Evaluation of Drought Resistance of Radish under Combined Stress of High Temperature and Drought Based on Multiple Indicators

doi:10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2026.05.012

Abstract

Abstract: During the radish sowing season in Chongqing and its surrounding areas，radishes often face the combined stress of high temperature and drought.To establish a multi‐index comprehensive evaluation system for radish drought tolerance under combined high temperature and drought stress and screen drought‐resistant radish genetic resources，11 radish varieties（lines）were used as materials.After 40 ℃ high temperature and water cessation treatment for 0，2，6，12，24，and 48 h in 5—6 leaf radish seedlings，the plant height，aboveground fresh weight，underground fresh weight，superoxide dismutase（SOD），ascorbate peroxidase（APX），catalase（CAT），peroxidase（POD）activities，malondialdehyde（MDA）content，and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters（F₀，F_m，F_v/F_m）were measured.The drought tolerance of radishes under combined high temperature and drought stress was comprehensively evaluated by using the membership function analysis and principal component analysis.The results showed that all radish varieties（lines）died after 48 h of stress. With the intensification of high‐temperature and drought stress，the relative plant height，aboveground fresh weight and underground fresh weight of different radish varieties（lines）showed a downward trend.The relative activities of APX，POD and SOD first increased，then decreased and then increased again，while the relative CAT activity first increased and then decreased.The relative MDA content first increased，then decreased and then increased again.The 6—12 h of stress was the key response period.The relative APX and CAT activities were the highest at 6 h of stress，the relative SOD and POD activities significantly decreased after 2 h of stress and then increased after 12 h of stress，and the relative MDA content decreased to the lowest at 6 h.The relative F_v/F_mand Fm decreased to the lowest after 24 h of drought.According to the comprehensive evaluation results of all indicators，the drought tolerance of the 11 radish varieties（lines）from strong to weak was Fuling wild radish，Changshou wild radish，BZ2，Lanhuazi，Hongxing cherry radish，ZY228，Baidingshui radish，Changhong No.1，Xichang white，ZY147，and ZY4.The constructed multi‐index evaluation system can effectively identify the drought tolerance of radishes under combined high temperature and drought stress and screen drought‐resistant varieties. Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters（F₀，F_m），SOD，CAT activities can be used as important traits for rapid identification of radish drought tolerance in areas with frequent high temperature and drought.

Key words: Radish, High‐temperature and drought stress, Physiological and biochemical indicators, Comprehensive evaluation, Drought‐tolerant variety

摘要： 重庆及周边地区萝卜播种季节，常面临高温干旱复合胁迫。为建立高温干旱复合胁迫下萝卜多指标综合耐旱性评价体系，筛选抗旱萝卜基因资源，以11份萝卜品种（系）为材料，5~6叶期萝卜苗在40 ℃高温与停止浇水处理0、2、6、12、24、48 h后，测定株高、地上鲜质量、地下鲜质量、超氧化物歧化酶（SOD）、抗坏血酸过氧化物酶（APX）活性、过氧化氢酶（CAT）活性、过氧化物酶（POD）活性、丙二醛（MDA）含量和叶绿素荧光参数（F₀、F_m、F_v/F_m）等指标，采用隶属函数分析和主成分分析对萝卜在高温干旱复合胁迫下的抗旱性进行综合评价。结果表明，萝卜品种（系）在胁迫48 h后全部死亡，随着高温干旱胁迫的加剧，不同萝卜品种（系）的相对株高、地上鲜质量和地下鲜质量呈下降趋势，相对APX、POD和SOD活性先上升后下降再上升，相对CAT活性先上升后下降，相对MDA含量先上升后下降再上升。胁迫6~12 h为关键响应时期，相对APX、CAT活性在胁迫6 h最高，相对SOD、POD活性在胁迫2 h后显著下降，在胁迫12 h后上升，相对MDA含量在6 h降至最低，相对F_v/F_m和F_m在干旱24 h后降至最低。根据各指标的综合评价结果，11份萝卜品种（系）抗旱性由强到弱为涪陵野萝卜、长寿野萝卜、BZ2、蓝花籽、红星樱桃萝卜、ZY228、白丁水萝卜、长红1号、西昌白、ZY147和ZY4。构建的多指标评价体系能有效鉴定萝卜在高温干旱复合胁迫下的抗旱性，筛选出抗旱品种，叶绿素荧光参数（F₀、F_m）、SOD、CAT活性等关键指标可作为高温干旱频发地区萝卜抗旱性快速鉴定的重要性状。

关键词: 萝卜, 高温干旱复合胁迫, 生理生化指标, 综合评价, 耐旱品种

CLC Number:

S631.1

TIAN Luyao, CHEN Fabo, SUN Chun, YAN Qingjiu. Evaluation of Drought Resistance of Radish under Combined Stress of High Temperature and Drought Based on Multiple Indicators[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(5): 116-127.

田璐瑶, 陈发波, 孙春, 晏庆九. 高温干旱复合胁迫下萝卜多指标综合抗旱性评价[J]. 河南农业科学, 2026, 55(5): 116-127.

Figures/Tables 8

References

［1］张平平，吴建国，陈迈，等. 浙江地方萝卜种质资源农艺性状研究［J］. 长江蔬菜，2017（22）：35‐41.

ZHANG P P，WU J G，CHEN M，et al. Study on agronomic traits of local radish germplasm resources in Zhejiang Province［J］. Journal of Changjiang Vegetables，2017（22）：35‐41.

［2］任喜波，高金远，戴希尧，等. 萝卜主要糖分含量的配合力分析［J］. 吉林农业大学学报，2012，34（3）：281‐284，304.

REN X B，GAO J Y，DAI X Y，et al. Combining ability analysis of main sugar content in radish［J］. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University，2012，34（3）：281‐284，304.

［3］袁伟玲，袁尚勇，崔磊，等. 水果萝卜肉质根和叶片硫代葡萄糖苷鉴定及含量分析［J］. 中国蔬菜，2017（11）：27‐32.

YUAN W L，YUAN S Y，CUI L，et al. Identification and content analysis of glucosinolates in leaf and root of fruity radish（Raphanus sativas L.）［J］. China Vegetables，2017（11）：27‐32.

［4］FARAG M A，ABDEL MOTAAL A A. Sulforaphane composition， cytotoxic and antioxidant activity of crucifer vegetables［J］. Journal of Advanced Research，2010，1（1）：65‐70.

［5］贾子康. 中国南方夏季极端高温和地表气温的多时间尺度变化及预报研究［D］. 兰州：兰州大学，2023.

JIA Z K. Multi‐timescale variations and forecasts of summer extreme high‐temperature and surface air temperature in Southern China［D］. Lanzhou：Lanzhou University，2023.

［6］初敏，庄志群，王秀峰，等. 不同耐热性萝卜幼苗对高温胁迫的生理响应［J］. 山东农业大学学报（自然科学版），2014，45（3）：334‐339.

CHU M，ZHUANG Z Q，WANG X F，et al. Study on physiological response to high temperature stress in different heat tolerance radish seedlings［J］. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University （Natural Science Edition），2014，45（3）：334‐339.

［7］张蜀宁，张红亮，张宇，等. 干旱胁迫下二倍体、四倍体萝卜抗氧化酶活性比较［J］. 江西农业学报，2011，23（4）：39‐41.

ZHANG S N，ZHANG H L，ZHANG Y，et al. Studies on activities of antioxidant enzymes in diploid and tetraploid radish under drought stress ［J］. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi，2011，23（4）：39‐41.

［8］摆福红，王凯彬，马小红，等. 不同萝卜品种种子萌发期抗旱性综合评价及抗旱指标筛选［J］. 西北农林科技大学学报（自然科学版），2024，52（8）：70‐81.

BAI F H，WANG K B，MA X H，et al. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of different radish varieties at seed germination stage and screening of drought resistance indexes［J］. Journal of Northwest A & F University（Natural Science Edition），2024，52（8）：70‐81.

［9］摆福红. 宁夏六盘山区不同播期耐寒耐旱耐抽薹耐贮藏萝卜品种比较［D］. 银川：宁夏大学，2023.

BAI F H. Comparison of radish varieties with cold，drought，bolting and storage tolerance during different sowing periods in Liupanshan district of Ningxia［D］.Yinchuan：Ningxia University，2023.

［10］崔和馨. 干旱胁迫下萝卜种子萌发期蛋白的双向电泳分析［J］. 生物化工，2024，10（1）：54‐58.

CUI H X. Two‐dimensional electrophoresis analysis of the Raphanus sativus L. proteins during seed germination under drought stress［J］.Biological Chemical Engineering，2024，10（1）：54‐58.

［11］周娜，郑阳，陆景伟，等. 高温胁迫下萝卜苗期的转录组分析［J］. 南方农业学报，2022，53（3）：665‐675.

ZHOU N，ZHENG Y，LU J W，et al. Transcriptome analysis of Raphanus sativus seedlings in response to high temperature stress［J］. Journal of Southern Agriculture，2022，53（3）：665‐675.

［12］周娜，郑阳，陆景伟，等. 高温胁迫对萝卜幼苗生长及相关基因表达的影响［J］. 西北植物学报，2022，42（7）：1161‐1168.

ZHOU N，ZHENG Y，LU J W，et al. Effect of high temperature stress on growth and expression levels of related genes in radish seedling［J］. Acta Botanica Boreali‐Occidentalia Sinica，2022，42（7）：1161‐1168.

［13］曾子入，贺从安，张小康，等. 高温胁迫诱导萝卜基因组甲基化变异分析［J］. 分子植物育种，2018，16（7）：2094‐2098.

ZENG Z R，HE C A，ZHANG X K，et al. Analysis of genome methylation mutation in radish（Raphanus sativus L.）induced by heat stress［J］. Molecular Plant Breeding，2018，16（7）：2094‐2098.

［14］邹琦. 植物生理学实验指导［M］. 北京：中国农业出版社，2000：18‐165.

ZOU Q. Experimental guidance in plant physiology ［M］. Beijing：China Agricultural Press，2000：18‐165.

［15］杨丹，张舒芸，田新会，等. 不同黑麦品种（品系）对持续干旱胁迫的形态适应性研究［J］. 草地学报，2020，28（1）：122‐129.

YANG D，ZHANG S Y，TIAN X H，et al.Morphological adaptability of different rye varieties（lines）to persistent drought stress［J］. Acta Agrestia Sinica，2020，28（1）：122‐129.

［16］赵方媛，田新会，杜文华. PEG-6000模拟干旱胁迫对15个小黑麦品系苗期生理特性的影响［J］. 干旱地区农业研究，2019，37（5）：106‐113.

ZHAO F Y，TIAN X H，DU W H. Effects of PEG‐6000 simulated drought stress on the physiological characteristics of 15 Triticale varieties at the seedling stage［J］. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas，2019，37（5）：106‐113.

［17］陈钰，褚红丽，杜文华. 基于生理生化指标8份饲用小黑麦品种（系）抗旱性评价［J］. 草地学报，2025，33（7）：2238‐2248.

CHEN Y，CHU H L，DU W H. Drought resistance evaluation of 8 forage Triticale varieties（lines）based on physiological and biochemical indexes［J］. Acta Agrestia Sinica，2025，33（7）：2238‐2248.

［18］李静雯，白斌，厚毅清，等. 西北半干旱雨养区旱地冬小麦品种气孔与光合生理特点分析［J］. 麦类作物学报，2025，45（5）：593‐607.
LI J W，BAI B，HOU Y Q，et al. Stomatal and photosynthetic physiological characteristics of dryland wheat varieties in semiarid rainfed agriculture area in northwest of China［J］.Journal of Triticeae Crops，2025，45（5）：593‐607.

［19］刘肖冰. 基于主成分分析和聚类分析不同品种猕猴桃品质评价［J］. 现代食品科技，2024，40（10）：284‐292.
LIU X B. Quality evaluation of different varieties of kiwifruit based on principal components analysis and cluster analysis ［J］. Modern Food Science&Technology，2024，40（10）：284‐292.

［20］许令明，曹昀，汤思文，等. 干旱胁迫及复水对花叶芦竹生理特性的影响［J］. 中国水土保持科学，2020，18（3）：59‐66.
XU L M，CAO Y，TANG S W，et al. Effects of drought stress and rewatering on physiological characteristics of Arundo donax var. versicolor［J］. Science of Soil and Water Conservation，2020，18（3）：59‐66.

［21］许爱云，曹兵，谢云. 干旱风沙区煤炭基地12种草本植物对干旱胁迫的生理生态响应及抗旱性评价［J］.草业学报，2020，29（10）：22‐34.
XU A Y，CAO B，XIE Y. Physiological‐ecological responses of twelve herbaceous plant species under drought stress and evaluation of their drought resistance when planted in coal producting basis in arid windy and sandy areas［J］.Acta Prataculturae Sinica，2020，29（10）：22‐34.

［22］SELOTE D S，KHANNA‐CHOPRA R. Drought acclimation confers oxidative stress tolerance by inducing co‐ordinated antioxidant defense at cellular and subcellular level in leaves of wheat seedlings［J］.Physiologia Plantarum，2006，127（3）：494‐506.

［23］牛奎举. 外源5-氨基乙酰丙酸对干旱胁迫下草地早熟禾光合作用的调控机制［D］. 兰州：甘肃农业大学，2018.
NIU K J. The role of 5‐aminolevulinic acid on regulation mechanism of photosynthesis in Kentucky bluegrass seedlings under drought stress［D］. Lanzhou：Gansu Agricultural University，2018.
［24］马碧花，蔺伟虎，高敏，等. 干旱胁迫下水杨酸和内生真菌对多年生黑麦草的影响［J］. 草业学报，2020，29（1）：135‐144.

MA B H，LIN W H，GAO M，et al. Effects of salicylic acid and Epichloё on perennial ryegrass（Lolium perenne）under drought stress［J］.Acta Prataculturae Sinica，2020，29（1）：135‐144.
［25］高芳，杨娜，王小林，等. 生物炭与氮肥配施对绿豆干旱胁迫及复水后光合特性及根系形态的影响［J/OL］.山西农业科学，2025（2025‐11‐24）［2026‐01‐20］.https：//link. cnki. net/urlid/14. 1113. S. 20251124. 1623.002.

GAO F，YANG N，WANG X L，et al. The effects of biochar combined with nitrogen fertilizer on the photosynthetic characteristics and root morphology of mung bean under drought stress and after rewatering［J/OL］. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences，2025（2025‐11‐24）［2026‐01‐20］. https：//link.cnki.net/urlid/14.1113.S.20251124.1623.002.
［26］张然，李佳缙，王铭，等. 11份草地早熟禾种质材料对PEG-6000胁迫的生理响应和耐旱性评价［J］.草原与草坪，2021，41（2）：113‐121.
ZHANG R，LI J J，WANG M，et al. Physiological responses to drought stress in 11 different Kentucky bluegrass germplasm and the evaluation of their drought tolerance［J］. Grassland and Turf，2021，41（2）：113‐121.
［27］蔡建国，章毅，孙欧文，等. 绣球抗旱性综合评价及指标体系构建［J］. 应用生态学报，2018，29（10）：3175‐3182.
CAI J G，ZHANG Y，SUN O W，et al. Comprehensive evaluation and construction of drought resistance index system in Hydrangea macrophylla［J］.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology，2018，29（10）：3175‐3182.
［28］李鹏程，柳俊，潘婷，等. 2种水分条件下玉米苗期根系性状QTL分析［J］. 扬州大学学报（农业与生命科学版），2018，39（4）：79‐85.
LI P C，LIU J，PAN T，et al. QTL mapping for root traits in maize seedling under two water supply conditions ［J］. Journal of Yangzhou University（Agricultural and Life Science Edition），2018，39（4）：79‐85.

[1]	NI Tianhong, ZHANG He, XU Hui, GONG Shoufu, ZHANG Yan, CHEN Liwen. Effect of Storage Temperature on Seed Quality of Camellia oleifera Abel [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(1): 173-180.
[2]	XIA Zhenxiang, MENG Zhongju, WU Xiuhua, YANG Chao, ZHANG Xiujun, LIU Qian, HE Xin, WU Jiatong, ZHANG Yanru. Remediation Effects of Protaetia brevitarsis Frass on Chromium‑Arsenic Contaminated Soil‑Cherry Radish System [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 54(9): 103-111.
[3]	JIN Jianghua, XIA Bing, LI Xu, YU Dapeng, GUO Wei, CHEN Tao, WU Wenxin, LI Sijun, WANG Xinyue, HUANG Jie, DENG Xiaohua. Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of Leaf Quality and Economic Traits of Paddy‑Stubble Tobacco with Root Zone Application of Microbial Fertilizer [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 54(8): 82-91.
[4]	LI Chunxin, ZHAI Yunru, WANG Shufeng, CHEN Xiangong, ZHENG Mei, WANG Meng, ZHANG Ge, WANG Huiwei, YUAN Tianyou. Comprehensive Evaluation and Index Screening of Salt‑Alkali Tolerance during the Seedling Stage of Cyperus esculentus [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 54(7): 40-54.
[5]	YUAN Tuantuan, LIU Changbing, BEN Qiuping, DING Zhaofei, WANG Kaiyong, FAN Hua, LI Weinong, LI Zhiqiang. Effects and Comprehensive Evaluation of Different Plant Regulators on Growth of Sugar Beets [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 54(3): 40-49.
[6]	ZHANG Sipu, CUI Wei, ZHANG Ke, LU Yunfeng, MIAO Jianyin, GUO Chaofeng, XIE Yuanming, ZHANG Yanmin, NIU Jiajia. Comprehensive Quality Evaluation of 11 Different Varieties of Pear Paste [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 54(12): 167-180.
[7]	ZHANG Aiqin, GUO Bin, LIU Lilong, LI Xuhua, WANG Qing, XU Rui, ZHANG Huan. Comprehensive Evaluation of Nutritional Quality of Foxtail Millet Based on Principal Component Analysis and Membership Function Method [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 54(1): 28-39.
[8]	QI Tiancheng, LI Yinghai, LI Yangyang. Effects of Different Irrigation and Fertilization Rates on the Growth，Yield and Quality of Fennel [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 54(1): 66-75.
[9]	MIAO Mingjun, LI Jiajia, LEI Xiaokui, LIN Yang, LIAO Jichao, ZHONG Jian, LI Ju, LI Yuejian, CHANG Wei. Growth Response and Tolerance Evaluation of 32 Spinach Varieties to Cadmium Stress [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 53(9): 108-116.
[10]	FENG Peiyuan, DONG Yue, JIAO Zilan, CHEN Min, KONG Weiru, RAN Jie, LI Peifu, TIAN Lei. Comprehensive Evaluation of Salt Tolerance and Genome‑Wide Association Study of Japonica Rice Germplasms at Seedling Stage [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 53(7): 1-9.
[11]	ZHANG Huifang, YAN Zhaoling, LIU Haijiao, DUAN Junzhi, CHEN Haiyan, GUO Yan, WANG Nan, YANG Cuiping, QI Hongzhi. Analysis and Evaluation of Comprehensive Traits of Wheat Varieties in Henan Province Consortium Experiment [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 53(7): 35-43.
[12]	YAN Feng, DONG Yang, ZHAO Fuyang, HOU Xiaomin, LI Qingquan, WANG Lida, LI Qingchao, LIU Yang, ZHANG Lei, LIU Kai. Comprehensive Evaluation of Photosynthetic Performance of Foxtail Millet Varieties and Screening of High Photosynthetic Efficiency Varieties [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 53(5): 40-48.
[13]	YU Mu, HU Yanling, YANG Haitang. Evaluation and Analysis of the Main Phenotypic Traits of 86 Peanut Germplasm Resources [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 53(10): 63-72.
[14]	CHEN Han, HU Huiyun, CHENG Jianfeng, HUANG Yingjin, MAO Xiaorong, XU Xiaoming, ZENG Yanhua. Differences in Natural Enrichment Abilities of Elements in Root Tubers of Different Genotypes of Sweet Potato（Ipomoea batatas Lam.） [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 52(7): 24-39.
[15]	WEI Yuan, LÜ Mengyang, MA Yate, LIU Jing, WANG Xuan, WANG Dongsheng. Comprehensive Evaluation of the Nutritional Quality of Chestnut Based on Three Methods [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 52(6): 111-119.