Crop Cultivation & Genetic Breeding

 Correlation Analysis of Hypocotyl Length and Root Length at Seedling Stage with Main Agronomic Traits and Quality Traits at Mature Stage in Brassica napus

Expand
  •  (Crop Designing Center,Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Zhengzhou 450002,China)

Received date: 2019-05-30

  Online published: 2019-11-15

Abstract

 In order to dissect the relationship between hypocotyl length,root length at seedling stage and main agronomic traits and quality traits at maturity stage of Brassica napus,125 varieties (lines) of B.na pus were planted indoors and in field for investigating their agricultural traits and quality traits.Correlation and gray relational grade analyses were conducted among various traits.Results showed that the variation coefficients of erucic acid content and glucosinolate content were larger,susceptible to environmental im pact,while the variation coefficients of oil content,plant height were smaller and heritability was higher.The hypocotyl length and the root length at seedling stage was positively correlated with each other. The root length at seedling stage was significantly negative correlated with lodging grade.The length of hypo cotyl and root at seedling stage showed positive correlation with main quality traits and hypocotyl length was positivly correlated with erucic acid content(P<0.05) .All the results indicated that when the roots of the seedlings were more developed,the lodging resistance and quality traits were better at maturity,and the hypocotyl length and root length at seedling stage could be used as important reference indexes for breeding B.napus with lodging resistance and high quality.

Cite this article

LU Dandan, LI Baoquan, AN Sufang, HOU Jinna .  Correlation Analysis of Hypocotyl Length and Root Length at Seedling Stage with Main Agronomic Traits and Quality Traits at Mature Stage in Brassica napus[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2019 , 48(11) : 54 -61 . DOI: 10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2019.11.008

References

[1]KARP A,RICHTER G M.Meeting the challenge of food and energy security[J].Journal of Experimental Botany,2011,62(10):3263-3271.
2]FOREIGN AGRICULTURAL SERVICE.United states department of agriculture[EB/OL].Oilseeds:World Markets and Trade.June 2007.http://www.FAS.USDA.GOV.
3]涂金星,张冬晓,张毅,等.我国油菜育种目标及品种审定问题的商榷[J].中国油料作物学报,2007,29(3):350-352.
4]LI Z,FENG L,SHU X,et al.Analysis and thinking on the present situation of rape mechanized production in south china[J].Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research,2010(10):249-252.
5]刘后利.实用油菜栽培学[M].上海:上海科技出版社,1987:256-260,538-539.
6]ZHANG C L,JUN L,LI P Y,et al.Input/output analysis on rapeseed production practices under different cultivation mode[J].Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences,2010,32(1):57-64.
7]YIN Y,WANG H Z.Achievement,problem and scientific policy of rapeseed industry development in China[J].Journal of Agricultural Science & Technology,2012,14(4):1-7.
8]马霓,李玲,徐军,等.甘蓝型油菜抗倒伏性及农艺性状研究[J].作物杂志,2010(6):36-41.
9]王学芳,郑磊,张智,等.甘蓝型油菜抗倒性及其与株型结构的关系研究[J].江西农业学报,2016,28(9):9-13.
10]黄华磊,石有明,周燕,等.重庆地区生态条件下的油菜产量与农艺性状相关性分析[J].南方农业(园林花卉版),2011,5(6):26-28.
11]倪正斌,王陈燕,孙雪辉,等.甘蓝型油菜主要农艺性状相关性及主成分分析[J].江西农业学报,2018,30(3):7-10.
12]陈新军,戚存扣,浦惠明,等.甘蓝型油菜抗倒性评价及抗倒性与株型结构的关系[J].中国油料作物学报,2007,29(1):54-57,62.
13]刘唐兴,官春云.不同密度的油菜根系特征和产量与倒伏之间的相关性初探[J].西南农业学报,2008,21(1):23-25.
14]刘唐兴,官春云.油菜倒伏指数和茎秆生化成分及农艺性状的灰色关联分析[J].中国油料作物学报,2008,30(2):152-156.
15]许凤英,毛群帮,邢丹英,等.油菜抗倒伏性的评价方法研究[J].河南农业科学,2009(11):41-43.
16]李尧臣,顾慧,戚存扣.抗倒伏甘蓝型油菜(Brassica napus L.)根和茎解剖学结构分析[J].江苏农业学报,2011,27(1):36-44.
17]王风敏,薛艳,习光清,等.汉中市气候条件下直播油菜单株产量与重要农艺性状相关性分析[J].现代农业科技,2016(10):14,19.
18]王健胜,梁亚红,侯桂玲,等.油菜育种亲本主要性状相关性及主成分分析[J].中国农学通报,2015,31(27):147-152.
19]关周博,田建华,郑磊,等.适宜机械化栽培的甘蓝型油菜农艺性状与单株产量的相关性分析及耐密油菜育种探讨[J].中国农学通报,2013,29(18):79-83.
20]钟丽.油菜产量与主要性状的灰色关联度分析[J].南方农业学报,2012,43(4):421-424.
21]李明辉,黄继武,杨爱民,等.甘蓝型油菜九种主要性状相关性分析[J].湖北农业科学,2007,46(6):902-903.
22]张子龙,李加纳,唐章林,等.甘蓝型黄籽油菜主要品质性状间的相关性分析[J].中国农学通报,2008,24(7):158-160.
23]高志宏,赵继献,任廷波,等.甘蓝型优质杂交油菜产量与品质性状的相关分析[J].贵州农业科学,2013,41(7):73-77.
24]江满霞,高冰可,卢列健,等.13个油菜品种的农艺性状遗传力和相关性分析[J].浙江农业科学,2015,56(4):472-474.
25]刘唐兴,官春云,肖君泽,等.甘蓝型油菜主茎理化特性与倒伏的关系及抗倒性评价[J].河南农业科学,2007,36(12):40-42,54.
26]唐启义.DPS数据处理系统:实验设计、统计分析及数据挖掘[M].北京:科学出版社,2007.
27]李加纳,邱厥,唐章林,等.甘蓝型油菜主要产量和品质性状的相关分析[J].中国油料作物学报,1990,12(1):11-16.
28]田广文,徐爱遐.低芥酸油菜产量与主要农艺性状相关通径分析[J].陕西农业科学,2007(3):1-3,13.
29]戴祥来,赵继献,向阳,等.甘蓝型杂交油菜收获指数与植株性状的相关分析[J].中国农学通报,2018,34(2):12-17.
30]符明联,张云云,原小燕,等.油菜DH株系主要性状与收获指数的相关及通径分析[J].西南农业学报,2017,30(10):2179-2184.
31]王健,尹武君,刘旦旦.玉米苜蓿间作对黄土坡耕地降雨产流产沙的影响[J].节水灌溉,2011(8):43-46,54.
32]朱宗河,郑文寅,马传喜,等.甘蓝型油菜品质性状相关分析F2品质预测[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35(17):5124-5125,5182.
33]黄华磊,周燕,李艳华,等.长江上游区十七个油菜品种产量性状的相关性分析[J].南方农业,2015(34):46-47,50.
34]赵卫国,王灏,田建华,等.甘蓝型油菜DH群体若干数量性状的遗传分析[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(15):86-91.
35]任义英,崔翠,王倩,等.油菜主花序角果密度及其相关性状的全基因组关联分析[J].中国农业科学,2018,51(6):1020-1033.
36]王健胜,侯桂玲.中国冬油菜品系主要农艺性状相关性分析及油菜育种策略[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(8):94-97.
Outlines

/