern Horticulture，2023（18）：43‑53.

［20］刘钧庆. 调亏灌溉滴灌核桃树根区土壤水分模拟及生长特性研究［D］. 乌鲁木齐：新疆农业大学，2023.
Liu J Q. Study on soil moisture simulation and growth characteristics in the root zone of drip irrigation walnut trees under deficit irrigation［D］. Urumqi：Xinjiang Agricultural University，2023.

［21］Yang H，Du T，Qiu R，et al. Improved water use efficiency and fruit quality of greenhouse crops under regulated deficit irrigation in northwest China［J］.Agricultural Water Management，2017，179：193‑204.

［22］Ju Y L，Liu M，Tu T Y，et al. Effect of regulated deficit irrigation on fatty acids and their derived volatiles in ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ grapes and wines of Ningxia，China［J］. Food Chemistry，2018，245：667‑675.

［23］Coyago‑Cruz E，Meléndez‑Martínez A J，Moriana A，et al. Yield response to regulated deficit irrigation of greenhouse cherry tomatoes［J］. Agricultural Water Management，2019，213：212‑221.

［24］赵伟霞，张振华，蔡焕杰. 间接地下滴灌导水装置规格参数模型［J］. 水利学报，2009，40（3）：355‑363.
Zhao W X，Zhang Z H，Cai H J. Parameter model of water‑conducting device specification for indirect subsurface drip irrigation［J］. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering，2009，40（3）：355‑363.

［25］杨芳欣，张雅静，张向前，等. 北方农牧交错区滴灌梯度对玉米吐丝期光合特征及干物质积累的影响［J］. 山西农业科学，2025，53（1）：55‑63.
Yang F X，Zhang Y J，Zhang X Q，et al. Impact of drip irrigation gradient on photosynthetic characteristics and dry matter accumulation of maize at tasseling‑silking stage in northern agro‑pastoral ecotone ［J］. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences，2025，53（1）：55‑63.

［26］王志典，马东辉. 沼液间接地下滴灌对红提葡萄产量和品质的影响［J］. 安徽农学通报，2018，24（5）：46‑47.
Wang Z D，Ma D H. Effect of biogas slurry indirect subsurface drip irrigation on yield and quality of red grape［J］. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin，2018，24 （5）：46‑47.

［27］曹睿，贾生海，赵霞，等. 间接地下滴灌土壤水分运移规律研究［J］. 水利规划与设计，2022（2）：51‑54.
Cao R，Jia S H，Zhao X，et al. Study on soil water movement law of indirect underground drip irrigation［J］.Water Resources Planning and Design，2022（2）：51‑54.

［28］谢恒星，蔡焕杰，张振华. 间接地下滴灌对温室甜瓜植株性状、品质和产量的影响［J］. 灌溉排水学报，2010，29（3）：50‑52.
Xie H X，Cai H J，Zhang Z H. Effects of indirect subsurface irrigation on plant physiological characteristics， quality and yield of greenhouse muskmelon［J］. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage，2010，29（3）：50‑52.

［29］孙三民，安巧霞，叶含春，等. 不同滴灌方式对骏枣生长和品质的影响［J］. 灌溉排水学报，2013，32（6）：122‑124.
Sun S M，An Q X，Ye H C，et al. Effects of different irrigation modes on growth and quality of jujube［J］.Journal of Irrigation and Drainage，2013，32（6）：122‑124.

［30］王可，谢香文，洪明. 基于TOPSIS法对和田地区温室番茄滴灌方案优选研究［J］. 节水灌溉，2024（1）：115‑120.
Wang K，Xie X W，Hong M. Optimization of drip irrigation schemes for greenhouse tomatoes in Hotan prefecture based on TOPSIS method［J］. Water Saving Irrigation，2024（1）：115‑120.

［31］Yang L，Zhao F，Chang Q，et al. Effects of vermicomposts on tomato yield and quality and soil fertility in greenhouse under different soil water regimes［J］.Agricultural Water Management，2015，160：98‑105.

［32］郑健，朱传远，齐兴赟，等. 不同生育阶段水/沼液一体化灌溉对番茄生长及产量和品质的影响［J］. 灌溉排水学报，2022（5）：64‑71.
Zheng J，Zhu C Y，Qi X Y，et al. The effects of irrigation with diluted biogas slurry on growth，yield and fruit quality of tomato［J］. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage，2022（5）：64‑71.

［33］杨赟，郑健，齐兴贇. 不同水-沼液一体化间接地下滴灌模式对番茄生长、产量和品质的影响［J］. 节水灌溉，2022（8）：30‑37，45.
Yang Y，Zheng J，Qi X Y. Effect of different water/biogas integrated indirect subsurface drip irrigation patterns on tomato growth，yield and quality［J］. Water Saving Irrigation，2022（8）：30‑37，45.

［34］高俊凤. 植物生理学实验技术［M］. 北京：世界图书出版公司，2000.
Gao J F. Experimental techniques in plant physiology ［M］. Beijing：World Book Publishing Company，2000.

［35］张述伟，宗营杰，方春燕，等. 蒽酮比色法快速测定大麦叶片中可溶性糖含量的优化［J］. 食品研究与开发，2020，41（7）：196‑200.
Zhang S W，Zong Y J，Fang C Y，et al. Optimization of anthrone colorimetric method for rapid determination of soluble sugar in barley leaves［J］. Food Research and Development，2020，41（7）：196‑200.

［36］Wang F，Kang S，Du T，et al. Determination of comprehensive quality index for tomato and its response to different irrigation treatments［J］.Agricultural Water Management，2011，98（8）：1228‑1238.

［37］Zheng J，Pan Z，Ma J，et al. Animal based biogas digestate application frequency effects on growth and water‑nitrogen use efficiency in tomato［J］.International Journal of Agriculture and Biology，2025，22（4）：748‑756.

［38］T/CNHFA 112. 3—2024 保健食品用原料番茄红素（番茄源）第3部分：测定方法［S］.
T/CNHFA 112. 3—2024 Raw materials for health foods—Lycopene（tomato‑derived）—Part 3：determination methods［S］.

［39］柳青，刘继伟，黄广学，等. 钼蓝比色法测定特菜中还原型维C含量的研究［J］. 农产品加工，2019（2）：56‑59.
Liu Q，Liu J W，Huang G X，et al. Study on determination of content of reduction‑type vitamin C in special vegetable with molybdenum‑blue colorimetry［J］. Aem Roducts Rocessing，2019（2）：56‑59.

［40］Qi D，Hu T，Song X，et al. Effect of nitrogen supply method on root growth and grain yield of maize under alternate partial root‑zone irrigation［J］. Scientific Reports，2019，9：8191.

［41］郑健，颜斐，马彪，等. 生育期沼液调控对番茄生长、产量、品质及土壤全氮的影响［J］. 灌溉排水学报，2019，38（7）：23‑31.
Zheng J，Yan F，Ma B，et al. Using biogas slurry to regulate growth，field and fruit quality of greenhouse tomato and nitrogen dynamics in root zone［J］. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage，2019，38（7）：23‑31.

［42］Xiang P，Zheng J，Fan P，et al. Responses of tomato growth and soil environment properties to integrated deficit water‑biogas slurry application under indirect subsurface drip irrigation［J］. Agriculture，2025，15（15）：1601.

［43］张福墁. 设施蔬菜栽培学［M］. 北京：中国农业大学出版社，2019.
Zhang F M. Protected vegetable cultivation［M］.Beijing：China Agricultural University Press，2019.

［44］Wang J，Li Y，Niu W. Deficit alternate drip irrigation increased root‑soil‑plant interaction，tomato yield，and quality［J］. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health，2020，17（3）：781.

［45］陆景陵. 植物营养学：上册［M］. 2版. 北京：中国农业大学出版社，2003.
Lu J L. Plant nutrition（part 1）［M］. 2nd ed. Beijing：China Agricultural University Press，2003.

［46］马彦霞，王晓巍，张玉鑫，等. 膜下调亏灌溉对戈壁荒漠区基质槽培辣椒光合特性的影响［J］. 西北农业学报，2022，31（12）：1597‑1604.
Ma Y X，Wang X W，Zhang Y X，et al. Effect of regulated deficit irrigation on photosynthetic characteristics of Capsicum annuum in Gobi Desert Region［J］. Acta Agriculturae Boreali‑Occidentalis Sinica，2022，31（12）：1597‑1604.

［47］Wang Y，Liu F，Andersen M N，et al. Improved plant nitrogen nutrition contributes to higher water use efficiency in tomatoes under alternate partial root‑zone irrigation［J］. Functional Plant Biology，2010，37（2）：175‑182.

[1]	Fu Shenglan, Gu Caihua, Zhang Yanlin, Sun Wanhui, Xin Longfei. Effects of Rice Husk Biochar and Corn Straw Biochar on Growth，Quality and Soil Nutrients of Huai Chrysanthemum [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(9): 26-34.
[2]	Li Yan, Li Xiaozhen, Zhang Xiaoli. Effects of Biochar Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Growth and Development，Dry Matter Accumulation Characteristics and Yield Benefit of Ryegrass under Saline‑Alkali Stress [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(9): 48-57.
[3]	Cheng Peijun, Li Weiguan, Li Liang, Chang Dong, He Xiaobing, Zhang Xiang, Xu Yueqi, Qiu Lingjun, Suo Yanyan, Si Xianzong, Zhang Heng, Zhang Qian, Xu Fengdan, Li Qian, Yan Meng. Effects of Biochar Combined with Cake Fertilizer on Growth and Aroma Components of Flue‑Cured Tobacco [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(9): 58-67.
[4]	Cheng Hongjian, Yu Mengjiao, Yan Yaqian, Luo Qingqing, Huang Yuan, Wang Jiarui, Song Hang, Fang Baoting, Jin Haiyang, Li Xiangdong. Effects of Straw Incorporation，Tillage and Planting Patterns on Root and Stem Dynamics，Yield，and Economic Benefits of Wheat in Lime Concretion Black Soil [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(9): 79-89.
[5]	Gao Zhihao, Wang Haoqi, Zou Xiangxiang, Wan Yue, Tian Minghui, Deng Xiaohua, Zhou Chuangjin, Chen Shuwei, Wu Ming, Yang Lei, Zhong Guang, Yi Pengfei, Yan Weijie, Yang Lili. Effects of Application of Carbon Fertilizer and Microbial Agent on Ripening Tolerance and Quality of Upper Tobacco Leaves in Mountainous Tobacco‑Planting Areas [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(9): 116-125.
[6]	Guo Dongya, Guo Jun, Liu Xiaolei. Biocontrol Efficacy against Wheat Crown Rot and Whole‑Genome Analysis of Bacillus velezensis ZM01 [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(9): 126-136.
[7]	Li Peibo, Fan Wei, Li Xiaolin, Zhang Shuimei, Liu Ximing, Zhao Zhenlin, Zhang Chang, Yan Jinyao, Liang Yao, Liang Yunjiang, Cai Hongguang. Effects of Tillage Method Combined with Organic Material Application on Yield and Quality of Maize in Chernozem [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(8): 10-21.
[8]	Wang Wenxia, Shi Tian, Chang Bokai, Du Jie. Mechanisms of Brassinolide in Alleviating Drought Stress in Flax Seedlings [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(8): 54-63.
[9]	Lei Yongqi, Tang Heyi, Wang Ge, Wu Yingxia, Xu Xinjuan. Effects of Combined Application of Slow‐Release Fertilizer and Bio‐organic Fertilizer on the Growth，Yield and Quality of Stevia rebaudiana [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(8): 73-83.
[10]	Su Hao, Yang Qingfei, Pei Shun, Liu Aiyu, Xie Zhangshu. Effects of Sowing Date and Chemical Topping Date on Population Structure，Photosynthetic Characteristics，and Yield Formation of Summer⁃Sown Short⁃Season Cotton [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(7): 42-51.
[11]	Du Yifei, Liu Wandong, Wang Xiaotong, Li Shuxia. Effect of Foliar Spraying of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles on SeedGermination，Seedling Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Alfalfa under Drought Stress [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(7): 52-62.
[12]	Yang Yue, Zhao Chengke, Sun Wenjiao, Xu Fangxu, Song Junting, Guo Yuan, Song Shuang, Liu Yuanyuan, Lu Caige, Zhang Dianpeng, Liu Yu. Effects of Adding Cordyceps militaris Spent Mushroom Substrate on Mycelial Growth and Fruiting Body Yield of Pleurotus ostreatus [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(7): 117-125.
[13]	LIU Facai, FU Jiangpeng, YAN Baoqin, ZHAO Zhihui, ZHOU Yingxia, WEI Wei, LI Lili, WANG Yongdong. Comprehensive Evaluation of Adaptability of Different Sorghum Germplasms in Arid Region of Longdong [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(6): 23-30.
[14]	LI Xiujie, WANG Xiuping, ZHANG Xinyou. Nitrogen Response Characteristics of Peanut Varieties with Different Quality Types and Precise Nitrogen Application Recommendation [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(6): 44-55.
[15]	LIU Yurong, LU Juan, SONG Ling, LUO Ruiping, CHEN Hongxian, GUI Mingying. Optimization of Liquid Spawn Fermentation Medium Formula for Lentinula edodes by Response Surface Methodology [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(6): 109-119.