高浓度CO2 与镉胁迫下水稻幼苗根系淀粉-蔗糖代谢响应

doi:10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2026.07.003

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为揭示高浓度CO₂、镉（Cd）胁迫及其复合胁迫下水稻幼苗根系中淀粉-蔗糖代谢调控机制，设置对照（AC，400 μmol/mol CO₂+0 μmol/L CdCl₂）、Cd处理（Cd，400 μmol/mol CO₂+150 μmol/L CdCl₂）、高浓度CO₂处理（EC，800 μmol/mol CO₂+0 μmol/L CdCl₂）、高浓度CO₂+Cd 处理（EC+Cd，800 μmol/mol CO₂+150 μmol/L CdCl₂），研究不同处理下根系淀粉、蔗糖含量及关键代谢酶活性，筛选不同对比组中的差异表达长链非编码RNA（DE-lncRNA），并探寻DE-lncRNA的潜在顺式调控靶基因，将DE-lncRNA的潜在顺式调控靶基因与淀粉-蔗糖代谢通路中关键酶编码基因取交集，进行调控模式分析。结果表明，与AC处理比较，Cd处理降低水稻根系淀粉含量，显著提高蔗糖含量，显著增强蔗糖转化酶（INV）、β-葡萄糖苷酶（β-Glu）、蔗糖合成酶（SUS）、蔗糖磷酸合成酶（SPS）、α-淀粉酶（α-AMY）、异淀粉酶（ISA）活性，显著抑制己糖激酶（HXK）、β-淀粉酶（β-AMY）活性，促进淀粉降解和蔗糖累积；EC处理降低淀粉含量、升高蔗糖含量，但差异均不显著，显著降低INV、β-Glu活性，显著升高HXK、SUS及α-AMY活性；EC+Cd处理显著降低淀粉含量，显著提高蔗糖含量，显著提升INV、β-Glu、SUS、α-AMY及ISA活性，显著抑制HXK与β-AMY活性。与Cd处理比较，EC+Cd处理降低淀粉和蔗糖含量，但差异不显著，显著增强INV、β-Glu、β-AMY活性，显著抑制SUS、SPS、ISA活性。对不同对比组中的DE-lncRNA及其靶基因进行分析发现，与AC 处理相比，Cd 处理DE-lncRNA MSTRG.18576.11 表达上调并正调控靶基因INV（Os04g0535600），提高INV活性；MSTRG.4063.2与靶基因Os01g094010表达同步下调，降低HXK活性；MSTRG.28469.1、MSTRG.18188.1均表达下调且正调控靶基因（分别为Os08g0509400、Os04g0474500），提高β-Glu活性；MSTRG.12325.1、MSTRG.26969.1均表达上调且负调控靶基因（分别为Os02g0712600、Os08g012400），提高α-AMY活性。EC处理MSTRG.18576.11与靶基因表达同步下调，降低INV活性；MSTRG.4063.2表达下调且负调控靶基因，提高HXK活性；MSTRG.18188.1、MSTRG.28469.1均与靶基因表达同步下调，降低β-Glu活性；MSTRG.12325.1表达上调且负调控靶基因，MSTRG.26969.1表达上调且正调控靶基因，以MSTRG.26969.1正调控作用为主，提高α-AMY活性。EC+Cd处理MSTRG.18576.11与靶基因表达同步上调，提高INV 活性；MSTRG.4063.2 与靶基因表达同步下调，降低HXK 活性；MSTRG.28469.1、MSTRG.18188.1与靶基因表达均同步下调，提高β-Glu活性；MSTRG.12325.1表达上调并负调控靶基因，MSTRG.26969.1表达上调并正调控靶基因，以MSTRG.26969.1正调控效应为主，提高α-AMY活性。与Cd处理相比，EC+Cd处理MSTRG.18576.11表达上调并正调控靶基因，提高INV活性；MSTRG.4063.2表达下调且负调控靶基因，提高HXK活性；MSTRG.28469.1表达上调并正调控靶基因，促进β-Glu 活性升高，MSTRG.18188.1 表达无显著变化但仍可通过调控靶基因提高β-Glu 活性；MSTRG.12325.1表达上调并负调控靶基因，MSTRG.26969.1表达上调并正调控靶基因，使α-AMY活性保持稳定。

关键词: 水稻, 根系, 高浓度CO₂, 镉胁迫, 淀粉-蔗糖代谢响应, 差异表达lncRNA

Abstract: In order to explore the regulatory mechanism of starch⁃sucrose metabolism in rice seedling roots under elevated CO₂（EC），cadmium（Cd） stress，and their combined stress，four treatments were set up，including ambient CO₂ control（AC，400 μmol/mol CO₂ + 0 μmol/L CdCl₂），single Cd stress（Cd，400 μmol/mol CO₂ + 150 μmol/L CdCl₂），single elevated CO₂（EC，800 μmol/mol CO₂ + 0 μmol/L CdCl₂），and combined EC and Cd stress（EC+Cd，800 μmol/mol CO₂ + 150 μmol/L CdCl₂）. The contents of starch and sucrose as well as the activities of key metabolic enzymes in rice seedling roots were studied.Differentially expressed long non⁃coding RNAs（DE⁃lncRNAs）of different comparison groups were screened，and their potential cis⁃regulatory target genes were predicted.The cis⁃target genes were further intersected with key enzyme⁃encoding genes involved in the starch⁃sucrose metabolic pathway to analyze the regulatory patterns. The results showed that compared with the AC treatment，Cd treatment reduced the root starch content，significantly increased the sucrose content，significantly improved the activities of invertase（INV），β⁃glucosidase（β⁃Glu），sucrose synthase（SUS），sucrose phosphate synthase（SPS），α⁃amylase（α⁃AMY） and isoamylase（ISA），and significantly inhibited the activities of hexokinase（HXK）and β⁃amylase（β⁃AMY），thereby promoting starch degradation and sucrose accumulation；EC treatment decreased the starch content，increased the sucrose content，but both changes were not significant，significantly decreased the activities of INV and β⁃Glu，and significantly increased the activities of HXK，SUS and α⁃AMY；EC+Cd treatment significantly decreased the starch content and activities of HXK and β⁃AMY，and significantly increased the sucrose content and activities of INV，β⁃Glu，SUS，α⁃AMY and ISA.Compared with Cd treatment，EC+Cd treatment decreased the contents of starch and sucrose，but the difference was not significant，significantly increased the activities of INV，β⁃Glu and β⁃AMY，and significantly suppressed the activities of SUS，SPS and ISA.Analysis of DE⁃lncRNAs and their cis⁃target genes indicated that，compared with AC treatment，under Cd treatment，MSTRG.18576.11 was upregulated，and positively regulated its target gene INV（Os04g0535600），thereby increasing INV activity； MSTRG. 4063.2 and its target gene Os01g094010 were synchronously downregulated，leading to a reduction in HXK activity； MSTRG.28469.1 and MSTRG.18188.1 were downregulated，and positively regulated their target genes Os08g0509400 and Os04g0474500，respectively，thereby improving β⁃Glu activity； MSTRG. 12325. 1 and MSTRG. 26969.1 were upregulated，and negatively regulated their respective target genes Os02g0712600 and Os08g012400，thereby increasing α⁃AMY activity. Under EC treatment，MSTRG.18576.11 and its target gene were synchronously downregulated to reduce INV activity； MSTRG. 4063.2 was downregulated，and negatively regulated its target gene，resulting in increase of HXK activity； MSTRG. 18188. 1 and MSTRG. 28469.1 were synchronously downregulated along with their target genes，which reduced β⁃Glu activity；MSTRG. 12325.1 was upregulated，negatively regulating its target gene，while MSTRG.26969.1 was upregulated，positively regulating its target gene，the positive regulatory effect of MSTRG. 26969. 1 was dominant，and ultimately increased α⁃AMY activity. Under EC+Cd treatment，MSTRG. 18576. 11 and its target gene were synchronously upregulated to elevate INV activity； MSTRG. 4063.2 and its target gene were synchronously downregulated to decrease HXK activity；MSTRG. 28469.1 and MSTRG.18188.1 were synchronously downregulated along with their target genes，which increased β⁃Glu activity；MSTRG. 12325.1 was upregulated，negatively regulating its target gene，MSTRG. 26969.1 was upregulated，positively regulating its target gene，and the positive regulatory effect of MSTRG. 26969.1 played a dominant role，thereby increasing α⁃AMY activity. Compared with Cd treatment，under EC+Cd treatment，MSTRG.18576.11 was upregulated，and positively regulated its target gene，further increasing INV activity；MSTRG. 4063.2 was downregulated，and negatively regulated its target gene，leading to elevated HXK activity；MSTRG. 28469.1 was upregulated，and positively regulated its target gene to promote the increase of β⁃Glu activity；MSTRG. 18188.1 showed no significant expression change，but still modulated β⁃Glu activity via its target gene；MSTRG. 12325.1 and MSTRG. 26969.1 regulated their target genes through negative and positive modulation，respectively，thereby maintaining the stability of α⁃AMY activity.

Key words: Rice, Roots, Elevated CO₂ concentration, Cadmium stress, Response of starch?sucrose metabolism, Differentially expressed lncRNA

中图分类号:

S511

刘瑷华, 冯紫媛, 温彩霞, 刘文雍, 马琪, 傅俐源, 向兴节, 王兰兰. 高浓度CO₂与镉胁迫下水稻幼苗根系淀粉-蔗糖代谢响应[J]. 河南农业科学, 2026, 55(7): 20-30.

Liu Aihua, Feng Ziyuan, Wen Caixia, Liu Wenyong, Ma Qi, Fu Liyuan, Xiang Xingjie, Wang Lanlan. Response of Starch⁃Sucrose Metabolism in Rice Seedling Roots to Elevated CO_₂ and Cadmium Stress[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(7): 20-30.

图/表 5

参考文献

［1］Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Climate change 2023 synthesis report［EB/OL］.［2025⁃12⁃10］.https：//www. ipcc. ch/report/sixth⁃assessment⁃report⁃cycle/.

［2］National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.Annual greenhouse gas index［EB/OL］.［2025⁃12⁃10］.https：//www. esrl. noaa. gov/gmd/aggi/.

［3］金奖铁，李扬，李荣俊，等. 大气二氧化碳浓度升高影响植物生长发育的研究进展［J］. 植物生理学报，2019，55（5）：558⁃568.

Jin J T，Li Y，Li R J，et al. Research progress on the influence of elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration on plant growth and development［J］. Plant Physiology Communications，2019，55（5）：558⁃568.

［4］陈思静，杜爱林，李伏生. 不同滴灌施肥处理对种植马铃薯土壤有机碳组分和酶活性的影响［J］. 华南农业大学学报，2022，43（3）：34⁃41.

Chen S J，Du A L，Li F S. Effects of different drip fertigation treatments on organic carbon fraction and enzyme activity in potato⁃planting soil［J］.Journal of South China Agricultural University，2022，43（3）：34⁃41.

［5］Sanz⁃sáez A，Erice G，Aranjuelo I，et al. Photosynthetic down⁃regulation under elevated CO₂ exposure can be prevented by nitrogen supply in nodulated alfalfa［J］.Journal of Plant Physiology，2010，167（18）：1558⁃1565.

［6］Aoki N，Ono K，Sasaki H，et al. Effects of elevatedCO₂concentration on photosynthetic carbon metabolism in flag⁃leaf blades of rice before and after heading［J］.Plant Production Science，2003，6（1）：52⁃58.

［7］陈雅丽，翁莉萍，马杰，等. 近十年中国土壤重金属污染源解析研究进展［J］. 农业环境科学学报，2019，38（10）：2219⁃2238.

Chen Y L，Weng L P，Ma J，et al. Review on the last ten years of research on source identification of heavy metal pollution in soils［J］. Journal of Agro⁃Environment Science，2019，38（10）：2219⁃2238.

［8］赵慧，何博，孟晶，等. 典型城市化地区蔬菜重金属的累积特征与健康风险研究［J］. 中国生态农业学报（中英文），2019，27（12）：1892⁃1902.

Zhao H，He B，Meng J，et al. Study on accumulation characteristics and health risks of heavy metals in vegetables in typical urbanization areas［J］. Chinese Journal of Eco⁃Agriculture，2019，27（12）：1892⁃1902.

［9］Jomova K，Alomar S Y，Nepovimova E，et al. Heavy metals：toxicity and human health effects［J］. Archives of Toxicology，2025，99（1）：153⁃209.

［10］邹长伟，江玉洁，黄虹，等. 重金属镉的分布、暴露与健康风险评价研究进展［J］. 生态毒理学报，2022，17（6）：225⁃243.

Zou C W，Jiang Y J，Huang H，et al. Research progress on distribution，exposure and health risk assessment of heavy metal cadmium ［J］. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology，2022，17（6）：225⁃243.

［11］Shao Y T，Zheng L T，jiang Y G. Cadmium toxicity and autophagy：a review［J］. BioMetals，2024，37（3）：609⁃629.

［12］Li Z Y，Tang S R，Deng X F，et al. Contrasting effects of elevated CO2 on Cu and Cd uptake by different rice varieties grown on contaminated soils with two levels of metals：implication for phytoextraction and food safety［J］.Journal of Hazardous Materials，2010，177（1/2/3）：352⁃361.

［13］李中阳，宋正国，樊向阳，等. CO2浓度升高对不同水稻品种幼苗养分吸收和根系形态的影响［J］. 植物营养与肥料学报，2013，19（1）：20⁃25.
Li Z Y，Song Z G，Fan X Y，et al. Effects of elevated CO₂ on nutrient element uptakes and root morphology of different rice varieties［J］. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers，2013，19（1）：20⁃25.

［14］沈一尘，涂晨，邱炜，等. 镉污染土壤上不同水稻品种的镉积累与减污潜力［J］. 生态与农村环境学报，2023，39（4）：547⁃555.
Shen Y C，Tu C，Qiu W，et al. Cadmium accumulation and pollution reduction potential of different rice varieties on cadmium⁃contaminated soils［J］. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment，2023，39（4）：547⁃555.

［15］李蓓，莫凯琴，马银花. 水稻卷叶基因研究进展［J］. 安徽农学通报，2021，27（6）：14⁃18.
Li B，Mo K Q，Ma Y H. Research advances in rice leaf⁃rolling genes［J］. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin，2021，27（6）：14⁃18.

［16］巫瑶. 水稻镉高积累材料根部镉积累机制［D］. 雅安：四川农业大学，2020.
Wu Y. Cadmium accumulation mechanism in root of high cadmium accumulating rice line［D］. Ya’an：Sichuan Agricultural University，2020.

［17］余四斌，熊银，肖景华，等. 杂交稻与绿色超级稻［J］. 科学通报，2016，61（35）：3797⁃3803.
Yu S B，Xiong Y，Xiao J H，et al. Hybrid rice and green super rice［J］. Chinese Science Bulletin，2016，61（35）：3797⁃3803.

［18］江淑珍，连辉，熊远芳，等. 锥栗β-淀粉酶基因家族的全基因组鉴定与分析［J］. 森林与环境学报，2021，41（5）：545⁃553.
Jiang S Z，Lian H，Xiong Y F，et al. Genome⁃wide identification and analysis of β⁃amylase gene family in Castanea henryi［J］. Journal of Forest and Environment，2021，41（5）：545⁃553.

［19］Kalai T，Khamassi K，da Silva J A T，et al. Cadmium and copper stress affect seedling growth and enzymatic activities in germinating barley seeds［J］. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science，2014，60（6）：765⁃783.

［20］Ahammed G J，Li X，Liu A R，et al. Physiological and defense responses of tea plants to elevated CO2：a
review［J］. Frontiers in Plant Science，2020，11：305.

［21］郝蕴彰，李萍，宗毓铮，等. 大气CO2浓度和气温升高对藜麦生长及碳氮代谢的影响［J］. 核农学报，2023，37（6）：1279⁃1287.
Hao Y Z，Li P，Zong Y Z，et al. Effects of elevated CO₂ concentration and increased air temperature on growth and the metabolism of carbon and nitrogen in quinoa（Chenopodium quinoa Willd）［J］. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences，2023，37（6）：1279⁃1287.

［22］王笑，蔡剑，周琴，等. 非生物逆境锻炼提高作物耐逆性的生理机制研究进展［J］. 中国农业科学，2021，54（11）：2287⁃2301.
Wang X，Cai J，Zhou Q，et al. Advances in physiological mechanisms of abiotic stress priming improving crop stress tolerance［J］. Scientia Agricultura Sinica，2021，54（11）：2287⁃2301.

［23］徐慧，薛媛. 银白杨对干旱胁迫的生理响应研究［J］. 林业科学研究，2024，37（4）：166⁃173.
Xu H，Xue Y. Physiological responses of Populus alba to drought stress［J］. Forest Research，2024，37（4）：166⁃173.

