Agricultural Resources and Environment

Effects of Frass Manure on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties and Tomato Yield in Greenhouse

Expand
  •  (Department of Agronomy,Resource and Environment,Tianjin Agricultural University,Tianjin 300384,China)

Received date: 2019-05-15

  Online published: 2019-11-15

Abstract

 To explore the applications of frass manure organic fertilizer in agricultural production,three different frass manures( yellow mealworm frass,black soldier fly frass and white-spotted flower chafer frass) and chicken manure were used as experimental materials,to study the effects of different organic manure application on soil pH value,conductivity,soil carbon content,soil enzyme activity and tomato yield.The results showed that,the total carbon and total organic carbon contents of soil treated by three frass manure fertilizer organic were significantly higher than those of chicken fertilizer treatment.Each or ganic fertilizer treatment significantly increased soil nitrate nitrogen,available phosphorus and available potassium content,and the effect of black soldier fly frass treatment was the best.Each organic manure treatment significantly increased soil phosphatase and urease activities,but had no significant effect on soil catalase activity.The white-spotted flower chafer frass treatment had the greatest influence on soil phos phatase and urease activity,which increased by 78.53% and 36.61%,respectively,compared with chick en manure treatment. Phosphatase activity was significantly positively correlated with soil water-soluble to tal carbon and water-soluble total organic carbon content.Urease activity was significantly positively corre lated with soil total carbon,total organic carbon,and water-soluble total organic carbon content,and was extremely significantly positively correlated with soil water-soluble total carbon content.Each organic fer tilizer treatment significantly increased tomato yield,and yellow mealworm frass,black soldier fly frass and white-spotted flower chafer frass treatments increased by 17.37%,12.52% and 18.25%,respectively,compared with chicken manure treatment.

Cite this article

CAI Ruijie, XIAO Yang, WU Xiang, WANG Xiaobo, XU Xiaoyan . Effects of Frass Manure on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties and Tomato Yield in Greenhouse[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2019 , 48(11) : 70 -74 . DOI: 10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2019.11.010

References

[1]黄正团,潘红平.黄粉虫高效养殖技术一本通[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2008.
2]骆洪义,王虹,王琦.黄粉虫粪沙不同用量对油菜生长及品质的影响[J].山东农业科学,2011(8):75-77.
3]刘巧林.黑水虻在奶牛粪便中生长对大肠杆菌的影响[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2008.
4]刘福顺,冯晓洁,席国成,等.白星花金龟幼虫虫粪对樱桃萝卜生长情况的影响[J].湖北农业科学,2018,57(4):44-46,50.
5]易小琳,李酉开,韩琅丰.紫外分光光度法测定土壤硝态氮[J].土壤通报,1983(6):35-40.
6]孙兰香.乙酸铵浸提:火焰光度计法测定土壤速效钾[J].现代农业科技,2008(17):199.
7]丰骁,段建平,蒲小鹏,等.土壤脲酶活性两种测定方法的比较[J].草原与草坪,2008(2):70-72.
8]关松荫.土壤酶及其研究方法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986:294-297.
9]王艳.灌溉方式、生物碳和有机肥对温室土壤碳及酶活性的影响[J].干旱区研究,2016,33(3):461-466.
10]张滕,饶良懿,吕坤珑,等.土壤呼吸影响因素研究进展[J].广东农业科学,2012,39(8):64-67.
11]黄晶,高菊生,张杨珠,等.长期不同施肥下水稻产量及土壤有机质和氮素养分的变化特征[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(7):1889-1894.
12]骆坤,胡荣桂,张文菊,等.黑土有机碳、氮及其活性对长期施肥的响应[J].环境科学,2013,34(2):676-684.
13]STEWART C E,PLANTE A F,PAUSTIAN K,et al.Soil carbon saturation:Linking concept and measurable carbon pools[J].Soil Science Society of American Journal,2008,72(2):379-392.
14]王小利,郭振,段建军,等.黄壤性水稻土有机碳及其组分对长期施肥的响应及其演变[J].中国农业科学,2017,50(23):4593-4601.
15]郭颖,赵牧秋,吴蕊,等.有机肥对设施菜地土壤-植物系统硝酸盐迁移累积的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2008,27(5):1831-1835.
16]杨丽娟,李天来,周崇峻.塑料大棚内长期施肥对菜田土壤磷素组成及其含量影响[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(5):205-208.
17]党廷辉,张麦.有机肥对黑垆土养分含量、形态及转化影响的定位研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,1999,17(4):1-4.
18]ALBISCH R,CANET R,POMANES F,et al.Microbial biomass conteat and enzymatic activities after the applieation of organic amendments to a horticulhural soil[J].Bioresource Technology,2000,75:43-48.
19]MARCOTE I,HERASADAS T,GARCFNDEZ T,et al.Influence of one or two successive annual applications of organic fertilizers on the enzyme activities of a soil under barley cultivation[J].Bioresource Technology, 2001, 79(2):147-154.
20]CAIRE D G Z,CANO D M S,PALMA R M, et al.Changes in soil enzyme activities following additions of cyanobacyerial biomass and exopolysaccharide[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2000,32(13):1985-1987.
21]何东进,游惠明,肖石红,等.天宝岩长苞铁杉林倒木接触处土壤酶活性变化及其环境效应[J].生态学报,2017,37(1):118-126.
22]朱海强,李艳红,李发东.艾比湖湿地典型植物群落土壤酶活性季节变化特征[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(4):1145-1154.
23]王彦峰,王兵,肖波,等.陕北黄土高原藓结皮的7 种土壤酶活性及其剖面分布特征[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2017,45(3):161-169.
24]王冠玉,吕世凡,吕成群,等.广西 5 种人工林地土壤微生物数量及土壤酶活性分析[J].河北农业大学学报,2017,40(1):43-47.
25]关松荫.土壤酶与土壤肥力[J].土壤通报,1980(6):41-44.
26]马宁宁,李天来,武春成,等.长期施肥对设施菜田土壤酶活性及土壤理化性状的影响[J].应用生态学报,2011,21(7):1766-1771.
27]甄丽莎,谷洁,高华,等.秸秆还田与施肥对土娄土酶活性的影响[J].西北农业学报,2012,21(6):196-201.
28]刘佳斌,李传宝,王宏燕.秸秆还田不同处理方式对黑土微生物数量和土壤酶活性的影响[J].安徽农业学报,2012,40(9):5285-5287.
Outlines

/