Effects of Different Rotation Modes of Sweet Potato on Soil Organic Carbon Components and Carbon Conversion Enzyme Activities

doi:10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2024.02.007

Abstract

Abstract: In order to investigate the effects of different rotation modes of sweet potato on soil organic carbon components and carbon invertase activity，we took sweet potato⁃wheat continuous cropping land for 3 years as the research object,set up four treatments including sweet potato⁃wheat continuous cropping(SWS),sweet potato⁃wheat/sweet potato⁃rapeseed rotation(SWR),sweet potato⁃wheat/corn⁃wheat rotation(SWC),and sweet potato⁃wheat/peanut⁃wheat rotation(SWP)，studied the effects of different rotation modes on soil organic carbon components and carbon invertase activity in 0—20 cm and 20—40 cm soil layers，and explored their correlations.The main results were as follows：compared with the SWS treatment，the SWR,SWC,and SWP treatments could increase soil organic carbon(SOC)，dissolved organic carbon(DOC),particulate organic carbon(POC),readily oxidizable organic carbon(ROC),microbial biomass carbon(MBC)content，and soil sucrase，cellulase,polyphenol oxidase，and peroxidase activity in 0—20 cm and 20—40 cm soil layers. Overall,POC,DOC,ROC and MBC ratios in 0—20 cm and 20—40 cm soil layers were increased. There were also significant differences in soil organic carbon and its component content，as well as carbon conversion enzyme activity among different rotation treatments.In 0—20 cm soil layer,the ROC content and sucrase activity of the SWC treatment were significantly increased by 5.79%,7.56%,and 7.20%,8.71% compared to the SWR and SWP treatments，respectively.The DOC content of the SWR treatment was significantly increased by 5.67% compared to the SWP treatment. The MBC content and peroxidase activity of the SWP treatment were significantly increased by 5.93%,10.35%,and 11.89%,7.02% compared to the SWR and SWC treatments，respectively. In 20—40 cm soil layer,the POC，ROC content and sucrase activity of the SWC treatment were significantly increased by 5.07%,5.42%,and 9.48% compared to the SWP treatment，and the activities of polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase of the SWC treatment were significantly increased by 5. 93% and 7. 14% compared to the SWR treatment，respectively.The DOC content and sucrase activity of the SWR treatment were significantly increased by 5.93% and 5.65% compared to the SWP treatment,respectively. The MBC content of the SWP treatment was significantly increased by 7.56% compared to the SWC treatment,and the activities of polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase of the SWP treatment were significantly increased by 5.56% and 12.30% compared to the SWR treatment，respectively. The result of correlation analysis showed that there was a direct or indirect relationship between the soil organic carbon and its components and carbon conversion enzyme activity under different rotation modes of sweet potato. In summary，the different rotation patterns of sweet potato could increase the content of soil organic carbon and its components，as well as the activity of carbon conversion enzymes.Among them,the SWC(sweet potato⁃wheat/corn⁃wheat rotation)and SWP(sweet potato⁃wheat/peaunt⁃wheat rotation)treatments performed significantly better than the SWR(sweet potato⁃wheat/sweet potato⁃rapeseed rotation)treatment.

Key words: Sweet potato, Rotation, Organic carbon, Enzymatic activity

摘要： 为探究甘薯不同轮作模式对土壤有机碳组分及碳转化酶活性的影响，以甘薯-小麦连作3 a地块为研究对象，设置甘薯-小麦连作（SWS）、甘薯-小麦/甘薯-油菜轮作（SWR）、甘薯-小麦/玉米-小麦轮作（SWC）、甘薯-小麦/花生-小麦轮作（SWP）4个处理，研究不同轮作模式对0~20 cm、20~40 cm土壤有机碳组分及碳转化酶活性的影响，并探讨其相关性。结果表明，与SWS处理相比，SWR、SWC、SWP处理能够提高0~20、20~40 cm 土壤有机碳（SOC）、可溶性有机碳（DOC）、颗粒有机碳（POC）、易氧化有机碳（ROC）、微生物量碳（MBC）含量以及土壤蔗糖酶、纤维素酶、多酚氧化酶、过氧化物酶活性，整体上提升了0~20、20~40 cm土壤POC、DOC、ROC及MBC占比。不同轮作处理土壤有机碳及其组分含量、碳转化酶活性差异也较明显。0~20 cm 土层，SWC 处理ROC 含量较SWR、SWP 处理分别显著提高5.79%、7.56%，蔗糖酶活性分别显著提高7.20%、8.71%；SWR处理DOC含量较SWP处理显著提高5.67%；SWP处理MBC含量较SWR、SWC处理分别显著提高5.93%、10.35%，过氧化物酶活性较SWR、SWC处理分别显著提高11.89%、7.02%。20~40 cm土层，SWC处理POC、ROC含量及蔗糖酶活性较SWP处理分别显著提高5.07%、5.42%、9.48%，多酚氧化酶、过氧化物酶活性较SWR处理分别显著提高5.93、7.14%；SWR处理DOC含量及蔗糖酶活性较SWP处理分别显著提高5.93%、5.65%；SWP处理MBC含量较SWC处理显著提高7.56%，多酚氧化酶、过氧化物酶活性较SWR处理分别显著提高5.56%、12.30%。相关性分析结果表明，不同轮作模式下土壤有机碳及其组分含量与碳转化酶活性有直接或间接关系。综上，甘薯不同轮作模式均可提高土壤有机碳及其组分含量和碳转化酶活性。其中，SWC（甘薯-小麦/玉米-小麦轮作）、SWP（甘薯-小麦/花生-小麦轮作）处理表现明显优于SWR（甘薯-小麦/甘薯-油菜轮作）处理。

关键词: 甘薯, 轮作, 有机碳, 酶活性

CLC Number:

S154
S531

LIU Yajun, WANG Wenjing, LI Min, HU Qiguo, LIU Guangqing, SUN Xiyun, CHU Fengli. Effects of Different Rotation Modes of Sweet Potato on Soil Organic Carbon Components and Carbon Conversion Enzyme Activities[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 53(2): 65-74.

刘亚军, 王文静, 李敏, 胡启国, 刘广卿, 孙喜云, 储凤丽. 甘薯不同轮作模式对土壤有机碳组分及碳转化酶活性的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2024, 53(2): 65-74.

References

［1］陆建珍，汪翔，秦建军，等.我国甘薯种植业时空布局分析及产业发展建议［J］.天津农业科学，2020，26（3）：53⁃62.

LU J Z，WANG X，QIN J J，et al.A report on spatiotemporal layout of sweet potato planting and industry development suggestions in China［J］.Tianjin Agricultural Sciences，2020，26（3）：53⁃62.

［2］刘亚军，王文静，李敏，等.不同除草剂减量与助剂复配对杂草防效、甘薯生长发育和产质量的影响［J］.河南农业科学，2023，52（3）：91⁃100.

LIU Y J，WANG W J，LI M，et al.Effects of different herbicide reduction and adjuvant combination on weed control，growth，yield and quality of sweet potato［J］.Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences，2023，52（3）：91⁃100. ［3］杨航，杜蕾，余鸿华，等.不同肥料和生物菌剂对贵州连作地甘薯产量与土壤养分的影响［J］.贵州农业科学，2023，51（3）：53⁃59.

YANG H，DU L，YU H H，et al.Effects of different fertilizers and biological agents on yield of sweet potato and soil nutrients of continuous cropping land［J］.Guizhou Agricultural Sciences，2023，51（3）：53⁃59.

［4］李敏，刘亚军，王文静，等.施肥方式对连作甘薯田土壤团聚体稳定性及酶活性的影响［J］.江苏农业科学，2023，51（13）：252⁃260.

LI M，LIU Y J，WANG W J，et al.Influences of fertilization measures on soil aggregate stability and enzyme activity of continuous cropping sweet potato field［J］.Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences，2023，51（13）：252⁃260.

［5］汤晓仪.冬季复种轮作缓解甘薯连作障碍的应用调控研究［D］.烟台：烟台大学，2023.

TANG X Y.Study on the apply governance mechanisms of winter replanting rotation to alleviate the cropping obstacles on sweet potato［D］.Yantai：Yantai University，2023.

［6］王磊，王静，张爱君，等.小麦-甘薯轮作长期增施有机肥对碱性土壤固氮菌群落结构及多样性的影响［J］.生态学报，2020，40（16）：5771⁃5782.

WANG L，WANG J，ZHANG A J，et al.Effects of long⁃term organic fertilization on soil diazotrophic community structure and diversity under wheat⁃sweet potato rotation system［J］.Acta Ecologica Sinica，2020，40（16）：5771⁃5782.

［7］乔月静，刘琪，曾昭海，等.轮作方式对甘薯根际土壤线虫群落结构及甘薯产量的影响［J］.中国生态农业学报（中英文），2019，27（1）：20⁃29.

QIAO Y J，LIU Q，ZENG Z H，et al.Effect of rotation on nematode community diversity in rhizosphere soils and

yield of sweet potato［J］.Chinese Journal of Eco⁃Agriculture，2019，27（1）：20⁃29.

［8］刘亚军，王文静，王红刚，等.作物轮作对甘薯田土壤微生物群落的影响［J］.作物杂志，2021（6）：122⁃128.

LIU Y J，WANG W J，WANG H G，et al.Effects of crop rotation on soil microbial community in sweet potato field［J］.Crops，2021（6）：122⁃128.

［9］赵姝.甘薯茎腐病原菌在土壤中的消长规律及轮作对菌量的影响［D］.杭州：浙江大学，2020.

ZHAO S.The growth and decline of sweet potato stem and root rot pathogens in soil and the effect of rotation on the amount of pathogens［D］.Hangzhou：Zhejiang University，2020.

［10］杨滨娟，李新梅，胡启良，等.长江中游不同复种轮作模式的资源利用率及综合效益比较［J］.中国生态农业学报（中英文），2022，30（9）：1501⁃1510.

YANG B J，LI X M，HU Q L，et al.Comparison of resource utilization efficiency and comprehensive benefits among different multiple cropping rotation patterns in the middle reaches of Yangtze River［J］.Chinese Journal of Eco⁃Agriculture，2022，30（9）：1501⁃1510.

［11］HAN L F，SUN K，JIN J，et al.Some concepts of soil organic carbon characteristics and mineral interaction from a review of literature［J］.Soil Biology and Biochemistry，2016，94：107⁃121.

［12］朱长伟，陈琛，牛润芝，等.不同轮耕模式对豫北农田土壤固碳及碳库管理指数的影响［J］.中国生态农业学报（中英文），2022，30（4）：671⁃682.

ZHU C W，CHEN C，NIU R Z，et al.Effects of tillage rotation modes on soil carbon sequestration and carbon pool management index of farmland in northern Henan［J］.Chinese Journal of Eco⁃Agriculture，2022，30（4）：671⁃682. ［13］齐鹏，王晓娇，姚一铭，等.不同耕作方法和施氮量对旱作农田土壤CO₂排放及碳平衡的影响［J］.草业学报，2021，30（1）：96⁃106.

QI P，WANG X J，YAO Y M，et al.Effects of different tillage practices and nitrogen application rate on carbon dioxide emissions and carbon balance in rain⁃fed maize crops［J］.Acta Prataculturae Sinica，2021，30（1）：96⁃106. ［14］胡坤，张红雪，郭力铭，等.烟秆炭基肥对薏苡土壤有机碳组分及微生物群落结构和丰度的影响［J］.中国生态农业学报（中英文），2021，29（9）：1592⁃1603.
HU K，ZHANG H X，GUO L M，et al.Effects of tobacco stalk biochar⁃based fertilizer on the organic carbon fractions and microbial community structure of adlay soil［J］.Chinese Journal of Eco⁃Agriculture，2021，29（9）：1592⁃1603. ［15］何伟，王会，韩飞，等.长期施用有机肥显著提升潮土有机碳组分［J］.土壤学报，2020，57（2）：425⁃434.
HE W，WANG H，HAN F，et al.Effect of long⁃term application of organic manure expanding organic
carbon fractions in fluvo⁃aquic soil［J］.Acta Pedologica Sinica，2020，57（2）：425⁃434.

［16］秦燚鹤，李雪利，王静，等.施肥对植烟土壤有机碳组分及土壤呼吸的影响［J］.土壤通报，2021，52（4）：885⁃894.
QIN Y H，LI X L，WANG J，et al.Effects of fertilization on soil organic carbon fractions and respiration under tobacco cultivation［J］.Chinese Journal of Soil Science，2021，52（4）：885⁃894.

［17］王梦雅，符云鹏，黄婷婷，等.等碳量添加不同有机物料对土壤有机碳组分及土壤呼吸的影响［J］.中国烟草学报，2018，24（2）：65⁃73.
WANG M Y，FU Y P，HUANG T T，et al.Effects of organic material application on organic carbon in and respiration of soil［J］.Acta Tabacaria Sinica，2018，24 （2）：65⁃73.

［18］张鹏鹏，濮晓珍，张旺锋.干旱区绿洲农田不同种植模式和秸秆管理下土壤质量评价［J］.应用生态学报，2018，29（3）：839⁃849.
ZHANG P P，PU X Z，ZHANG W F.Soil quality assessment under different cropping system and straw management in farmland of arid oasis region［J］.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology，2018，29（3）：839⁃849.

［19］李增强，张贤，王建红，等.化肥减施对紫云英还田土壤活性有机碳和碳转化酶活性的影响［J］.植物营养与肥料学报，2019，25（4）：525⁃534.
LI Z Q，ZHANG X，WANG J H，et al.Effect of chemical fertilizer reduction with return of Chinese milk vetch（Astragalus sinicus L.）on soil labile organic carbon and carbon conversion enzyme activities［J］.Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers，2019，25 （4）：525⁃534.

［20］戴伊莎，贾会娟，熊瑛，等.保护性耕作措施对西南旱地玉米田土壤有机碳、氮组分及玉米产量的影响［J］.干旱地区农业研究，2021，39（3）：82⁃90.
DAI Y S，JIA H J，XIONG Y，et al.Impact of conservation tillage measures on maize yield，soil organic carbon and nitrogen components of maize field in rain⁃fed region in southwest China［J］.Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas，2021，39（3）：82⁃90.
［21］叶超，张昀，燕香梅，等.秸秆还田方式和数量对棕壤有机氮活性的影响［J］.土壤通报，2018，49（6）：1383⁃1389.
YE C，ZHANG Y，YAN X M，et al.Effects of straw returning method and quantity on organic nitrogen activity in brown earth［J］.Chinese Journal of Soil Science，2018，49（6）：1383⁃1389.

［22］宁运旺，张辉，许仙菊，等.薯麦轮作体系钾肥全部施于薯季提高甘薯和周年产量［J］.植物营养与肥料学报，2018，24（4）：935⁃946.
NING Y W，ZHANG H，XU X J，et al.Full application of potassium fertilizer in sweet potato to increase tuber and annual yields in sweet potato/wheat rotation［J］.Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers，2018，24（4）：935⁃946. ［23］孙涛，冯晓敏，高新昊，等.多样化种植对土壤团聚体组成及其有机碳和全氮含量的影响［J］.中国农业科学，2023，56（15）：2929⁃2940.
SUN T，FENG X M，GAO X H，et al.Effects of diversified cropping on the soil aggregate composition and organic carbon and total nitrogen content［J］.Scientia Agricultura Sinica，2023，56（15）：2929⁃2940.

［24］罗纨，蔡思成，李印娟，等.江苏沿海垦区暗管排水农田轮作对土壤有机碳的影响模拟［J］.农业工程学报，2022，38（18）：138⁃146.
LUO W，CAI S C，LI Y J，et al.Simulating the effect of crop rotation on soil organic carbon in subsurface drained farmlands in coastal reclamation areas of Jiangsu China［J］.Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering，2022，38（18）：138⁃146.

［25］李文军，彭保发，杨奇勇.长期施肥对洞庭湖双季稻区水稻土有机碳、氮积累及其活性的影响［J］.中国农业科学，2015，48（3）：488⁃500.
LI W J，PENG B F，YANG Q Y.Effects of long⁃term fertilization on organic carbon and nitrogen accumulation and activity in a paddy soil in double cropping rice area in Dongting Lake of China［J］.Scientia Agricultura Sinica，2015，48（3）：488⁃500.

［26］张丽敏，徐明岗，娄翼来，等.土壤有机碳分组方法概述［J］.中国土壤与肥料，2014（4）：1⁃6.
ZHANG L M，XU M G，LOU Y L，et al.Soil organic carbon fractionation methods［J］.Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China，2014（4）：1⁃6.

［27］雷利国，江长胜，郝庆菊.缙云山土地利用方式对土壤轻组及颗粒态有机碳氮的影响［J］.环境科学，2015，36（7）：2669⁃2677.
LEI L G，JIANG C S，HAO Q J.Impacts of land use changes on soil light fraction and particulate organic
carbon and nitrogen in Jinyun Mountain［J］.Environmental Science，2015，36（7）：2669⁃2677.

［28］陈安强，付斌，鲁耀，等.有机物料输入稻田提高土壤微生物碳氮及可溶性有机碳氮［J］.农业工程学报，2015，31（21）：160⁃167.
CHEN A Q，FU B，LU Y，et al.Exogenous organic materials applied to paddy field improving soil microbial biomass C，N and dissolved organic C，N［J］.Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering，2015，31（21）：160⁃167.

［29］陈源泉，隋鹏，严玲玲，等.有机物料还田对华北小麦玉米两熟农田土壤有机碳及其组分的影响［J］.农业工程学报，2016，32（S2）：94⁃102.
CHEN Y Q，SUI P，YAN L L，et al.Effects of different organic wastes incorporation on soil organic carbon and its fraction under wheat⁃maize cropping system in North China Plain［J］.Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering，2016，32（S2）：94⁃102.

［30］关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法［M］.北京：农业出版社，1986.
Guan S Y. Soil enzyme and study method［M］.Beijing：Agricultural Press，1986.

［31］苑广源，MUNYAMPIRWA T，毛丽萍，等.16年保护性耕作措施对粮草轮作系统土壤碳库及稳定性的影响［J］.水土保持学报，2021，35（3）：252⁃258.
YUAN G Y，MUNYAMPIRWA T，MAO L P，et al.Effects of conservational tillage measures on soil carbon pool and stability in a winter forage⁃crop rotation system on the loess plateau of China［J］.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation，2021，35（3）：252⁃258.

［32］杨滨娟，李新梅，胡启良，等.不同轮作休耕模式对稻田土壤有机碳及其组分的影响［J］.华中农业大学学报，2022，41（6）：51⁃58.
YANG B J，LI X M，HU Q L，et al.Effects of rotation and fallow patterns on organic carbon and its components in soil of paddy fields［J］.Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University，2022，41（6）：51⁃58.

［33］方凯，孙丽丽，周昌敏，等.长期秸秆还田对双季稻土壤有机碳组分及碳库管理指数的影响［J］.福建农业学报，2022，37（9）：1216⁃1224.
FANG K，SUN L L，ZHOU C M，et al.Effects of long⁃term spent straw incorporation on organic carbons in soil and carbon pool management at two⁃crop rice fields［J］.Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences，2022，37（9）：1216⁃1224. ［34］王琳，李玲玲，高立峰，等.长期保护性耕作对黄绵土总有机碳和易氧化有机碳动态的影响［J］.中国生态农业学报，2013，21（9）：1057⁃1063.
WANG L，LI L L，GAO L F，et al.Effect of long⁃term conservation tillage on total organic carbon and readily oxidizable organic carbon in loess soils［J］.Chinese Journal of Eco⁃Agriculture，2013，21（9）：1057⁃1063.
［35］周际海，郜茹茹，魏倩，等.旱地红壤不同土地利用方式对土壤酶活性及微生物多样性的影响差异［J］.水土保持学报，2020，34（1）：327⁃332.
ZHOU J H，GAO R R，WEI Q，et al.Effects of different land use patterns on enzyme activities and microbial diversity in upland red soil［J］.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation，2020，34（1）：327⁃332.
［36］决超.甘薯不同轮作模式对土壤生物学特性及理化性质的影响［J］.江苏农业科学，2022，50（3）：116⁃120.
JUE C.Influences of different rotation patterns of sweet potato on soil biological and physicochemical properties［J］.Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences，2022，50（3）：116⁃120.
［37］AKHTAR K，WANG W Y，REN G X，et al.Changes in soil enzymes，soil properties，and maize crop productivity under wheat straw mulching in Guanzhong，China［J］.Soil and Tillage Research，2018，182：94⁃102.
［38］王鹏，郑学博，梁洪波，等.不同施肥模式对植烟棕壤活性有机碳组分和酶活性的影响［J］.华北农学报，2021，36（1）：187⁃196.
WANG P，ZHENG X B，LIANG H B，et al.Effects of different fertilization models on active organic carbon components and enzyme activities of tobacco⁃growing brown soil［J］.Acta Agriculturae Boreali⁃Sinica，2021，36（1）：187⁃196.
［39］周之栋，卜晓莉，吴永波，等.生物炭对土壤微生物特性影响的研究进展［J］.南京林业大学学报（自然科学版），2016，40（6）：1⁃8.
ZHOU Z D，BU X L，WU Y B，et al.Research advances in biochar effects on soil microbial properties［J］.Journal of Nanjing Forestry University（Natural Sciences Edition），2016，40（6）：1⁃8.
［40］李增强，张贤，王建红，等.紫云英施用量对土壤活性有机碳和碳转化酶活性的影响［J］.中国土壤与肥料，2018（4）：14⁃20.
LI Z Q，ZHANG X，WANG J H，et al.Effects of Chinese milk vetch（Astragalus sinicus L.）application rate on soil labile organic carbon and C⁃transformation enzyme activities［J］.Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China，2018（4）：14⁃20.

[1]	ZHANG Licheng, LI Juan, ZHANG Mingqing, GU Zuchao. Cabbage Yield and Nutrient Utilization under Substitution of Organic Manure for Fertilizer in Vegetable‑Rice Rotation in Lateritic Red Soil [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 52(8): 87-95.
[2]	CHEN Han, HU Huiyun, CHENG Jianfeng, HUANG Yingjin, MAO Xiaorong, XU Xiaoming, ZENG Yanhua. Differences in Natural Enrichment Abilities of Elements in Root Tubers of Different Genotypes of Sweet Potato（Ipomoea batatas Lam.） [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 52(7): 24-39.
[3]	WEI Quanquan, GU Xiaofeng, GOU Jiulan, ZHANG Meng, RAO Yong, XIAO Huagui. Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizer Combined with Organic Materials on Microbial Community in Winter Rapeseed⁃Maize Rotation in Yellow Soil [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 52(6): 41-50.
[4]	LIU Yajun, WANG Wenjing, LI Min, HU Qiguo, WANG Honggang, CHU Fengli. Effects of Different Herbicide Reduction and Adjuvant Combination on Weed Control，Growth，Yield and Quality of Sweet Potato [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 52(3): 91-100.
[5]	SHAO Zeqiang, BU Xintong, GOU Qiandong, GUO Xiaoxiao, ZHOU Linyuan, WANG Jingbo, LI Yinghua. Effects of Alcoholic Waste Mash Liquid Organic Carbon Fertilizer on Root Growth，Yield and Quality of Small Tomato [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 52(3): 109-117.
[6]	WANG Cong, LI Ming, QIU Guangwei, WANG Lichun, LIU Lingling, WANG Huaipeng, PANG Ze , TANG Chunshuang, SUN Jiying. Effects of Different Planting Pattern on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties of Heilongjiang Black Soil [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 52(2): 74-83.
[7]	ZHOU Jiahao, CHU Junjie, SUN Wanchun, ZOU Ping, YU Qiaogang, MA Junwei, YANG Jun. Research Progress on the Effect of Organic Carbon on the Formation of Soil Aggregates [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 52(11): 10-20.
[8]	LI Lingyun, HE Ailing, YANG Huanhuan, LIU Gaoyuan, GUO Zhongyi, DU Jun. Effect of Reduction of Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate on Yield and Nitrogen Utilization of Wheat⁃Maize Rotation System in Yellow⁃Cinnamon Soil Area [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 52(11): 21-32.
[9]	NIE Shengwei, ZHANG Qiaoping, PAN Xiuyan, WANG Jianchao, ZHENG Nian, XU Jidong, ZHANG Yuting, CHEN Zhaoxia. Effects of Cattle Manure and Wheat Straw Compost instead of 20% Chemical Fertilizer on Soil Total Nutrients in Plough Layer during Wheat‑Corn Rotation System [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 51(12): 53-62.
[10]	XU Sisi , LÜ Xuemei, ZHOU Meng, SUI Yueyu, JIAO Xiaoguang. Effects of Straw Deep Burial Combined with Nitrogen Fertilizer on Organic Carbon Components and Nutrients in Black Soils [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 51(12): 63-72.
[11]	LIU Yangyang, SONG Jiale, JI Zhixin, ZHANG Kai, QIAO Yake, JIN Hengxing, LIU Yunfeng, SI Zengzhi. Effects of Nitrogen，Phosphorus and Potassium Application Methods and Rates on Agronomic Traits and Yield of Sweet Potato [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 51(11): 21-34.
[12]	CHEN Yue, LIU Huichao, JIA Wenqing, HE Songlin, GUO Yingzi, ZHU Xiaopei, WANG Yanli, DU Xiaohua, WANG Zheng. Effect of Low Temperature Treatment on Nuclear Morphology and Physiological Indexes of Peony Petals [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 51(1): 116-124.
[13]	ZHONG Ziyu, LIN Lizhuo, CUI Peng, LÜ Zunfu, PANG Linjiang, LU Guoquan. Effect of Growth Period on Content (Activity) of Antinutritional Factors in Sweet Potato Tubers [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 50(9): 36-43.
[14]	CHEN Hua, ZHAO Wenjun, WANG Zhengxu, YIN Mei, XUE Kaizheng, HE Zhenghai, CHEN Jianfeng, WANG Zhiyuan, WANG Wei, WANG Yingxue, YANG Yanxian, FU Libo. Effects of Nitrogen Management on Yield，Quality and Nitrogen Utilization of Flue⁃cured Tobacco under Different Rotation Patterns [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 50(9): 87-95.
[15]	TANG Fenfen, YANG Weike, XIE Kun, YUAN Shengyong, SHEN Dengrong, HE Chao, ZHANG Rui, LIU Na. Effect of BmNPV on the Activity of Trehalase and Its Gene Expression of Bombyx mori [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 50(9): 157-162.