高温纤维素降解菌群PN-8 对小麦秸秆的降解能力及影响因素研究

doi:10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2022.04.009

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了明确高温纤维素降解菌群PN-8的性质及关键影响因素，分析了不同化学前处理（0.5%、1.5%、10.0%的氢氧化钠，3.0%、12.0%、18.0%的盐酸，2.0%、20.0%的乙酸）及培养基中初始接种量、葡萄糖含量、pH值对PN-8降解小麦秸秆的影响，通过气质联机检测、纤维素酶活性测定及扫描电子显微镜观察等分析了PN-8降解小麦秸秆过程主要产物、不同纤维素酶活性及小麦秸秆降解特点。结果表明，小麦秸秆前处理影响PN-8的降解能力，碱（氢氧化钠）处理可以降低木质素含量从而提高PN-8的降解率，而酸（盐酸、乙酸）处理会提高木质素含量从而降低PN-8的降解率。其中，小麦秸秆经过1.5%、10.0%的氢氧化钠处理后降解率分别为71.61%、87.33%，显著高于未经化学前处理的44.33%。当初始PN-8的接种量在5.0%以下时，滤纸条分解速度和接种量呈正相关，接种量高于5.0%后其对小麦秸秆的降解率差异不显著；初始葡萄糖含量高于0.1%，或者初始pH值超出5~9时，PN-8失去对小麦秸秆的分解能力。PN-8发酵过程中甘油的质量浓度最高，发酵第1 天质量浓度最高可达0.28 g/L，其次为乙酸和乙醇；PN-8降解小麦秸秆过程中羧甲基纤维素酶活性和滤纸酶活性均呈现先上升后下降的变化规律；电镜扫描结果显示，PN-8可以破坏小麦秸秆结构，分解木质纤维素。

关键词: 纤维素降解菌群, 纤维素酶活性, 酸处理, 碱处理, 纤维素降解率, 小麦秸秆

Abstract: In order to clarify the characteristics and key influencing factors of thermophilic lignocellulose‑degradation microbial community PN‑8，we analyzed the effects of different chemical pretreatments（0.5%，1.5%，10.0% sodium hydroxide，3.0%，12.0%，18.0% hydrochloric acid，2.0%，20.0% acetic acid），initial inoculation amount，glucose content and pH on the degradation of wheat straw by PN‑8.The main products of PN‑8 in the process of degrading wheat straw were analyzed by GC‑MSQP2010，and the degradation ability of PN‑8 on wheat straw was detected by scanning electron microscope.The results showed that chemical pretreatment of wheat straw affected the degradation ability of PN‑8.Alkali treatment（sodium hydroxide）could reduce lignin content and improve the degradation rate of PN‑8，while acid treatment（hydrochloric acid，acetic acid）could increase lignin content and reduce the degradation rate. Among them，after 1.5%，10.0% sodium hydroxide treatment，the degradation rate of wheat straw reached 71.61%，87.33% respectively，which were significantly higher than that without chemical pretreatment（44.33%）.When the initial inoculation amount of PN‑8 was less than 5.0%，the degradation rate was positively correlated with the inoculation amount，and there was no significantly difference when the inoculation amount was higher than 5.0%.When the initial glucose concentration was higher than 0.1%，or the initial pH value exceeded the range of 5—9，PN‑8 lost the degradation ability of wheat straw.Glycerol was the dominant fermentation product，which could reach the maximum content of 0.28 g/L on the first day of fermentation，followed by acetic acid and ethanol.Both carboxymethyl cellulase activity and filter paper enzyme activity showed a change regular of first increasing and then decreasing during the fermentation process.The results of scanning electron microscope showed that PN‑8 could destroy the structure of wheat straw and degrade lignocellulose.

Key words: Cellulose?degradation microbial community, Cellulase activity, Acid treatment, Alkali treatment, Cellulose degradation rate, Wheat straw

中图分类号:

S141.4
X71

武凤霞, 孙悦, 肖强, 张淑彬, 李钰飞, 刘建斌. 高温纤维素降解菌群PN-8 对小麦秸秆的降解能力及影响因素研究[J]. 河南农业科学, 2022, 51(4): 77-86.

WU Fengxia, SUN Yue, XIAO Qiang, ZHANG Shubin, LI Yufei, LIU Jianbin. Degradation Ability and Influencing Factors of Cellulose‑degradation Microbial Community PN‑8 on Wheat Straw[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 51(4): 77-86.

图/表 9

参考文献

［1］ZHANG S，XIA T，WANG J，et al.Role of Bacillus inoculation in rice straw composting and bacterial community stability after inoculation：Unite resistance or individual collapse［J］.Bioresource Technology，2021，337：125464.
［2］石祖梁，王飞，王久臣，等.我国农作物秸秆资源利用特征、技术模式及发展建议［J］.中国农业科技导报，2019，21（5）：8‑16.
SHI Z L，WANG F，WANG J C，et al.Utilization characteristics， technical model and development suggestion on crop straw in China［J］.Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology，2019，21（5）：8‑16.
［3］张晓庆，王梓凡，参木友，等.中国农作物秸秆产量及综合利用现状分析［J］.中国农业大学学报，2021，26（9）：30‑41.
ZHANG X Q，WANG Z F，CAN M Y，et al.Analysis of yield and current comprehensive utilization of crop straws
in China［J］.Journal of China Agricultural University，2021，26（9）：30‑41.
［4］CHEN X M，CHENG W T，LI S Z，et al.The“quality”and “quantity” of microbial species drive thedegradation of cellulose during composting ［J］.Bioresource Technology，2021，320：124425.
［5］HARRISO B P，CHOPRA E，RYALS R，et al.Quantifying the farmland application of compost to help meet California’s organic waste diversion law［J］.Environmental Science and Technology，2020，54（7）：4545‑4553.
［6］刘建斌，武凤霞，张淑彬，等.高温纤维素分解菌群PN-8的筛选及微生物组成研究［J］.中国农学通报，2017，33（35）：50‑56.
LIU J B，WU F X，ZHANG S B，et al.Screening and microbial component of a thermophilic，cellulosedegradation
bacterial community PN‑8［J］.Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin，2017，33（35）：50‑56.
［7］ZHANG X，LI S，CHENG W，et al.Oxytetracycline stress reconstruct the core microbial community related to
nitrogen transformation during composting ［J］.Bioresource Technolog，2021，319：124142.
［8］CHEN M，XU P，ZENG G，et al.Bioremediation of soils contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons，
petroleum，pesticides，chlorophenols and heavy metals by composting：Applications，microbes and future research needs［J］. Biotechnology Advances，2015，33（6）：745‑755.
［9］LU L，ZENG G，FAN C，et al.Characterization of a laccase‑like multicopper oxidase from newly isolated Streptomyces sp.C1 in agricultural waste compost and enzymatic decolorization of azo dyes［J］.Biochemical
Engineering Journal，2013，72：70‑76.
［10］李国学，张福锁. 固体废物堆肥化与有机复混肥生产［M］.北京：化学工业出版社，2000：75‑98.
LI G X，ZHANG F X. Solid waste composting and organic compound fertilizer production［M］.Beijing：Chemical Industry Press，2000：75‑98.
［11］TUOMELA M，VIKMAN M，HATAKKA A，et al.Biodegradation of lignin in a compost environment：Areview［J］.Bioresource Technology，2000，72（2）：169‑183.
［12］ZHU N，ZHU Y，LI B，et al.Increase enzyme activities and fungal degraders by Gloeophyllum trabeum inoculation improve lignocellulose degradation efficiency during manure‑straw composting［J］.Bioresource Technology，2021，337：125427.
［13］AWASTHI M K，PANDEY A K，KHAN J，et al.Evaluation of thermophilic fungal consortium for organic municipal solid waste composting ［J］.Bioresource Technology，2014，168：214‑221.
［14］AWASTHI S K，WONG J W，LI J，et al.Evaluation of microbial dynamics during post‑consumption food waste composting［J］.Bioresource Technology，2018，251：181‑188.
［15］ARANTES V，JELLISON J，GOODELL B，et al.Peculiarities of brown‑rot fungi and biochemical fenton reaction with regard to their potential as a model for bioprocessing biomass［J］.Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology，2012，94（2）：323‑338.
［16］DUAN M，ZHANG Y，ZHOU Y，et al.Effects of Bacillus subtilis on carbon components and microbial functional metabolism during cow manure‑straw composting［J］.Bioresource Technology，2020，303：122868.
［17］YIN Y，GU J，WANG X，et al.Effects of rhamnolipid and Tween‑80 on cellulase activities and metabolic functions of the bacterial community during chicken manure composting［J］.Bioresource Technology，2019，288：121507.
［18］高星爱，李莉，赵新颖，等.纤维素分解微生物复合菌剂降解固态物料特性研究［J］.东北农业大学学报，2014，45（12）：71‑76.
GAO X A，LI L，ZHAO X Y，et al.Characteristics study in the solid material decomposing by cellulose producing microbial compound inoculants［J］.Journal of Northeast Agricultural University，2014，45（12）：71‑76.
［19］崔宗均，李美丹，朴哲，等.一组高效稳定纤维素分解菌复合系MC1的筛选及功能［J］.环境科学，2002，23（3）：36‑39.
CUI Z J，LI M D，PIAO Z，et al.Selection of a compositemicrobial system MC1 with efficient and stability
cellulose degradation bacteria and its function［J］.Environmental Science，2002，23（3）：36‑39.
［20］王伟东，王小芬，刘长莉，等.木质纤维素分解菌复合系WSC-6分解稻秆过程中的产物及pH动态［J］，环境科学，2008，29（1）：219‑224.
WANG W D，WANG X F，LIU C L，et al. Productions analyses and pH dynamics during rice straw degradation
by the lignocellulose degradation bacteria system WSC‑6［J］.Environmental Science，2008，29（1）：219‑224.
［21］牛俊玲，崔宗均，李国学，等. 高效纤维素分解菌复合系的筛选构建及其对秸秆的分解特性［J］.农业环境科学学报，2005，24（4）：795‑799.
NIU J L，CUI Z J，LI G X，et al.Selection and construction of composting consortia for degrading lignocellulose efficiently and its capability of straw degradation［J］.Journal of Agro‑environment Science，2005，24（4）：795‑799.
［22］PAPA G，RODRIGUEZ S，GEORGE A，et al.Comparison of different pretreatments for the production of bioethanol and biomethane from corn stover and switchgrass［J］.Bioresource Technology，2015，183：101‑110.
［23］史旭洋，钱程，刘艳，等.不同方法预处理的玉米秸秆结构与酶解分析［J］.分析化学，2018（9）：1501‑1506.
SHI X Y，QIAN C，LIU Y，et al.Structure and enzymatic hydrolysis analysis of corn stover prethreated with
different pretreatment methods［J］.Chinese Journal Analytical Chemistry，2018（9）：1501‑1506.
［24］KATO S，HARUTA S，CUI Z J，et al.Effective cellulose degradation by a mixed‑culture system composed of a
cellulolytic Clostridium and aerobic non‑cellulolytic bacteria［J］.FEMS Microbiology Ecology，2004，51：133‑142.
［25］KATO S，HARUTA S，CUI Z J，et al.Stable coexistence of five bacterial strains as a cellulose‑degrading community［J］.Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology，2005，71：7099‑7106.
［26］张育铭，孙卓楠，王勇，等.黑曲霉DR12菌株固体产酶发酵条件优化及菌剂制备［J］.山西农业科学，2021，49（3）：285‑288.
ZHANG Y M，SUN Z N，WANG Y，et al.Optimization of solid‑state fermentation condition of Aspergillus niger
DR12 strain with producing cellulase and preparation of agents［J］.Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences，2021，49（3）：285‑288.
［27］邵帅，王玲玲，林剑，等.产纤维素酶真菌分离及高效菌株筛选［J］.河南农业科学，2020，49（4）：55‑61.
SHAO S，WANG L L，LIN J，et al.Isolation of cellulase‑producing fungi and screening of highly efficient strains［J］.Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences，2020，49（4）：55‑61.
［28］LI C，LI H，YAO T，et al.Effects of microbial inoculation on enzyme activity，available nitrogen content，and bacterial succession during pig manure composting［J］.Bioresource Technology，2020，306：123167.
［29］WET Y，WU D，WEI D，et al.Improved lignocellulose‑degrading performance during straw composting from diverse sources with actinomycetes inoculation by regulating the key enzyme activities［J］.Bioresource Technology，2019，271：66‑74.

[1]	李杨, 康俊港, 马占飞, 王亚博, 赵博伟, 姜国均. 中药渣饲喂对蚯蚓生长性能及消化酶活性的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2023, 52(5): 156-161.
[2]	刘单卿，李顺义，郭夏丽. 不同还田方式下小麦秸秆的腐解特征及养分释放规律[J]. 河南农业科学, 2018, 47(4): 49-53.
[3]	白献晓，王二柱，朱群，常娟，尹清强，刘超齐，卢富山. 碱和蒸汽高压对小麦秸秆中粗纤维降解率的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2016, 45(11): 135-138.
[4]	周锦业，丁国昌，卜朝阳，曹光球，卢家仕，林思祖. 不同处理方式对银叶金合欢种子发芽的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2015, 44(5): 121-124.
[5]	赵前程;李松;郭冠男;王晓兰;关洪斌. 柠檬酸对锰胁迫下大豆幼苗生长特性的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2010, 39(12): 29-35 .
[6]	杨首乐. 潮土中小麦秸秆腐解残留率测定方法比较[J]. 河南农业科学, 2005, 34(12): 61-63.
[7]	焦进良;胡正祥. 提高农作物秸秆饲用价值的方法[J]. 河南农业科学, 2003, 32(4): 50-50.