Effect of Intercropping Modes between Millet and Mung
 Bean on Their Growth and Yields

doi:10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2019.10.006

Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences ›› 2019, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (10): 37-40.DOI: 10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2019.10.006

• Crop Cultivation & Genetic Breeding • Previous Articles Next Articles

Effect of Intercropping Modes between Millet and Mung Bean on Their Growth and Yields

XUE Ｒenfeng,ZHAO Yang,WANG Yingjie,CHEN Jian,GE Weide

(Crop Ｒesearch Institute,Liaoning Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Shenyang 110161,China)

Received:2019-03-10 Published:2019-10-15 Online:2019-10-15

间作模式对谷子与绿豆生长和产量的影响

薛仁风，赵阳，王英杰，陈剑，葛维德

(辽宁省农业科学院作物研究所，辽宁沈阳110161）

通讯作者: 葛维德(1973-)，男，辽宁沈阳人，研究员，硕士，主要从事食用豆选育研究。E-mail:snowweide@163.com
作者简介:薛仁风(1982-)，男，辽宁沈阳人，副研究员，博士，主要从事绿豆、小豆抗病育种研究。E-mail:xuerf82@163.com
基金资助:
辽宁省科学事业公益研究基金项目（20180018）；国家食用豆现代农业产业技术体系项目(CARS-08-Z7) ；辽宁省中央引导地方科技发展专项资金项目（2018416023）

Abstract

Abstract: In order to screen out the best intercropping mode between millet and mung bean which was suitable for Liaoning Province，this study compared the effects of different intercropping modes between millet and mung bean on their yields,agronomic traits,physiological indexes and economic benefits,which could lay important foundation for ensuring income of farmers in Northeast of China.The results showed that millets of 4 ∶ 2 intercropping mode between millet and mung bean had height of 135.8 cm,stem diameter of 0.65 cm,stem weight of 10.1 g,spike length of 21.5 cm and single ear weight of 18.3 g,which were all significantly higher than those of 2 ∶ 1 intercropping and monoculture modes.The intercropping modes could activate the antioxidant enzymes in millets.The root length and plant height of intercropped mung bean increased significantly，and the 2 ∶ 1 intercropping mode between millet and mung bean was greater than 4∶ 2 intercropping mode.The main stem branch number,pod number per plant，pod length,grain number of pod and 100-grain weight of intercropped mung bean were all lower than those of mung beans of monoculture mode.The 4∶ 2 intercropping mode between millet and mung bean had the highest profit of 22 185.93 Yuan/ha,which increased by 27.1% compared with millet monoculture mode，and was 4.95 times of mung bean monoculture mode．

Key words: Millet, Mung bean, Intercropping, Agronomic traits, Physiological characteristics

摘要：

为筛选出适合辽宁省的最佳谷子与绿豆间作模式，比较了谷子与绿豆不同间作模式对谷子和绿豆产量、农艺性状、生理指标及经济效益的影响，为保障东北地区农民收入奠定重要基础。结果表明，谷子与绿豆4∶2间作模式的谷子株高达135.8 cm，茎粗达0.65 cm，茎秆质量为10.1 g，穗长为21.5 cm，单穗质量为18.3 g，总体上均显著高于2∶1间作和单作谷子，间作模式还能够激活谷子抗氧化酶活性；间作绿豆的根长和株高增加，且谷子与绿豆2∶1间作模式大于4∶2间作模式，间作绿豆主茎分枝数、单株荚数、荚长、荚粒数、百粒质量均低于单作绿豆。谷子与绿豆4∶2间作模式的经济效益和利润最高，纯利润可达22 185.93元/hm²，相比单作谷子增加27.1%，相比单作绿豆增加3.95倍。

关键词: 谷子, 绿豆, 间作, 农艺性状, 生理特性

CLC Number:

S515
S522

XUE Ｒenfeng, ZHAO Yang, WANG Yingjie, CHEN Jian, GE Weide. Effect of Intercropping Modes between Millet and Mung Bean on Their Growth and Yields[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 48(10): 37-40.

薛仁风, 赵阳, 王英杰, 陈剑, 葛维德. 间作模式对谷子与绿豆生长和产量的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2019, 48(10): 37-40.

References

［1］代小冬，杨育峰，杨国红，等.谷子品种联合鉴定试验与评价［J］. 河南农业科学，2015,44(7):25-28.

［2］薛仁风，陈剑，赵阳，等.绿豆病毒病田间绿色防治方法及其对绿豆生长特性的影响［J］.河南农业科学，2019,48(3):90-94.

［3］龙朝学.浅析农作物间作套种技术［J］.民营科技,2016(3):211.

［4］马秀杰.间作对绿豆生物性状、产量和品质的影响［J］.核农学报，2014，28（3）：546-551.

［5］蔡丽丽.洮南市“绿豆-玉米”间作覆膜模式的农业气候研究［D］.成都：成都信息工程大学，2015.

［6］闫锋，崔秀辉，王成，等.玉米绿豆间作效应分析［J］.安徽农业科学，2013，41（27）：10931-10932.

［7］李少明，赵平，范茂攀，等.玉米大豆间作条件下氮素养分吸收利用研究［J］.云南农业大学学报，2004，19（5）：572-574.

［8］冯良山，孙占祥，郑家明，等.不同水肥条件对间作花生和谷子水分养分利用的影响［J］.干旱地区农业研究,2015,33(5):24-29.

［9］田建全,王连芬,李国斌,等.间作条件下水肥运筹对花生和谷子产量的影响［J］.园艺与种苗,2014(12):54-57.

［10］李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术［M］.北京：高等教育出版社，2000.

［11］路明，王艳东，许明丽，等.甲基茉莉酸对悬浮培养南方红豆杉细胞自由基清除系统酶的影响［J］.中草药，2002，33(11)：985-988.

［12］门洪文,郭守鹏,朱利,等.玉米间作绿豆或红小豆的经济效益分析［J］.安徽农业科学,2018,46(12)：45-47.

［13］邱风仓,冯小磊,张文英.杂交谷子旱地间作高效技术研究［J］.中国种业,2014(5)：54-55.

［14］薛仁风,赵阳,庄艳，等.几种除草剂对绿豆田杂草的防治效果及对绿豆表型性状的影响［J］.河南农业科学,2015,44(4):101-105.

[1]	MU Lan, XUE Shiming, ZANG Qingji, LIU Yanpei, DUAN Jiaxin, CAI Ming, ZHANG Meiyan. Study on Intercropping Patterns and Silage Quality of Gramineous Forage and Leguminous Forage in Alpine Area of Shangri‑La [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 53(1): 78-86.
[2]	LI Junxia, MA Xiaoqian, DAI Shutao, QIN Na, SONG Yinghui, ZHU Cancan, LIU Haixia, JIN Songcan. Research Progress on Quality Traits of Foxtail Millet [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 52(9): 14-23.
[3]	ZHAO Lishang, WANG Xiangsheng, GAO Nanan, HAN Pengbin, LI Jie, REN Yongzhe, LIN Tongbao, WANG Zhiqiang, LIAN Yanhao. Effects of Intercropping of Two Genotypes of Wheat on Grain Filling Characteristics and Yield [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 52(8): 18-25.
[4]	FAN Xiaoqing, ZHAO Xinyue, WANG Yuwen, ZHANG Liangyao, YUAN Jincheng, LIU Yinghui, WENG Qiaoyun. Effect of Intercropping of Silage Corn and Forage Rape on Forage Crop Yield and Quality [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 52(7): 40-51.
[5]	LI Xin, ZHANG Meizhen, ZHENG Qiaochu, LIU Quan, HUANG Yulan, YIN Kuide. Effect of ACC Deaminase⁃Producing Bacteria on Rooting of Mung Bean Cuttings under Saline⁃Alkali Stress [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 52(7): 52-59.
[6]	XU Doudou, HE Yunxin, LI Fei, LIU Aiyu, ZHOU Zhonghua. Research Progress of Intercropping Patterns in Cotton Fields [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 52(6): 1-11.
[7]	SONG Penghui, JIAO Kuibao, LI Yuze, YANG Ruihua, ZHANG Lei, DUAN Yadong, ZHANG Kun, WU Xinjuan, ZHOU Shuang, WANG Mingjie. Screening of Trap Plant Intercropping with Strawberry and Its Trapping Effect on Frankliniella occidentalis [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 52(4): 82-89.
[8]	YUE Hewei, LI Lianzhen, WANG Yuqing, WANG Rongrong, LIU Yang, WEI Junjie, CHANG Jianfeng. Effect of IAA on Seed Germination and Physiological Characteristics of Polygonatum sibiricum Red. [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 52(3): 64-72.
[9]	ZHU Cancan, FU Senjie, QIN Na, WANG Chunyi, DAI Shutao, SONG Yinghui, WEI Xin, LI Junxia. Effects of Phosphorus Fertilizer Application Depth on Root Distribution，Nitrogen Uptake and Utilization and Yield of Foxtail Millet [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 52(12): 22-30.
[10]	LI Xiangchun, SUI Yihu, TANG Jingwen, HU Nengbing. Effects of the Combination of Four Cultivation Factors on Agronomic，Fruit Traits and Yield of the Intercropping Systerm of Watermelon‐Pepper in Greenhouses [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 52(12): 116-126.
[11]	ZHANG Hongtao, LUO Yiming, TAN Lian, YANG Jiapeng, WANG Yu. Research on Millet Disease Identification Based on Transfer Learning and Residual Network [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 52(12): 162-171.
[12]	YIN Quanyu, KUANG Zhihao, WANG Jing, REN Tianbao, ZHANG Songtao, JI Xiaoming, LIU Guoshun, MU Yaohui. Physiological Responses of Different Black Shank⁃Resistance Flue⁃cured Tobacco Varieties to Trichoderma harzianum [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 51(9): 88-98.
[13]	GUO Hui, ZHOU Hui, ZHUANG Jingjing, WANG Xiaobing. Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Wheat Physiological Characteristics and Rhizosphere Soil Enzyme Activities under Cadmium Stress [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 51(8): 20-27.
[14]	MA Haizhao, XIE Chenghui, XU Xiyang, FENG Yongzhong, HUANG Guibin, KONG Dejie, GAO Pengfei, MEI Zhikun, REN Guangxin. Effects of Nitrogen Rate on Biomass and Stoichiometric Characteristics of Carbon，Nitrogen and Phosphorus of Proso Millet [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 51(7): 31-41.
[15]	LUO Shiwu, LI Kai, LAI Xingliang, CHENG Bingwen. Effects of Different Kinds of Plastic Film Mulching on Soil Moisture，Temperature，Foxtail Millet Growth and Yield [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 51(7): 42-50.

Effect of Intercropping Modes between Millet and Mung Bean on Their Growth and Yields

间作模式对谷子与绿豆生长和产量的影响

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics