不同类型烟叶干馏香料制备及在加热卷烟中的应用

doi:10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2025.12.015

河南农业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (12): 148-166.DOI: 10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2025.12.015

• 农业信息与工程·农产品加工 • 上一篇下一篇

不同类型烟叶干馏香料制备及在加热卷烟中的应用

徐达¹，李嘉欣²，王宣静³，郭磊¹，李立鹏²，柳维¹，田耀伟¹，孙正光¹，孙强¹，许春平²

（1.江西中烟工业有限责任公司，江西南昌 330096；2.郑州轻工业大学烟草科学与工程学院，河南郑州 450002；3.广东中烟工业有限责任公司技术中心,广东广州 510385）

收稿日期:2025-02-07 接受日期:2025-03-27 出版日期:2025-12-15 发布日期:2025-12-12
通讯作者: 许春平（1977-），男，河南焦作人，教授，博士，主要从事生物化工与烟草工程研究。E-mail：xuchunping05@163.com
作者简介:徐达（1987-），男，湖北咸宁人，高级工程师，硕士，主要从事烟用香料和烟草生物技术研究。E-mail：xuda99@126.com
基金资助:
中国烟草总公司重大科技项目［110202201005（JY-05）］；河南省重大科技专项（231100310200）

Preparation of Different Types of Tobacco Leaf Dry Distilled Flavor and Application in Heated Cigarettes

XU Da¹，LI Jiaxin²，WANG Xuanjing3，GUO Lei¹，LI Lipeng²，LIU Wei¹，TIAN Yaowei¹，SUN Zhengguang¹，SUN Qiang¹，XU Chunping²

（1.China Tobacco Jiangxi Industry Co.，Ltd.，Nanchang 330096，China；2.College of Tobacco Science and Engineering，Zhengzhou University of Light Industry，Zhengzhou 450002，China；3.Technical Center，China Tobacco Guangdong Industrial Co.，Ltd.，Guangzhou 510385，China）

Received:2025-02-07 Accepted:2025-03-27 Published:2025-12-15 Online:2025-12-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为拓展加热卷烟核心香料来源，选取烤烟、晒黄烟、白肋烟与香料烟为原料，应用干馏工艺制备香料，并系统考察了其挥发性成分差异及应用效果。首先，测定4种烟叶的常规化学成分含量，随后制备干馏香料并计算提取率，结合气相色谱-质谱联用（GC-MS）与主成分分析探究挥发性成分组成差异，最后通过感官评吸评估其增香效果。结果表明，白肋烟的烟碱和总氮含量显著高于其他烟叶，晒黄烟的总糖和还原糖含量最高，烤烟各项化学成分较为均衡；干馏香料提取率依次为烤烟2.8%、香料烟2.7%、晒黄烟2.5%、白肋烟1.5%；GC-MS共鉴定出205种挥发性成分，总含量分别为烤烟7 024.00 μg/g、晒黄烟1 407.79 μg/g、白肋烟3 881.90 μg/g、香料烟6 951.56 μg/g，其中，酮类、酚类和杂环类化合物为主要致香成分；主成分分析表明，烤烟与香料烟干馏香料香气组成较为相似，白肋烟和晒黄烟则呈明显差异；感官评价显示，添加干馏香料均可提升加热卷烟的抽吸品质，其中，烤烟干馏香料效果最佳，在香气量、甜润感和劲头方面改善效果明显。综上，烤烟干馏香料组分协调，挥发性成分含量较高，焦甜与烟熏香突出，可有效弥补加热卷烟香气释放不足的问题。

关键词: 加热卷烟, 干馏香料, 气相色谱-质谱联用, 主成分分析, 感官评吸

Abstract: To expand the core flavor source of heated cigarettes，flue⁃cured tobacco，sun⁃cured yellow tobacco，burley tobacco and oriental tobacco were selected as raw materials to prepare flavors by dry distillation process. Firstly，the contents of conventional chemical components in four kinds of tobacco leaves were determined.Then，the dry distillation flavors were prepared and the extraction rate was calculated.The composition differences of volatile components were explored by GC⁃MS and principal component analysis.Finally，the aroma⁃enhancing effect was evaluated by sensory evaluation.The results showed that the nicotine and total nitrogen contents of burley tobacco were significantly higher than those of other tobacco leaves，the total sugar and reducing sugar contents of sun⁃cured yellow tobacco were the highest，and the chemical components of flue⁃cured tobacco were more balanced.The extraction rate of dry distillation perfume was 2. 8% for flue⁃cured tobacco，2.7% for oriental tobacco，2.5% for sun⁃cured yellow tobacco and 1.5% for burley tobacco. A total of 205 volatile components were identified by GC⁃MS，and the total contents were 7 024.00 μg/g for flue⁃cured tobacco，1 407.79 μg/g for sun⁃cured yellow tobacco，3 881. 90 μg/g for burley tobacco and 6 951. 56 μg/g for oriental tobacco，respectively.Phenols，ketones and heterocyclic compounds were the main aroma components. Principal component analysis showed that the aroma components of flue⁃cured tobacco and oriental tobacco were similar，while burley tobacco and sun⁃cured yellow tobacco were significantly different.The sensory evaluation showed that the addition of dry distillation flavors could improve the smoking quality of heated cigarettes.Among them，the effect of flue⁃cured tobacco dry distillation flavor was the best，and the improvement effect was significant in aroma quantity，sweetness and strength.In summary，the aroma components of flue⁃cured tobacco are coordinated，the content of volatile components is high，and the burnt sweet and smoked aroma are prominent，which can effectively make up for the problem of insufficient aroma release of heated cigarettes.

Key words: Heated cigarette, Dry distillation flavor, Gas chromatography?mass spectrometry, Principal component analysis, Sensory evaluation

中图分类号:

徐达, 李嘉欣, 王宣静, 郭磊, 李立鹏, 柳维, 田耀伟, 孙正光, 孙强, 许春平. 不同类型烟叶干馏香料制备及在加热卷烟中的应用[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(12): 148-166.

XU Da, LI Jiaxin, WANG Xuanjing, GUO Lei, LI Lipeng, LIU Wei, TIAN Yaowei, SUN Zhengguang, SUN Qiang, XU Chunping. Preparation of Different Types of Tobacco Leaf Dry Distilled Flavor and Application in Heated Cigarettes[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 54(12): 148-166.

[1]	陈震, 管庆林, 刘化冰, 蒋健, 卢昕博, 董淑雅, 武云杰, 吴键. 基于代谢组学的不同产区加热卷烟原料品质分析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(9): 159-170.
[2]	吴晋禄, 胡安福, 蒋健, 夏倩, 王骏, 肖卫强, 周国俊, 吴键, 徐建, 方梦祥. 加热卷烟水分生成及迁移释放规律研究进展[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(8): 15-25.
[3]	薛云, 刘启斌, 吴彦, 李京鑫, 胡紫雲, 陆漓, 李典, 严俊, 黄忠辉, 景延秋. 基于定性定量联用技术的加热卷烟气溶胶中醇类、酯类、酮类香味物质分析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(6): 163-174.
[4]	张改红, 许航, 杜帅, 徐月莹, 石栋栋, 薛晶晶, 王梦瑶, 毛多斌. 愈创木酚-β-D-葡萄糖苷的稳定性及其在卷烟加香中的应用[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(5): 172-180.
[5]	罗海涛, 王硕赢, 齐雅婷, 李瑞丽, 陈栋, 饶超奇, 张峻松, 邹恩凯. 不同酶处理对低次烟叶提取物提质效果的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(3): 170-180.
[6]	张四普, 崔巍, 张柯, 鲁云风, 苗建银, 郭超峰, 解远明, 张艳敏, 牛佳佳. 11 种不同品种梨膏的综合品质评价[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(12): 167-180.
[7]	史大坤, 李方杰, 卫晓轶, 洪德峰, 刘经纬, 王稼苜, 张雪海, 魏锋. 150 份玉米自交系茎秆性状及抗倒能力综合评价[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(10): 51-59.
[8]	杨克方, 李瑞荣, 金梦真, 吴灵梅, 周季欣, 张亚玉. 基于最小数据集的川泽泻土壤肥力评价[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(1): 76-89.
[9]	张爱琴, 郭斌, 柳利龙, 李旭华, 王青, 徐瑞, 张环. 基于主成分分析和隶属函数法的谷子营养品质综合评价[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(1): 28-39.
[10]	苗明军, 李佳佳, 雷晓葵, 林杨, 廖继超, 钟建, 李菊, 李跃建, 常伟. 32 个菠菜品种对镉胁迫的生长响应及耐镉性评价[J]. 河南农业科学, 2024, 53(9): 108-116.
[11]	张博, 王新惠, 孔波, 王志国, 李瑞丽, 梁淼, 张峻松. 白肋烟醇溶性提取物不同孔径膜分离产物分析及卷烟加香评价[J]. 河南农业科学, 2024, 53(8): 165-172.
[12]	赵志磊, 孙鸣, 刘冬冬, 邱政芳, 庞艳苹. 电子束辐照对柴胡中21 种禁用农药残留降解率及柴胡有效成分的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2024, 53(7): 117-123.
[13]	刘志勇, 罗富方, 鲁万华, 朱波, 李洪勋, 刘章勇, 陈杰, 易丽霞. 基于最小数据集的黔西南州烟田土壤质量评价[J]. 河南农业科学, 2024, 53(7): 100-108.
[14]	张会芳, 燕照玲, 刘海礁, 段俊枝, 陈海燕, 郭燕, 王楠, 杨翠苹, 齐红志. 河南省联合体试验小麦品种综合性状分析与评价[J]. 河南农业科学, 2024, 53(7): 35-43.
[15]	王鹏伟, 闫晓文, 刘珍宇, 孙丽, 刘振威, 李新峥. 百蜜系列南瓜品种（系）采后品质变化和耐贮性比较[J]. 河南农业科学, 2024, 53(3): 158-168.

不同类型烟叶干馏香料制备及在加热卷烟中的应用

Preparation of Different Types of Tobacco Leaf Dry Distilled Flavor and Application in Heated Cigarettes

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics