Effects of Phosphorus Reduction Combined with Humic Acid and Biochar Application on Phosphorus Supply in Red Soil and Phosphorus Utilization by Maize

doi:10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2026.09.004

Abstract

Abstract: To investigate the effects of humic acid and biochar addition on soil phosphorus supply and maize phosphorus uptake and utilization in red soil farmland under phosphorus reduction conditions，a randomized complete block design was adopted. Under 40% phosphorus reduction（P₂，P₂O₅ 90 kg/ha），four treatments were set up with different levels of humic acid（H₁，10 000 kg/ha；H₂，5 000 kg/ha）and biochar（B₁，10 000 kg/ha；B₂，5 000 kg/ha），using the local conventional phosphorus application rate（CK，P₂O₅ 150 kg/ha） as the control.The effects of humic acid and biochar addition under phosphorus reduction on the physicochemical properties of red soil，maize phosphorus uptake，and yield were studied.The results showed that，compared with the CK treatment，the addition of humic acid and biochar could，to varying degrees，reduce soil bulk density in the 0—30 cm plough layer，increase soil total porosity and capillary water holding capacity，raise red soil pH and cation exchange capacity（CEC），improve the physicochemical properties of the plough layer soil，increase soil organic matter content，and significantly affect the activities of acid phosphatase（ACP）and alkaline phosphatase（ALP）.Among them，both P₂H₁and P₂B₁ treatments increased soil total phosphorus and available phosphorus contents. Compared with CK，at the trumpet stage，total phosphorus content in P2H1 and P2B1 treatments increased significantly by 35.35% and 35.40%，respectively，and available phosphorus content increased by 13.92% and 35.69%，respectively；at the dough stage，total phosphorus content in P₂H₁ and P2B1 treatments increased by 6.38% and 48.94%，respectively，with the P₂B₁ treatment showing a significant difference compared with CK.Compared with CK，at the dough stage，root and stem biomass and root‑to‑shoot ratio of P₂H₁ and P₂B₁ treatments increased significantly by 24.61%，3.81%，24.65% and 16.65%，12.39%，9.75%，respectively；maize yield increased by 8.46% and 12.03%，respectively；and leaf phosphorus uptake increased significantly by 22.14% and 37.57%，respectively.Correlation analysis of maize yield and phosphorus uptake with biomass and soil factors revealed that alkaline phosphatase activity and organic matter content were extremely significantly positively correlated with total phosphorus and available phosphorus content；soil total porosity was significantly positively correlated with total phosphorus content and extremely significantly positively correlated with available phosphorus content；CEC and soil capillary water holding rate were significantly positively correlated with available phosphorus content；yield was significantly positively correlated with total phosphorus content and positively correlated with available phosphorus content； phosphorus uptake was positively correlated with total phosphorus content.Comprehensively，humic acid and biochar improve the phosphorus supply capacity of red soil by regulating soil physicochemical properties and phosphatase activities，ultimately promoting efficient phosphorus uptake and utilization by maize. Under 40% phosphorus reduction，the application of 10 000 kg/ha biochar can effectively improve the physicochemical properties of red soil，promote phosphorus supply and maize phosphorus uptake，and ensure maize growth，development and yield formation.

Key words: Maize, Red soil, Humic acid, Biochar, Phosphorus reduction, Phosphorus uptake and utilization

摘要： 为探究红壤耕地在减磷条件下，添加腐植酸和生物炭对土壤磷供给及玉米磷吸收利用的影响，采取随机区组设计，在减磷40%（P₂，P₂O₅ 90 kg/hm²）条件下，分别设置不同水平的腐植酸（H₁，10 000 kg/hm²；H₂，5 000 kg/hm²）和生物炭（B₁，10 000 kg/hm²；B₂，5 000 kg/hm²）共4 个处理，以当地常规施磷量（P₂O₅150 kg/hm²）作为对照（CK），研究减磷条件下添加腐植酸和生物炭对红壤理化性质、玉米磷吸收量及产量的影响。结果表明，与CK处理相比，添加腐植酸和生物炭均能不同程度降低0~30 cm耕层土壤容重，增加土壤总孔隙度和毛管持水率，提高红壤pH值和阳离子交换量（CEC），改善耕作层土壤理化性质，提高土壤有机质含量，显著影响酸性磷酸酶（ACP）与碱性磷酸酶（ALP）活性。其中，P₂H₁和P₂B₁处理均可提高土壤全磷和有效磷含量。与CK相比，大喇叭口期P₂H₁和P₂B₁处理的全磷含量分别显著提高35.35%、35.40%，有效磷含量分别提高13.92%、35.69%；蜡熟期P₂H₁和P₂B₁处理的全磷含量分别提高6.38%、48.94%，且P₂B₁处理与CK处理差异显著。与CK相比，蜡熟期P₂H₁和P₂B₁处理的根、茎生物量和根冠比分别显著提高24.61%、3.81%、24.65% 和16.65%、12.39%、9.75%，玉米产量分别提高8.46%、12.03%，叶磷吸收量分别显著提高22.14%、37.57%。玉米产量和磷吸收量与生物量、土壤因子之间的相关性分析结果表明，碱性磷酸酶活性、有机质含量与全磷和有效磷含量均呈极显著正相关，土壤总孔隙度与全磷和有效磷含量分别呈显著正相关和极显著正相关，CEC、土壤毛管持水率与有效磷含量分别呈显著正相关；产量与全磷和有效磷含量分别呈显著正相关和正相关，植株磷吸收量与全磷含量呈正相关。综上，腐植酸和生物炭是通过调控土壤理化性质和磷酸酶的活性提高红壤磷供给能力，最终促进玉米磷肥高效吸收利用。在减磷40%条件下，施用10 000 kg/hm²生物炭能有效改善红壤理化性状，促进磷供给和玉米对磷的吸收，保障玉米生长发育和产量形成。

关键词: 玉米, 红壤, 腐植酸, 生物炭, 减磷, 磷吸收利用

CLC Number:

S513

Liu Zhijun, Bao Dejue, Zhou Shiyong, Zhang Chenglong, Wu Dandan, Pu Zixian, Yin Lixiao, Zhou Feng. Effects of Phosphorus Reduction Combined with Humic Acid and Biochar Application on Phosphorus Supply in Red Soil and Phosphorus Utilization by Maize[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(9): 35-47.

刘志军, 保德珏, 周世永, 张乘龙, 吴丹丹, 普梓娴, 尹丽肖, 周锋. 减磷配施腐植酸与生物炭对红壤磷供给及玉米磷利用的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2026, 55(9): 35-47.

Figures/Tables 9

References

［1］何依龙，周文利，常会庆. 不同施磷量对小麦-玉米种植体系土壤磷吸附-解吸特征的影响［J］. 河南科技大学学报（自然科学版），2025，46（3）：91‑96.

He Y L，Zhou W L，Chang H Q. Effects of different phosphorus application rates on soil phosphorus adsorption‑desorption characteristics in wheat‑maize cropping system［J］. Journal of Henan University of Science&Technology （Natural Science），2025，46（3）：91‑96.

［2］Yang X Y，Fang S B. Practices，perceptions，and implications of fertilizer use in East‑Central China［J］.Ambio，2015，44（7）：647‑652.

［3］苏丽珍，张连娅，王思睿，等. 低磷红壤的玉米磷肥农学效应与农学阈值［J］. 农业环境科学学报，2022，41（9）：2004‑2010.

Su L Z，Zhang L Y，Wang S R，et al. Agronomic effects and threshold of phosphorus fertilizer in low phosphorus red soil maize［J］. Journal of Agro‑Environment Science，2022，41（9）：2004‑2010.

［4］陈均玲，游勇. 不同磷钾用量对平南县水稻产量影响及效应研究［J］. 广西农学报，2018，33（3）：4‑8.

Chen J L，You Y. Study on impact and effect of different mounts of phosphorus and potassium on rice yield in Pingnan County［J］. Journal of Guangxi Agriculture，2018，33（3）：4‑8.

［5］闫蓉，朱利，冉瑾怡，等. 渭北旱地磷肥减施措施对冬小麦产量及磷吸收利用的影响［J］. 植物营养与肥料学报，2023（7）：1265‑1279.

Yan R，Zhu L，Ran J Y，et al. Effects of phosphorus reduction measures on winter wheat yield and phosphorus uptake and utilization in Weibei dryland［J］.Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers，2023（7）：1265‑1279.

［6］陈源，郭旭光，朱兴奎，等. 红壤玉米的土壤呼吸速率与土壤碳排放效率及其施磷响应［J］. 云南农业大学学报，2024，39（11）：142‑150.

Chen Y，Guo X G，Zhu X K，et al. Soil respiration rate and soil carbon emission efficiency of maize and its response to phosphorus application in red soil［J］.Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University（Social Science），2024，39（11）：142‑150.

［7］李石恒，王毅，卜令豪. 寒旱区氮磷钾元素缺乏对小白菜生长的影响［J］. 安徽农业科学，2021，49（17）：136‑139.

Li S H，Wang Y，Bu L H. Effects of nitrogen，phosphorus and potassium deficiency on growth of cabbage［J］.Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences，2021，49（17）：136‑139.

［8］Wang C，Ning P. Post‑silking phosphorus recycling and carbon partitioning in maize under low to high phosphorus inputs and their effects on grain yield［J］.Frontiers in Plant Science，2019，10：784.

［9］Zhu H H， Chen W W， Yang Z A， et al.SlSTOP1‑regulated SlHAK5 expression confers Al tolerance in tomato by facilitating citrate secretion from roots［J］. Horticulture Research，2024，11（11）：uhae282.

［10］宋燕凤，张前前，吴震，等. 田间陈化生物质炭提高稻田土壤团聚体稳定性和磷素利用率［J］. 植物营养与肥料学报，2020，26（4）：613‑621.

Song Y F，Zhang Q Q，Wu Z，et al. Field‑aged biochar improves soil aggregation stability and phosphorus use efficiency in paddy field［J］. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers，2020，26（4）：613‑621.

［11］李春越，党廷辉，王万忠，等. 中国几种典型农田土壤磷素固液相分配规律［J］. 农业环境科学学报，2008，27（5）：2008‑2012.
Li C Y，Dang T H，Wang W Z，et al. Distribution law in the solid‑liquid phase of phosphorus for several typical soils in China［J］. Journal of Agro‑Environment Science，2008，27（5）：2008‑2012.

［12］Mabagala F S，Mng’ong’o M E. On the tropical soils；the influence of organic matter（OM）on phosphate bioavailability［J］. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences，2022，29（5）：3635‑3641.

［13］Zhu J M，Kaeppler S M，Lynch J P. Mapping of QTL controlling root hair length in maize（Zea mays L.）under phosphorus deficiency［J］. Plant and Soil，2005，270（1）：299‑310.

［14］张巧莉，吴永波，蒲可逸. 施加生物炭对盐碱土中桑树幼苗生长、生理及土壤性质的影响［J］. 植物资源与环境学报，2025，34（5）：33‑42.
Zhang Q L，Wu Y B，Pu K Y. Effect of biochar application on growth and physiology of Morus alba seedlings and soil properties in saline‑alkali soil［J］.Journal of Plant Resources and Environment，2025，34 （5）：33‑42.

［15］蒋少军，刘峻光，刘玲玲，等. 生物炭对矿区农田土壤及大豆安全种植的影响研究［J］. 农业环境科学学报，2019，38（1）：124‑131.
Jiang S J，Liu J G，Liu L L，et al. Effect of biochar on farmland soil and planting security of soybean in mining area［J］. Journal of Agro‑Environment Science，2019，38（1）：124‑131.

［16］任思豪，付永坤，郭春春，等. 玉米秸秆热解衍生生物炭稳定性及其改良土壤效果评估［J］. 农业工程学报，2025，41（14）：255‑264.
Ren S H，Fu Y K，Guo C C，et al. Evaluating soil enhancement and biochar stability derived from maize straw pyrolysis［J］. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering，2025，41（14）：255‑264.

［17］Ippolito J A，Stromberger M E，Lentz R D，et al.Hardwood biochar and manure co‑application to a calcareous soil［J］. Chemosphere，2016，142：84‑91.

［18］Zhang H Z，Chen C R，Gray E M，et al. Roles of biochar in improving phosphorus availability in soils：a phosphate adsorbent and a source of available phosphorus［J］. Geoderma，2016，276：1‑6.

［19］Zhai L M，Cai J Z，Liu J，et al. Short‑term effects of maize residue biochar on phosphorus availability in two soils with different phosphorus sorption capacities［J］. Biology and Fertility of Soils，2015，51（1）：113‑122.

［20］韦金菊，秦国兵，张庚金，等. 不同粒径生物炭对土壤磷吸附‑解吸特性的影响［J］. 应用生态学报，2023，34（3）：708‑716.
Wei J J，Qin G B，Zhang G J，et al. Effect of biochar with different particle sizes on the sorption‑desorption characteristics of soil phosphorus［J］. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology，2023，34（3）：708‑716.

［21］Wang S J，Dong D M，Li P，et al. Mercury concentration and fatty acid composition in muscle tissue of marine fish species harvested from Liaodong Gulf：an intelligence quotient and coronary heart disease risk assessment［J］.Science of the Total Environment，2020，726：138586.

［22］胡家钰，高兵阳，高怡帆，等. 氮肥与腐植酸配施对砂质中低产田土壤质量和作物产量的影响［J］. 应用生态学报，2025，36（9）：2639‑2648.
Hu J Y，Gao B Y，Gao Y F，et al. Effect of combined application of nitrogen fertilizer and humic acid on soil quality and crop yield in sandy low‑to‑medium productivity farmland［J］. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology，2025，36（9）：2639‑2648.

［23］Ahmad I，Ali S，Khan K，et al. Use of coal derived humic acid as soil conditioner to improve soil physical properties and wheat yield［J］. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science，2015，5（5）：268‑275.

［24］孙桂芳，金继运，石元亮. 腐殖酸和改性木质素对土壤磷有效性影响的研究进展［J］. 土壤通报，2011，42（4）：1003‑1009.
Sun G F，Jin J Y，Shi Y L. Advances in the effect of humic acid and modified lignin on availability to crops［J］.Chinese Journal of Soil Science，2011，42（4）：1003‑1009.

［25］Xiong Q Z，Wang S J，Chen X X，et al. Nano‑sized humic acid improves phosphate fertiliser efficiency in chilli peppe［r J］. Pedosphere，2025，35（6）：1065‑1077.

［26］Yang F，Sui L，Tang C Y，et al. Sustainable advances on phosphorus utilization in soil via addition of biochar and humic substances［J］. Science of the Total Environment，2021，768：145106.

［27］鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析［M］. 3版. 北京：中国农业出版社，2000.
Bao S D. Soil and agricultural chemistry analysis［M］. 3rd ed. Beijing：China Agriculture Press，2000.

［28］马大卫，马彦军，郭咏淳，等. 河西走廊盐碱地4种典型植被类型土壤理化性质和酶活性特征［J］. 水土保持学报，2025，39（2）：102‑110.
Ma D W，Ma Y J，Guo Y C，et al. Soil physicochemical properties and enzyme activity characteristics of four typical vegetation types in saline‑alkali lands of the Hexi Corridor［J］. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation，2025，39（2）：102‑110.

［29］张慧琦，李子忠，秦艳. 玉米秸秆生物炭用量对砂土孔隙和持水性的影响［J］. 生态环境学报，2022，31（6）：1272‑1277.
Zhang H Q，Li Z Z，Qin Y. Effects of corn straw‑based biochar amount on pores and water holding capacity of sandy soil［J］. Ecology and Environment Sciences，2022，31（6）：1272‑1277.

［30］翟文晰，刘增照，郝明德，等. 施用腐植酸对小麦生长和（𪣻）土理化性质的影响［J］. 水土保持研究，2021，28（3）：25‑29.
Zhai W X，Liu Z Z，Hao M D，et al. Effects of humic acid application on wheat growth and physical and chemical properties of Lou soil［J］. Research of Soil and Water Conservation，2021，28（3）：25‑29.

［31］陈士更，张民，丁方军，等. 腐植酸土壤调理剂对酸化果园土壤理化性状及苹果产量和品质的影响［J］. 土壤，2019，51（1）：83‑89.
Chen S G，Zhang M，Ding F J，et al. Humic acid soil conditioner improved soil physicochemical properties，apple yield and quality in acidified orchard soil［J］.Soils，2019，51（1）：83‑89.

［32］王宇函，吕波，张林，等. 不同土壤改良剂对酸性铝富集红壤毒性缓解效应的差异［J］. 华中农业大学学报，2019（2）：73‑80.
Wang Y H，Lü B，Zhang L，et al. Differences in toxicity mitigation effects of different anendments on acidic aluminum‑enriched red soil［J］. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University，2019（2）：73‑80.

［33］张继东，张亚雄，程伟，等. 生物质炭和有机肥配施对苹果重茬育苗地土壤理化性质和微生物群落特征的影响［J］. 中国农业科技导报，2024，26（8）：213‑222.
Zhang J D，Zhang Y X，Cheng W，et al. Effects of combined application of biochar and organic fertilizer on soil physicochemical properties and microbial community characteristics in apple recropping field［J］. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology，2024，26（8）：213‑222.

［34］陈星星，刘新社，王盛荣. 腐殖酸对盐胁迫下土壤理化性质、微环境及苦瓜生长的影响［J］. 江苏农业科学，2023，51（17）：138‑144.
Chen X X，Liu X S，Wang S R. Influences of humic acid on soil physical and chemical properties，microenvironment and balsam pear growth under salt stress［J］. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences，2023，51（17）：138‑144.

［35］李博洋，叶茵，楚睿雯，等. 施加生物炭对谷子干物质积累、转运、分配和土壤理化性质的影响［J］. 作物学报，2024，50（3）：695‑708.
Li B Y，Ye Y，Chu R W，et al. Effects of biochar application on dry matter accumulation，transport，and distribution of foxtail millet and soil physicochemical properties［J］. Acta Agronomica Sinica，2024，50（3）：695‑708.

［36］Zhang Y L，Chen L J，Zhang Y G，et al. Examining the effects of biochar application on soil phosphorus levels and phosphatase activities with visible and fluorescence spectroscopy［J］. Guang Pu，2016，36（7）：2325‑2329.

［37］张璐，阎海涛，任天宝，等. 有机物料对植烟土壤养分、酶活性和微生物群落功能多样性的影响［J］. 中国烟草学报，2019，25（2）：55‑62.
Zhang L，Yan H T，Ren T B，et al. Effects of organic matter on nutrient，enzyme activity and functional diversity of microbial community in tobacco planting soil［J］. Acta Tabacaria Sinica，2019，25（2）：55‑62.

［38］Yousef S M，El‑Gendi H，Ghozlan H，et al. Production，partial purification and characterization of alkaline phosphatase from a thermo‑alkaliphile Geobacillus thermodenitrificans I₂ isolate［J］. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology，2021，31：101853.

［39］杨文娜，余泺，罗东海，等. 化肥和有机肥配施生物炭对土壤磷酸酶活性和微生物群落的影响［J］. 环境科学，2022，43（1）：540‑549.
Yang W N，Yu L，Luo D H，et al. Effect of combined application of biochar with chemical fertilizer and organic fertilizer on soil phosphatase activity and microbial community［J］. Environmental Science，2022，43（1）：540‑549.

［40］琚晨仪，王珍珍，肖庆礼，等. 生物炭添加对重庆山区烟田土壤理化性质和烤烟生长、产量及产值的影响［J］. 水土保持通报，2024，44（4）：205‑214.
Ju C Y，Wang Z Z，Xiao Q L，et al. Effects of different biochar additions on soil physicochemical properties and tobacco growth，yield，and output value in Chongqing mountainous region［J］. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation，2024，44（4）：205‑214.

［41］文勤亮，郭倩楠，祝媛，等. 南方酸性土壤团聚体对磷的吸附解吸特征及pH值的影响［J］. 黑龙江大学自然科学学报，2014，31（6）：800‑805.
Wen Q L，Guo Q N，Zhu Y，et al. Characteristic of phosphorus adsorption‑desorption on southern acid soils and the effect of pH value［J］. Journal of Natural Science of Heilongjiang University，2014，31（6）：800‑805.

［42］Janes‑Bassett V，Blackwell M S A，Blair G，et al. A meta‑analysis of phosphatase activity in agricultural settings in response to phosphorus deficiency［J］. Soil Biology and Biochemistry，2022，165：108537.

［43］Zandonadi D B，Santos M P，Dobbss L B，et al. Nitric oxide mediates humic acids‑induced root development and plasma membrane H+‑ATPase activation［J］.Planta，2010，231（5）：1025‑1036.

[1]	Ye Jiangnan, Chen Min, Sun Yuan, Yang Jiali, Wang Wenshuo, Han Zhengdong, Lu Shengyong. Research Progress of Mineral Modified Biochar in Soil Carbon Sequestration Application [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(9): 1-7.
[2]	Jin Long, Haider Sultan, Jiang Qiaohan, Zhang Yunbo. Advances in Biochar Production Process and Its Effects on Soil Properties [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(9): 8-25.
[3]	Fu Shenglan, Gu Caihua, Zhang Yanlin, Sun Wanhui, Xin Longfei. Effects of Rice Husk Biochar and Corn Straw Biochar on Growth，Quality and Soil Nutrients of Huai Chrysanthemum [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(9): 26-34.
[4]	Li Yan, Li Xiaozhen, Zhang Xiaoli. Effects of Biochar Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Growth and Development，Dry Matter Accumulation Characteristics and Yield Benefit of Ryegrass under Saline‑Alkali Stress [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(9): 48-57.
[5]	Cheng Peijun, Li Weiguan, Li Liang, Chang Dong, He Xiaobing, Zhang Xiang, Xu Yueqi, Qiu Lingjun, Suo Yanyan, Si Xianzong, Zhang Heng, Zhang Qian, Xu Fengdan, Li Qian, Yan Meng. Effects of Biochar Combined with Cake Fertilizer on Growth and Aroma Components of Flue‑Cured Tobacco [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(9): 58-67.
[6]	Jiang Ya, Wang Li, Luo Lina, Liu Guihua, Chai Guanqun, Wei Xiaoliao, Qin Song, Fan Chengwu. Effects of Biochar on Microbial Community Structure and Cadmium Availability in Cadmium‑Contaminated Soil [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(9): 68-78.
[7]	Li Peibo, Fan Wei, Li Xiaolin, Zhang Shuimei, Liu Ximing, Zhao Zhenlin, Zhang Chang, Yan Jinyao, Liang Yao, Liang Yunjiang, Cai Hongguang. Effects of Tillage Method Combined with Organic Material Application on Yield and Quality of Maize in Chernozem [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(8): 10-21.
[8]	Li Fangjie, Shi Dakun, Wei Xiaoyi, Wei Feng, Liu Junheng, Mei Yongxian. Comprehensive Evaluation of Lodging Resistance of 78 Maize Inbred Lines and Screening of Core Indexes [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(7): 11-19.
[9]	Yang Yue, Zhao Chengke, Sun Wenjiao, Xu Fangxu, Song Junting, Guo Yuan, Song Shuang, Liu Yuanyuan, Lu Caige, Zhang Dianpeng, Liu Yu. Effects of Adding Cordyceps militaris Spent Mushroom Substrate on Mycelial Growth and Fruiting Body Yield of Pleurotus ostreatus [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(7): 117-125.
[10]	ZHANG Yunhong, YANG Yonghui, HAN Weifeng, HUA Yingpeng, GAO Cuimin, PAN Xiaoying, HE Fang, ZHANG Huan, DING Jinli, XU Qihao, LIU Wen. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Different Functional Organic Fertilizers on Soil Nitrogen Transformation，Water and Nitrogen Use，and Yield of Maize [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(5): 1-12.
[11]	ZHANG Meiwei, GUO Hanxiao, MU Weilin, YU Ting, ZHANG Panpan, LI Chuan, YAN Zhenhua, QIAO Jiangfang. Effect of Times of Spraying Chemical Regulator on Canopy and Stem Characteristics of Densely Planted Maize [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(5): 13-21.
[12]	YAN Lili, HONG Yao, LIANG Guili. Effects of Nitrogen Application Method and Rate on Photosynthetic Characters，Antioxidant Properties，and Yield of Maize under High Temperature Stress after Flowering [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(5): 22-34.
[13]	MU Weilin, GUO Hanxiao, YAN Zhenhua, YU Ting, ZHANG Meiwei, ZHANG Panpan, LI Chuan, NIU Jun, QIAO Jiangfang. Effects of Planting Patterns on Agronomic Traits，Grain Filling Characteristics and Yield of Different Summer Maize Varieties [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(5): 35-42.
[14]	LIANG Lu, YIN Kun, ZHANG Weijie, ZHUANG Qiuli, XU Bohan, TIAN Kaiyue, ZHANG Dongjie, ZHANG Donghui, HUANG Yubo. Impact of Vermicompost Application Rate for Winter Wheat on Dry Matter Accumulation，Transportation，and Yield of Subsequent Maize in Lime Concretion Black Soil [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(5): 43-52.
[15]	MENG Xiangqi, DONG Yanhong, LI Xulin, HAN Zenghui, ZHANG Shimin, ZHENG Shuyun, LIU Junhao, MA Lei, LI Zengqiang. Effects of Different Organic Materials with Equal Carbon Application on the Yield of Chinese Cabbage and Soil Fertility [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(5): 73-82.