Effect of Different Preservative Bags on Postharvest Storage Quality of Mini⁃Tuber Seed Potatoes from Aeroponic System

doi:10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2024.04.017

Abstract

Abstract: In order to clarify the effect of different preservative bags on postharvest storage quality of mini⁃tuber seed potatoes from aeroponic system,‘Atlantic’mini⁃tuber seed potatoes were used as materials，the storage and preservation effects of four types of preservation bags on the mini⁃tuber seed potatoes were investigated by measuring the weight loss rate,germination rate,decay rate,and related physiological indicators of the seed tubers during storage.The results showed that at(20±1)℃,compared with ordinary mesh bags(CK),four types of preservation bags,including ordinary A⁃film bags,nano preservation bags,walnut preservation bags,and garlic sprout preservation bags,could effectively improve the storage and preservation effect of mini⁃tuber seed potatoes.Among them,walnut preservation bags and nano preservation bags had the best storage and preservation effect on mini⁃tuber seed potatoes.Using these two types of preservation bags for package could significantly reduce the weight loss rate of mini⁃tuber seed potatoes,and mini⁃tuber seed potatoes packaged in nano preservation bags had the lowest decay rate,after 84 days of storage,the weight loss rates of mini⁃tuber seed potatoes packaged in walnut preservation bags and nano preservation bags were reduced by 73.20% and 63.62% compared with CK，respectively.The decay rate of mini⁃tuber seed potatoes packaged in walnut preservation bags increased by 21.43% compared with CK,while the decay rate of mini⁃tuber seed potatoes packaged in nano preservation bags decreased by 31.25% compared with CK.They could inhibit the rising speed of relative conductivity and malondialdehyde(MDA)content,and reduce the damage of cell membrane,after 70 days of storage,the MDA contents of mini⁃tuber seed potatoes packaged in walnut preservation bags and nano preservation bags were reduced by 23.26% and 13.95% compared with CK,respectively.At the same time,they could also promote the activities of peroxidase(POD),catalase(CAT) and superoxide dismutase(SOD),reduce the damage of oxygen free radicals,and make potatoes germinate normally,so they had a good storage and fresh⁃keeping effect on aeroponic cultured micro seed potatoes.By comprehensive consideration,it is recommended to use nano preservation bags for package during the
storage of mini⁃tuber seed potatoes from aeroponic system.

Key words: Mini?tuber seed potato, Aeroponic, Storage bag, Antioxidant enzymes, Storage and preservation

摘要： 为了明确不同保鲜袋包装对雾培马铃薯微型种薯贮藏保鲜效果的影响，以大西洋雾培微型种薯为试材，通过测定种薯块茎贮藏期间的失重率、发芽率和腐烂率及其相关生理指标等，探究4种保鲜袋对微型种薯的贮藏保鲜效果。结果表明，在（20±1）℃下，与普通网袋（CK）相比，普通A膜袋、纳米保鲜袋、核桃保鲜袋、蒜薹保鲜袋等4种保鲜袋均能有效改善微型种薯的贮藏保鲜效果，其中以核桃保鲜袋和纳米保鲜袋对微型种薯的贮藏保鲜效果较佳。这2种保鲜袋包装均能够明显降低微型种薯的失重率，且以纳米保鲜袋包装微型种薯的腐烂率最低，贮藏84 d，核桃保鲜袋和纳米保鲜袋包装微型种薯的失重率分别较CK降低73.20%、63.62%，核桃保鲜袋包装微型种薯的腐烂率较CK升高21.43%，纳米保鲜袋包装微型种薯的腐烂率较CK降低31.25%；抑制相对电导率和丙二醛（MDA）含量的上升速度，减少细胞膜的受损程度，贮藏70 d，核桃保鲜袋和纳米保鲜袋包装微型种薯的MDA 含量分别较CK 降低23.26%、13.95%；同时，还可促进过氧化物酶（POD）、过氧化氢酶（CAT）及超氧化物歧化酶（SOD）活性的提高，减少氧自由基的伤害，并能够正常发芽，对雾培微型种薯具有良好的贮藏保鲜效果。综合考虑，建议在雾培微型种薯贮藏期间采用纳米保鲜袋包装

关键词: 马铃薯微型种薯, 雾培法, 保鲜袋, 抗氧化酶, 贮藏保鲜

CLC Number:

S532

LI Shouqiang, TIAN Jiachun, GE Xia, LI Mei, CHENG Jianxin, LI Yumei, TIAN Shilong. Effect of Different Preservative Bags on Postharvest Storage Quality of Mini⁃Tuber Seed Potatoes from Aeroponic System[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 53(4): 152-160.

李守强, 田甲春, 葛霞, 李梅, 程建新, 李玉梅, 田世龙. 不同保鲜袋包装对雾培马铃薯微型种薯贮藏保鲜效果的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2024, 53(4): 152-160.

References

［1］程建新，葛霞，田世龙，等.香芹酮结合吨袋内循环施药模式对马铃薯贮藏效果及油炸薯片色泽的影响［J］.河南农业科学，2022，51（6）：164⁃171.
CHENG J X，GE X，TIAN S L et al.Influence of carvone with ton bag⁃inner circulating application mode on potato storage effect and color of fried potato chips［J］.Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences，2022，51（6）：164⁃171.

［2］崔永伟，杜聪慧，李树君.中国马铃薯种薯产业发展分析与展望［J］.农业展望，2020（1）：71⁃76.

CUI Y W，DU C H，LI S J.Analysis and prospect on China’ s seed potato industrial development［J］.Agricultural Outlook，2020（1）：71⁃76.

［3］荐红举，张梅花，尚丽娜，等.利用WGCNA 筛选马铃薯块茎发育候选基因［J］.作物学报，2022，48（7）：1658⁃1668.

JIAN H J，ZHANG M H，SHANG L N，et al.Screening candidate genes involved in potato tuber development using WGCNA［J］.Acta Agronomica Sinica，2022，48（7）：1658⁃1668.

［4］张丹妮，刘艳军，李建科，等.马铃薯松散型愈伤组织再生体系的建立［J］.天津农业科学，2018，24（8）：70⁃73.

ZHANG D N，LIU Y J，LI J K，et al. Study on the regeneration technology of potato loose callus in viro［J］.Tianjin Agricultural Sciences，2018，24（8）：70⁃73.

［5］张德银，廖霏霏，刘兴贵，等.脱毒马铃薯雾化生产研究进展［J］.现代农业科技，2018（20）：60⁃61，63.

ZHANG D Y，LIAO F F，LIU X G，et al.Research progress on atomization production of virus⁃free potato［J］.Modern Agricultural Science and Technology，2018（20）：60⁃61，63.

［6］刘悦善.浅析微型种薯“雾培法”生产技术对甘肃省马铃薯种薯产业发展的影响［J］.种子科技，2019，37 （16）：121⁃122.

LIU Y S. Analysis on the influence of the original seed“fog culture”production technology on the development of potato seed potato industry in Gansu Province［J］.Seed Science & Technology，2019，37（16）：121⁃122.

［7］李文刚，梁东超，杜保社，等.马铃薯脱毒微型种薯生产及其繁育推广体系：铃田模式［J］.中国马铃薯，2002 （2）：92⁃94.

LI W G，JIA D D，ZHUANG Z，et al. Production and breeding promotion system of virus⁃free mini potato seed potatoes：Boll field model［J］. Chinese Potato Journal ，2002（2）：92⁃94.

［8］于洋洋，贾代东，庄正，等植物气雾栽培研究进展［J］江苏农业科学，2019，47（18）：38⁃42.

YU Y Y，JIA D D，ZHUANG Z，et al.Research progress on aeroponics for plants ［J］.Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences，2019，47（18）：38⁃42.

［9］万婷丽，贺晓霞.雾培马铃薯不同品种微型薯贮藏期生理特性变化［J］.现代农业科技，2017（23）：37，41.

WAN T L， HE X X.Changes of physiological characteristics of different varieties of microtubers during storage period of aeroponic potato［J］.Modern Agricultural Science and Technology，2017（23）：37，41.

［10］蒲育林，王蒂，王瑞斌.不同贮藏条件对马铃薯微型种薯活力及生理特性的影响［J］.西北植物学报，2008 ，28（2）：336⁃341.

PU Y L，WANG D，WANG R B.Vigor andphysiological characters of potato minitubers under different storage conditions［J］.Acta Botanica Boreali⁃Occidentalia Sinica，2008，28（2）：336⁃341.

［11］ZINASH A B，OLUWAFEMI J C，UMEZURUIKE L O.Modelling approaches for designing and evaluating the performance of modified atmosphere packaging（MAP）systems for fresh produce：A review［J］.Food Packaging and Shelf Life，2016，10：1⁃15.

［12］向延菊，王大伟，李小华.薄膜袋包装对新疆阿拉尔地区圆脆枣贮藏特性的影响［J］.食品研究与开发，2016，37（2）：191⁃194.

XIANG Y J，WANG D W，LI X H. Influence of plastic packaging film bags on quality of‘Yuancui’jujube fruit in alar in Xinjiang during storage［J］.Food Research and Development，2016，37（2）：191⁃194.

［13］史君彦，徐冬颖，郑秋丽，等.不同保鲜袋包装对菠菜采后保鲜效果的影响［J］.食品研究与开发，2018，39 （11）：175⁃179.

SHI J Y，XU D Y，ZHENG Q L，et al.Effect of different preservative bags on postharvest storage quality of spinach［J］.Food Research and Development，2018，39（11）：175⁃179.

［14］黄海雄，黄育强.新型果蔬保鲜膜包装对砂糖橘贮藏效果的研究［J］.保鲜与加工，2016，16（1）：21⁃26.

HUANG H X，HUANG Y Q.Preservation effect of new type fruit and vegetable film packages on shatangju fruit［J］.Storage and Process，2016，16（1）：21⁃26.

［15］陈柏，颉敏华，吴小华，等.4种包装材料对低温贮藏期间去青皮核桃感官品质的影响［J］.甘肃农业科技，2018（12）：19⁃23.

CHEN B，XIE M H，WU X H，et al.Effects of different packaging materials on sensory quality of peeled green walnut fruit during cold storage［J］.Gansu Agricultural Science and Technology，2018（12）：19⁃23.

［16］曹建康，姜微波，赵玉梅. 果蔬采后生理生化实验指导［M］.北京：中国轻工业出版社，2007.

CAO J K，JIANG W B，ZHAO Y M.Instruction of fruit and vegetable postharvest physiological and biochemical experiments［M］.Beijing：China Light Industry Press，2007.

［17］高俊凤.植物生理学实验指导［M］.北京：高等教育出版社，2006.

GAO J F.Guidance for plant physiology experiments［M］.Beijing：Higher Education Press，2006．

［18］AFIFY A，EL⁃BELTAGI H，ALY A，EL⁃ANSARY A.Antioxidant enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation as biomarker compounds for potato tuber stored by gamma radiation［J］.Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine，2012，12：1548⁃1555.

［19］何献君，吕光璞，陈雅惠.过氧化物酶酶促动力学实验的设计［J］.实验技术与管理，2009，26（6）：33⁃35.

HE X J，LÜ G P，CHEN Y H.Design for dynamics experiment of peroxidase［J］.Experimental Technology and Management，2009，26（6）：33⁃35.

［20］李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术［M］北京：高等教育出版社，2001．

LI H S.Principles and techniques of plant
physiological and biochemical experiments［M].Beijing：Higher Education Press，2001．

［21］张文明，郑文寅，姚大年，等.草坪草种子活力测定方法的比较研究［J］.草原与草坪，2004（3）：48⁃51．

ZHANG W M，ZHENG W Y，YAO D N，et al.Comparative study on methods for testing seed vigor of turfgrass［J］.Grassland and Turf，2004（3）：48⁃51.

［22］汤菊香，李明军，李广领.甲醇老化处理对小麦种子生理特性影响的研究［J］.河南师范大学学报（自然科学版），2005，33（3）：164⁃166．
TANG J X，LI M J，LI G L.Studies on the physiological characteristic of wheat in their artifical aging［J].Journal of Henan Normal University（Natural Science Edition），2005，33（3）：164⁃166．
［23］普红梅，李雪瑞，杨芳，等.不同采后处理对云南油桃和水蜜桃的贮藏保鲜效果对比［J］.现代食品科技，2020，36（3）：120⁃126.
PU H M，LI X R，YANG F，et al.Comparison of fresh⁃keeping effects of different post⁃harvest treatments on yunnan nectarine and honey peach［J］.Modern Food Science and Technology，2020，36（3）：120⁃126.

［24］张桂霞，王英超，王瑞.柿果软化过程中丙二醛含量变化的研究［J］.天津农学院学报，2007（2）：27⁃29．
ZHANG G X，WANG Y C，WANG R.Study on MDA content during softening process of persimmon fruit［J］.Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University，2007 （2）：27⁃29．
［25］GOEL A，GOEL A K，SHEORAN I S.Change in oxidative stress enzymes during artificial ageing in cotton（Gossypium hirsutum L.）seeds［J］.Journal of Plant Physiology，2003，160：1093⁃1100.

［26］SUNG J M，CHIU C C.Lipid peroxidation and peroxide⁃scav⁃enging enzymes of naturally aged soybean seed［J］.Plant Science，1995，110：45⁃52.

［27］郭艳萍，马慧玲，王贵禧，等.乙烯对桃果实MA 贮藏期和货架期品质及有关生理机制的影响［J］.西北农林科技大学学报（自然科学版），2009，37（3）：119⁃126.
GUO Y P，MA H L，WANG G X，et al.Effect of the ethylene on the peach fruit quality and relative physiological mechanism during the MA storage and shelf life［J］.Journal of Northwest A & F University（Natural Science Edition），2009，37（3）：119⁃126.

［28］南芝润，范月仙.植物过氧化氢酶的研究进展［J］.安徽农学通报，2008（5）：27⁃29.
NAN Z R，FAN Y X.Advance of researches on catalase plants ［J］.Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin，2008（5）：27⁃29.

［29］WEI M L，GE Y H，LI C Y，et al.G6PDH regulated NADPH production and reactive oxygen species metabolism to enhance disease resistance against blue mold in apple fruit by acibenzolar⁃S⁃methyl［J］.Postharvest Biology and Technology，2019，148：228⁃235.

［30］IMAHORI Y，BAI J，BALDWIN E.Antioxidative responses of ripe tomato fruit to postharvest chilling and heating treatments［J］.Scientia Horticulturae，2016，198：398⁃406.

［31］FATH A，BETHKE P C，JONES R L.Enzymes that scavenge reactive oxygen species are down⁃regulated prior to gibberellic acid⁃induced programmed cell death in barley aleurone［J］.Plant Physiology，2001，126（1）：156⁃166.

［32］JIANG M，ZHANG J. Effect of abscisic acid on active oxygen species，antioxidative defence system and oxidative damage in leaves of maize seedlings［J］.Plant and Cell Physiology，2001，42（11）：1265⁃1273.

［33］JOO J H，BAE Y S，LEE J S.Role of auxin⁃induced reactive oxygen species in root gravitropism［J］.Plant Physiology，2001，126（3）：1055⁃1060.

［34］丁薪源，曹建康. 果蔬过氧化物酶酶学特性研究进展［J］.食品科技，2012，37（10）：62⁃66.
DING X Y，CAO J K. Characteristics of peroxidase from fruit and vegetable research progress［J］.Food Science and Technology，2012，37（10）：62⁃66.

［35］薛鑫，张芊，吴金霞.植物体内活性氧的研究及其在植物抗逆方面的应用［J］.生物技术通报，2013（10）：7⁃10．
XUE X，ZHANG Q，WU J X.Research of reactive oxygen species in plants and its application on stress tolerance［J］.Biotechnology Bulletin，2013（10）：7⁃10．
［36］WANG Q G，CAO Y，ZHOU L L，et al.Effects of postharvest curing treatment on flesh colour and phenolic metabolism in flesh cut potato products［J］.Food Chemistry，2015，169：246⁃254.

［37］巫梅婷，王玲，刘海，等.不同自发气调包装袋对菜心薹茎木质化的影响［J］.南方农业学报，2023，54（10）：3010⁃3019.
WU M T，WANG L，LIU H，et al.Effects of different spontaneous modified atmosphere packaging bags on lignification of bolting stem of Chinese flowering cabbage［J］.Journal of Southern Agriculture，2023，54 （10）：3010⁃3019.

［38］熊子璇，吴志蒙，黄华，等.不同保鲜袋包装对采后油桃果实贮藏品质的影响［J］.包装工程，2022，43（3）：78⁃86.
XIONG Z X，WU Z M，HUANG H，et al.Effects of different packaging films on quality of postharvest ambient storage in nectarine fruits［J］.Packaging Engineering，2022，43（3）：78⁃86.

［39］齐淑宁，赵垚垚，唐继兴，等.不同保鲜袋包装对水蜜桃贮藏品质的影响［J］.包装工程，2022，42（19）：55⁃62.
QI S N，ZHAO Y Y，TANG J X，et al.Effect of different fresh⁃keeping bags on storage quality of juicy reach［J］.Packaging Engineering，2022，42（19）：55⁃62.

［40］满杰，韦强，钱井，等.不同气调保鲜袋对番茄采后保鲜效果的影响［J］.蔬菜，2022（6）：42⁃47.
MAN J，WEI Q，QIANG J，et al.Effects of different preservative bags on postharvest storage quality of tomato［J］.Vegetables，2022（6）：42⁃47.

［41］李兰红，李佩然，李鹏，等.保鲜袋窖贮模式对北方大白菜保鲜效果的影响［J］.现代食品，2021，35（8）：112⁃115.
LI L H，LI P R，LI P，et al.Effect of fresh⁃keeping bag and cellar storage mode on preservation effects of northern chinese cabbage［J］.Modern Food，2021，35 （8）：112⁃115.

[1]	ZHANG Fan, LI Yuan, CHEN Mengru, XING Yingying, WANG Xiukang. Comparison and Comprehensive Evaluation of Quality of 20 Potato Varieties [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 51(8): 28-36.
[2]	CHENG Jianxin, GE Xia, TIAN Shilong, LI Shouqiang, TIAN Jiachun, LI Mei. Influence of Carvone with Ton Bag⁃Inner Circulating Application Mode on Potato Storage Effect and Color of Fried Potato Chips [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 51(6): 164-171.
[3]	GUO Tao, XING Yingying, JIANG Wenting, LI Zhuoyuan, ZHANG Teng, MI Feiyao, WANG Xiukang. Effects of Drip Irrigation and Fertilization on Root LayerSoil Nutrient Content，Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Potato [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 50(9): 16-25.
[4]	CUI Baowei. Effect of Application of Soil Conditioner and Organic Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Potatoes in Yellow-Tide Soil Region of Eastern Henan [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 49(12): 47-53.
[5]	XIE Zhao, FU Tianling, HE Tengbing, CHENG Jianbo, FU Dongshun, LUO Sheng. Effects of Cd Stress on Bacterial Community Composition and Diversity in Potato Rhizosphere Soil [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 49(6): 48-58.
[6]	LIU Shuancheng. Effects of Organic Fertilizer Combined with Inorganic Fertilizer on Growth,Yield and Quality of Potato [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 49(3): 32-39.
[7]	CUI Liang, KRISTIINA Laanemets, LIU Guanqiu, TERJE Tähtjärv, MATI Koppel, ZHOU Huanan, PAN Jiaquan, WAN Bo, MENG Lingwen. Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Rate on Dry Matter Accumulation Characteristic and Yield of Potato [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 49(2): 44-51.
[8]	LI Menglu, CHEN Yanyun, XIA Wanyu. Effects of Different Fertilizer Ratio on Potato Quality and Yield [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 49(1): 44-51.
[9]	. [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 47(3): 150-154.
[10]	. [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 47(2): 32-36.
[11]	. [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 38(11): 35-37.
[12]	. [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 38(5): 113-115.
[13]	. [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 38(5): 116-118.
[14]	. [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2007, 36(10): 84-87.
[15]	. [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2007, 36(4): 99-100,116.