［24］Chen M，Zhu C，Zhang H，et al. Endogenous γ⁃aminobutyric acid accumulation enhances salinity tolerance in rice［J］. Plants，2024，13（19）：2750.

［25］Feng Z Y，Wang X Y，Luo Z H，et al. Identification and expression analysis of lncRNAs in rice roots（Oryza sativa L.） under elevated CO2 concentration and/or cadmium stress［J］. Genomics，2025，117（1）：110980.

［26］张志良，瞿伟菁，李小方. 植物生理学实验指导［M］. 4 版. 北京：高等教育出版社，2009：120⁃125.
Zhang Z L，Qu W J，Li X F. Experimental guidance for plant physiology［M］. 4th ed. Beijing：Higher Education Press，2009：120⁃125.

［27］黄彦郡. 外源脱落酸和褪黑素对干旱胁迫下棉花叶片碳代谢、抗氧化代谢的影响［D］. 南京：南京农业大学，2020.
Huang Y J. Effects of exogenous abscisic acid and melatonin on carbon metabolism and antioxidant metabolism in cotton leaves under drought stress［D］.Nanjing：Nanjing Agricultural University，2020.

［28］刘丹阳，周昊，颜洋洋，等. 不同干燥方式对马蓝叶的β- 葡萄糖苷酶活性和药效成分的影响［J］. 生物质化学工程，2023，57（6）：32⁃36.
Liu D Y，Zhou H，Yan Y Y，et al. Effects of different drying methods on β⁃glucosidase activity and effective components of Baphicacanthus cusia［J］. Biomass Chemical Engineering，2023，57（6）：32⁃36.

［29］张明方，李志凌，陈昆松，等. 网纹甜瓜发育果实糖分积累与蔗糖代谢参与酶的关系［J］. 植物生理与分子生物学学报，2003，29（5）：455⁃462.
Zhang M F，Li Z L，Chen K S，et al. Relationship between sugar accumulation and sucrose metabolism participating enzymes in developing fruits of muskmelon［J］. Journal of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology，2003，29（5）：455⁃462.

［30］Huber S C，Akazawa T. A novel sucrose synthase pathway for sucrose degradation in cultured sycamore cells［J］. Plant Physiology，1986，81（4）：1008⁃1013.

［31］李小方，张志良. 植物生理学实验指导［M］. 5版. 北京：高等教育出版社，2016.
Li X F，Zhang Z L. Plant physiology experiment guide ［M］. 5th ed. Beijing：Higher Education Press，2016.

［32］赵令敏. 淀粉-蔗糖代谢对山药（Dioscorea opposita Thunb.）块茎膨大调控机制的研究［D］. 呼和浩特：内蒙古农业大学，2023.
Zhao L M. Study on the regulatory mechanism of starch⁃sucrose metabolism on tuber expansion of chinese yam（Dioscorea opposite Thunb.）［D］. Hohhot：Inner Mongolia Agricultural University，2023.

［33］Dong S Y，Beckles D M. Dynamic changes in the starch⁃sugar interconversion within plant source and sink tissues promote a better abiotic stress response［J］.Journal of Plant Physiology，2019，234：80⁃93.
［34］Thalmann M，Santelia D. Starch as a determinant of plant fitness under abiotic stress［J］. The New Phytologist，2017，214（3）：943⁃951.
［35］王蕊，张风琴，田蕾，等. 不同水稻抗性淀粉含量差异的转录组学解析［J］. 江西农业大学学报，2024，46（5）：1109⁃1123.
Wang R，Zhang F Q，Tian L，et al. Transcriptome analysis of differences in resistant starch content in different rice cultivars［J］. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis，2024，46（5）：1109⁃1123.
［36］Fulton D C，Stettler M，Mettler T，et al. Beta⁃AMYLASE4，a noncatalytic protein required for starch breakdown，acts upstream of three active beta⁃amylases in Arabidopsis chloroplasts［J］. The Plant Cell，2008，20（4）：1040⁃1058.
［37］Mccoy J G，Ren Z N，Stanevich V，et al. The structure of a sugar transporter of the glucose EⅡC superfamily provides insight into the elevator mechanism of membrane transport［J］. Structure，2016，24（6）：956⁃964.
［38］梁国平. β-淀粉酶调控糖代谢参与葡萄的抗寒机理研究［D］. 兰州：甘肃农业大学，2022.
Liang G P. Study on the mechanism of cold resistance via β⁃amylase regulating sugar metabolism in grapes［D］.Lanzhou：Gansu Agricultural University，2022.
［39］吴坤林，黎广松，闵义. 转录组学揭示MeFtsZ2-1基因过量表达对木薯糖代谢的影响［J］. 分子植物育种，2022，20（24）：8043⁃8050.
Wu K L，Li G S，Min Y. Transcriptomics reveals the effect of MeFtsZ2‑1 gene overexpression on cassava sugar metabolism［J］. Molecular Plant Breeding，2022，20（24）：8043⁃8050.
［40］张东方，崔大方，赵赣，等. 植物叶片暂时淀粉分解途径研究进展［J］. 西北植物学报，2011，31（9）：1927⁃1932.
Zhang D F，Cui D F，Zhao G，et al. Advance on the pathway of transitory starch degradation in leaves［J］.Acta Botanica Boreali⁃Occidentalia Sinica，2011，31（9）：1927⁃1932.
［41］Edner C，Li J，Albrecht T，et al. Glucan，water dikinase activity stimulates breakdown of starch granules by plastidial β⁃amylases［J］. Plant Physiology，2007，145（1）：17⁃28.
［42］王云飞，赵法茂，李天骄，等. 小麦籽粒灌浆过程中淀粉去分支酶的类型、活性及其纯化［J］. 作物学报，2007，33（11）：1840⁃1844.
Wang Y F，Zhao F M，Li T J，et al. Type，activity，and purification of starch⁃debranching enzymes during grain filling period in wheat［J］. Acta Agronomica Sinica，2007，33（11）：1840⁃1844.
［43］王玮，程远，叶青静，等. 植物蔗糖合酶生理生化功能研究进展［J］. 华北农学报，2023，38（S1）：261⁃270.
Wang W，Cheng Y，Ye Q J，et al. Advances in physiological and biochemical functions of plant sucrose synthase［J］. Acta Agriculturae Boreali⁃Sinica，2023，38（S1）：261⁃270.

［44］Zdunek⁃Zastocka E，Michniewska B，Pawlicka A，et al.Cadmium alters the metabolism and perception of abscisic acid in Pisum sativum leaves in a developmentally specific manner［J］. International Journal of Molecular Sciences，2024，25（12）：6582.

［45］何俊瑜，任艳芳，任明见，等. 镉对不同小麦品种种子萌发的影响［J］. 中国农学通报，2009，25（10）：235⁃240.
He J Y，Ren Y F，Ren M J，et al. Effects of cadmium on seed germination of different wheat varieties［J］.Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin，2009，25（10）：235⁃240.

［46］高婷. 内生真菌侵染对铝和/或镉胁迫下水稻幼苗光合特性及碳氮代谢的影响［D］. 沈阳：沈阳师范大学，2021.
Gao T. Effects of endophytic fungi infection on photosynthetic characteristics and carbon and nitrogen metabolism of rice seedlings under aluminum and/or cadmium stress［D］. Shenyang：Shenyang Normal University，2021.
［47］Liao G L，Li Y Q，Wang H L，et al. Genome⁃wide identification and expression profiling analysis of sucrose synthase（SUS） and sucrose phosphate synthase（SPS） genes family in Actinidia chinensis and A.eriantha［J］. BMC Plant Biology，2022，22（1）：215.
［48］Karni L，Aloni B. Fructokinase and hexokinase from pollen grains of bell pepper（Capsicum annuum L.）：Possible role in pollen germination under conditions of high temperature and CO₂ enrichment［J］. Annals of Botany，2002，90（5）：607⁃612.
［49］牟雪姣，张强，吴燕，等. 外源CO对干旱胁迫下黄瓜种子萌发生长的缓解效应［J］. 华北农学报，2018，33（5）：168⁃173.
Mu X J，Zhang Q，Wu Y，et al. Alleviating effects of exogenous CO on germination and growth of cucumber seeds under drought stress［J］. Acta Agriculturae Boreali⁃Sinica，2018，33（5）：168⁃173.
［50］Wang X H，Zou J Y，Qi X F，et al. High concentration of CO₂ improve the Pb resistance of Oryza sativa L. seedlings by enhancing photosynthesis and regulating plant endogenous hormones［J］. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation，2022，41（8）：3556⁃3567.
［51］孙凤杰，罗淑芬，颜廷才，等. 氯吡苯脲处理对莲子细胞壁多糖降解特性的影响［J］. 食品科学，2019，40（5）：242⁃249.
Sun F J，Luo S F，Yan T C，et al. Effect of 1（⁃2⁃chloropyridin⁃4⁃yl）⁃3⁃phenylurea treatment on degradation characteristics of cell wall polysaccharides in Lotus seeds［J］. Food Science，2019，40（5）：242⁃249.

[1]	王明, 江勋, 高珑翡, 史盛巧, 李燕丽, 卢碧林. 基于无人机多光谱影像的直播水稻氮含量监测[J]. 河南农业科学, 2026, 55(7): 157-166.
[2]	周荆航, 王增昊, 张磊, 张夏, 刘佳佳, 胡铁柱, 张大众. 不同硫族元素添加量、处理及预处理时长对镉胁迫下小麦幼苗镉吸收转运的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2026, 55(6): 1-10.
[3]	李勇勇, 余亚洁, 徐尤兴, 魏赛金. 链霉菌JD211 菌剂对水稻生长发育、氮代谢及产量的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2026, 55(3): 28-37.
[4]	杨阳, 李亚东, 付景, 周成杰, 郭俊红, 刘海静. 基于AMMI 模型和GGE 双标图的河南省水稻区域试验综合评价[J]. 河南农业科学, 2026, 55(2): 12-20.
[5]	李艳华, 李春阳, 吴晓林, 王伟, 刘辉. 玉米IDL 基因家族的全基因组鉴定及在根系发育中的表达分析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2026, 55(1): 52-64.
[6]	郭晓琴, 李钦奎, 武广鹏, 张小全. 干旱胁迫下生物炭复合保水剂配施丛枝菌根真菌对烟草生长及土壤微环境的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2026, 55(1): 88-100.
[7]	李喜凤, 胥子航, 吴鑫雨, 苑征征, 陈玉凤, 郭景丽. 褐藻寡糖与虾青素对盐胁迫下生菜生长的缓解效果及机制[J]. 河南农业科学, 2026, 55(1): 118-131.
[8]	苟瑞丽, 舍杨梦斐, 方晶莹, 田浩天, 马国林, 田蕾, 罗成科. 不同耐盐碱类型水稻根系对盐碱胁迫的生理及分子响应差异[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(9): 34-42.
[9]	江勋, 刘伟, 张大弘, 游昊, 付斌, 李燕丽, 卢碧林. 基于无人机遥感技术的直播水稻叶片SPAD 值监测[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(9): 149-158.
[10]	黄世鹏, 何虎强, 李光照, 陈传鑫, 钟拓, 谢剑波, 周湘晚, 王丹, 肖应辉. 水稻苗期耐旱性全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(7): 12-20.
[11]	张震, 周磊, 陈永忠, 张英, 王瑞, 缪子琪, 李志钢, 龙玲, 许彦明. 缓释肥施用量对油茶容器苗生长及养分含量的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(6): 63-71.
[12]	柏程瀚, 吉林爽, 王斯文, 刘亮, 马巍, 刘晓亮, 杨永志, 孙一楠, 郭万卿, 林喆, 侯林含, 朴锦, 侯立刚. 秸秆还田条件下穗分化期水分调控对水稻叶片光合特性和产量的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(5): 31-40.
[13]	王莹莹, 段良霞, 赵怡凝, 孙广睿, 杨丽红, 周清, 谢红霞. 基于面向对象与机器学习融合的南方山区水稻识别研究[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(4): 144-154.
[14]	蔡昱萌, 汪颖, 何飞, 刘燕清, 刘静妍, 郭彦丽, 孙玥, 苏京平, 王胜军, 李军玲. 水稻蔗糖转运蛋白OsSUT4基因的克隆与功能分析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(3): 1-7.
[15]	梁亚男, 邬梦晞, 肖雍琴, 曾鲸津, 段益莉. 植物根际促生菌和褪黑素对大花金鸡菊抗氧化特性和砷吸收的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(3): 87-98.

高浓度CO₂与镉胁迫下水稻幼苗根系淀粉-蔗糖代谢响应

Response of Starch⁃Sucrose Metabolism in Rice Seedling Roots to Elevated CO_₂ and Cadmium Stress

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics