河南农业科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (12): 190-197.DOI: 10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2021.12.022

• 农业信息与工程·农产品加工 • 上一篇    下一篇

《河南农业科学》近10 a 学术影响力分析

卓文飞,燕照玲   

  1. (河南省农业科学院农业经济与信息研究所,河南 郑州 450002)
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-20 出版日期:2021-12-15 发布日期:2022-01-28
  • 作者简介:卓文飞(1968-),女,河南郑州人,副研究员,博士,主要从事期刊编辑及农业科技信息研究。E-mail:kjcankao@126.com。燕照玲为同等贡献作者
  • 基金资助:
    河南省农业科学院自主创新基金项目(2019ZC48)

Academic Influence Analysis of Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences in Last Decade

ZHUO Wenfei,YAN Zhaoling   

  1. (Institute of Agricultural Economy and Information,Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Zhengzhou 450002,China)
  • Received:2021-11-20 Published:2021-12-15 Online:2022-01-28

摘要: 《河南农业科学》是由河南省农业科学院主办的综合性农业科技期刊,在传播农业科技创新研究成果、促进科技成果转化、培养农业科技人才方面发挥了重要作用。学术影响力反映期刊发展的成就,为了解近10 a《河南农业科学》的学术影响力发展动态,采用中国科技信息研究所发布的《中国科技期刊引证报告(核心版)》数据,对《河南农业科学》近10 a主要被引用指标和来源指标的年度变化进行分析,并与19种其他省级农业科学院主办的同类期刊进行对比。结果表明,总被引频次、平均作者数、平均引文数均逐年增加,2011年后他引率明显提高,自2014年起影响因子、即年指标、权威因子、被引半衰期均逐年提升或者升到一定值后保持稳定;来源文献量、AR论文量均逐年降低,而AR论文比例则逐年增加;同时,存在基金论文比较低、引用半衰期较长、被引半衰期较短等问题。与19种其他省级农业科学院主办的同类期刊进行对比,《河南农业科学》的综合评价总分排在第8位,总被引频次、影响因子、平均引文数分别排在第7、4、6位,而他引率、开放因子、基金论文比排名较靠后。综上,《河南农业科学》在最近10 a的办刊过程中,学术质量逐渐提高,但也存在对学科热点关注不够、对基金项目重视不足等问题,今后需加强相关约稿和同行评议,发表更多高水平的创新性学术论文,全面提高期刊出版质量,提升《河南农业科学》学术影响力。

关键词: 《河南农业科学》, 期刊评价指标, 学术影响力, 文献计量

Abstract: Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences is a comprehensive agricultural science and technology journal sponsored by Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences.It has played an important role in displaying and disseminating agricultural scientific and technological innovation achievements,promoting the transformation of scientific and technological achievements,and cultivating agricultural scientific and technological talents.Academic influence reflects the achievements of journal development.In order to understand the changes in the academic influence of Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences in last decade,the evaluation data of the Chinese Science and Technology Journal Citation Report(Core Version)were used to analyze the annual changes of the main cited indicators and source indicators from 2010 to 2019.The values of partial evaluation indicators were compared with other 19 similar journals sponsored by provincial academies of agricultural sciences.The results showed that the total cited frequency,average author number and average citation number increased year by year. After 2011,the other‐citing rate increased obviously. After 2014,the impact factor,mmediate index,authority factor,and cited half‐life increased year by year or reached a certain value and remained stable,the source literature number and AR paper number decreased year by year,while the AR paper ratio showed the opposite. Meanwhile,there were deficiencies such as relatively lower funded paper ratio,longer citing half‐life,and shorter cited half‐life.Compared with other 19 similar journals,the comprehensive evaluation score of Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences ranked 8th,the total cited frequency,impact factor,and average citation number ranked 7th,4th,and 6th respectively,but the other‐citing rate,opening factor,and funded paper ratio ranked lower.In summary,the academic quality of Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences has gradually improved in last decade,but there are also problems including insufficient attention to subject hot topics and funded projects. In the future,it is necessary to strengthen relevant manuscripts and peer review,publish more high‐level innovative academic papers,comprehensively improve the quality of journal publication,and enhance the academic influence of Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences.

Key words: Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, Journal evaluation indicators, Academic influence, Bibliometrics

中图分类号: