Effects of PGPR Combined with Biomass Carbon on Capsicum annuum Growth and Soil Physical and Chemical Properties

doi:10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2022.05.007

Abstract

Abstract: The effects of plant growth‑promoting bacteria（PGPR）and biomass carbon on improving soil conditions and plant productivity have attracted much attention.The purpose of this experiment was to explore the effects of PGPR combined with biomass carbon on pepper（Capsicum annuum）growth and soil microenvironment.Pepper was inoculated with PGPR and non inoculated as a control（NM）under pot conditions，which were combined with biomass carbon of 0，1%，3% and 9% respectively.The results showed that PGPR treatment had a significant growth promoting effect on the growth of pepper，and inoculation treatment significantly improved the number of root tips，root bifurcation，total projected area and total root volume of pepper；at the same time，the content of total nitrogen in soil was increased，while the contents of soil available phosphorus，available potassium and organic matter were decreased. Under the treatment of 3% biomass carbon，the activities of dehydrogenase，acid phosphatase，catalase and polyphenol oxidase in pepper root soil inoculated with PGPR increased by 16.2%，4.5%，28.2% and 28.3% respectively compared with the control treatment；the contents of soil microbial biomass carbon and biomass nitrogen were 1.6 and 1.2 times those of the non inoculated control，respectively.Inoculation of PGPR and application of biomass carbon at the same time could significantly increase the number of soil bacteria and actinomycetes and reduce the number of fungi. Binary analysis of variance showed that the interaction of different biomass carbon addition and different inoculation treatments had a very significant impact on the aboveground dry mass of pepper and fungal content，had a significant impact on microbial biomass carbon，and had no significant impact on other indicators. The results above show that PGPR combined with biomass carbon could promote plant growth by increasing soil related enzyme activity and soil nutrient content，improving plant root and microbial environment，and the treatment effect of PGPR combined with 3% biomass carbon is the best.

Key words: , Plant growth?promoting rhizobacteria；Biomass carbon；Pepper；Root system；Microorganism；Soil physical and chemical property

摘要： 为探究植物根围促生细菌（Plant growth‑promoting rhizobacteria，PGPR）配施生物质炭对辣椒生长和土壤微环境的影响，盆栽条件下设置对辣椒接种PGPR以及不接种对照（NM）并分别配施生物质炭0、1%、3%、9%共8个处理。结果表明，PGPR处理对辣椒生长具有显著的促生效应，接种PGPR处理显著改善辣椒的根尖数、根分叉数、根系总投影面积和根系总体积，同时增加土壤中全氮含量，降低土壤速效磷、速效钾和有机质含量；3%生物质炭添加量下，接种PGPR处理的辣椒根系土壤中脱氢酶、酸性磷酸酶、过氧化氢酶、多酚氧化酶活性分别比对照增加了16.2%、4.5%、28.2%、28.3%，土壤微生物生物量碳和生物量氮含量分别是相应不接种对照的1.6、1.2倍；接种PGPR并施加生物质炭，可显著增加土壤细菌和放线菌数量，降低真菌数量；方差分析结果表明，不同生物质炭添加量与接种PGPR处理的交互作用对辣椒地上干质量、真菌数量影响极显著，对微生物生物量碳影响显著，对其余指标无显著影响。综上，PGPR配合生物质炭能够通过提高土壤相关酶活性和土壤养分含量，改善植物根系和微生物环境，
从而促进植物生长，其中以PGPR配施3%生物质炭处理效果最优。

关键词: 根围促生细菌, 生物质炭, 辣椒, 根系, 微生物, 土壤理化性质

CLC Number:

S641.3

DAI Yurong, LI Yunhong, MU Liqiang, WU jin. Effects of PGPR Combined with Biomass Carbon on Capsicum annuum Growth and Soil Physical and Chemical Properties[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 51(5): 62-70.

代玉荣, 李云红, 穆立蔷, 吴进. 根围促生细菌配施生物质炭对辣椒生长和土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2022, 51(5): 62-70.

Figures/Tables 7

References

［1］麻坤，刁钢.化肥对中国粮食产量变化贡献率的研究［J］.植物营养与肥料学报，2018，24（4）：1113‑1120.
MA K，DIAO G.Research on the contribution rate of fertilizer to grain yield in China［J］.Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science，2018，24（4）：1113‑1120.
［2］崔林丽，史军，杨引明，等.长江三角洲气温变化特征及城市化影响［J］.地理研究，2008，27（4）：775‑786.
CUI L L，SHI J，YANG Y M，et al.Temperature change characteristics and its influence by urbanization in the Yangtze River Delta［J］.Journal of Resources and Ecology，2008，27（4）：775‑786.
［3］刘敏，孙经国，徐兴良.土壤元素失衡是导致高寒草甸退化的重要诱因［J］.生态学杂志，2020，39（8）：2574‑2580.
LIU M，SUN J G，XU X L.Imbalance of soil elements drives the degradation of alpine grasslands［J］.Chinese Journal of Ecology，2020，39（8）：2574‑2580.
［4］司鹏飞，王建中，王忠武.长期大量施肥对保护地土壤质量的影响及防治对策［J］.北方园艺，2016（1）：200‑203.
SI P F，WANG J Z，WANG Z W.Influence of a large number of fertilization for long time on soil quality and its
countermeasures［J］.Northern Horticulture，2016（1）：200‑203.
［5］DEFEZ R，ANDREOZZI A，ROMANO S，et al.Bacterial IAA‑delivery into medicago root nodules triggers a balanced stimulation of C and N metabolism leading to a biomass increase［J］.Microorganisms，2019，7（10）：403‑412.
［6］NGUMBI E，KLOEPPER J.Bacterial‑mediated drought tolerance：Current and future prospects［J］.Applied Soil Ecology，2016，105：109‑125.
［7］MAHMOOD M，RAHMAN Z A，SAUD H M，et al.Responses of banana plantlets to rhizobacteria inoculation under salt stress condition［J］.American‑Eurasian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture，2009，3（3）：502‑508.
［8］MARYA M，SAFDARIAN H，ASKARI G，et al.Halophile plant growth‑promoting rhizobacteria induce salt tolerance traits in wheat seedlings（Triticum aestivum L.）［J］.Pedosphere，2020，30（5）：110‑119.
［9］黄文茂，易伦，彭思云，等.PGPR复合菌剂对辣椒生长及根际土壤微生物结构的影响［J］.中国土壤与肥料，2020（1）：195‑201.
HUANG W M，YI L，PENG S Y，et al.Effect of PGPR compound bacterial agents on growth of chilli and changes of soil microbial structure［J］.Soils and Fertilizers Sciences in China，2020（1）：195‑201.
［10］梁建根，张炳欣，喻景权，等.植物根围促生细菌（PGPR）对黄瓜生长及生理生化特性的影响［J］.浙江大学学报（农业与生命科学版），2007，33（2）：202‑206.
LIANG J G，ZHANG B X，YU J Q，et al.Effects of plant‑growth promoting rhizobacteria on growth and physiological activities of cucumber［J］.Journal of Zhejiang University（Agriculture and Life Sciences），2007，33（2）：202‑206.
［11］韩光，张磊，邱勤，等.复合型PGPR和苜蓿对新垦地土壤培肥效果研究［J］.土壤学报，2011，48（2）：405‑411.
HAN G，ZHANG L，QIU Q，et al.Effects of PGPR and alfalfa on soil building of newly‑reclaimed land［J］.Acta Pedologica Sinica，2011，48（2）：405‑411.
［12］CHO W R，OH M，CHUNG W，et al.A Study on the characteristics of the biochar by hydrothermal carbonization with food waste［J］.Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment，2016，21（1）：22‑27.
［13］HALE L， LUTH M， CROWLEY D.Biochar characteristics relate to its utility as an alternative soil inoculum carrier to peat and vermiculite［J］.Soil Biology & Biochemistry，2015，81（81）：228‑235.
［14］JOSEPH S，GRABER E R，CHIA C，et al.Shifting paradigms：Development of high‑efficiency biochar fertilizers based on nano‑structures and soluble components［J］.Carbon Management，2013，4（3）：323‑343.
［15］张登晓，周惠民，潘根兴，等.城市园林废弃物生物质炭对小白菜生长、硝酸盐含量及氮素利用率的影响［J］.植物营养与肥料学报，2014，20（6）：1569‑1576.
ZHANG D X，ZHOU H M，PAN G X，et al.Effect of municipal green waste biochar addition on the growth，nitrate content and nitrogen use efficiency of greenhouse pakchoi［J］.Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science，2014，20（6）：1569‑1576.
［16］张功臣，陈建美，赵征宇，等.生物质炭对设施连作土壤性质及黄瓜生长和产量的影响［J］.土壤通报，2018，49（3）：659‑666.
ZHANG G C，CHEN J M，ZHAO Z Y，et al.Effects of biochar application on soil characteristics，growth and yield of cucumber under continuous cropping［J］.Chinese Journal of Soil Science，2018，49（3）：659‑666.
［17］李佳.生物质炭-促生菌菌剂的制备及其对水稻苗期促生效果研究［D］.杭州：浙江大学，2018.
LI J.Preparation of biomass carbon growth promoting bacteria and its effect on rice seedling［D］.Hangzhou：Zhejiang University，2018.
［18］沈萍，陈向东. 微生物学实验［M］.4 版. 北京：高等教育出版社，2007.
SHEN P，CHEN X D.Microbiology experiment［M］.4th ed. Beijing：Higher Education Press，2007.
［19］鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析［M］.3 版.北京：中国农业出版社，2000.
BAO S D.Soil and agricultural chemistry analysis［M］.3rd ed. Beijing：China Agricultural Press，2000.
［20］王岩，黄波，苏晓，等.植物根际促生细菌型生物肥料研究综述［J］.山东林业科技，2013，43（3）：92‑95.
WANG Y，HUANG P，SU X，et al.Review on the research of plant rhizosphere growth promoting bacterial biofertilizer［J］.Journal of Shandong Forestry Science and Technology，2013，43（3）：92‑95.
［21］王会会，李前正，李亚华，等.根际促生菌对沉水植物的促生效应及其与沉积物氮磷赋存形态的关系［J］.水生生物学报，2021，45（2）：299‑307.
WANG H H，LI Q Z，LI Y H，et al.The effect of PGPR on submerged macrophyte and its relationship with the sediment nitrogen and phosphorus forms［J］.Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica，2021，45（2）：299‑307.
［22］GEISSELER D，HORWATH W R，JOERGENSEN R G.Pathways of nitrogen utilization by soil microorganisms：A review ［J］.Soil Biology and Biochemistry，2011，42（12）：2058‑2067.
［23］宋时丽，吴昊，黄鹏伟，等.秸秆还田土壤改良培肥基质和复合菌剂配施对土壤生态的影响［J］.生态学报，2021，41（11）：4562‑4576.
SONG S L，WU H，HUANG P W，et al.Effects of total straw incorporation combined with soil modified fertilizer substrate and compound microbial agent on soil ecology and wheat yield［J］.Acta Ecologica Sinica，2021，41（11）：4562‑4576.
［24］SUN D，MENG J，XU E G.Microbial community structure and predicted bacterial metabolic functions in biochar pellets aged in soil after 34 months：A section of agriculture，ecosystems and environment［J］.Applied Soil Ecology，2016，100（3）：135‑143.
［25］KHAVAZI K，REJALI F，SEGUIN P.Effects of carrier，sterilisation method，and incubation on survival of Bradyrhizobium japonicum in soybean（Glycine max L.）inoculants［J］.Enzyme and Microbial Technology，2007，41（7）：780‑784.
［26］李影，李斌，刘芳，等.生物炭配施有机菌肥对豫中烤烟生长与产量及品质的影响［J］.河南农业大学学报，2019，53（1）：34‑41.
LI Y，LI B，LIU F，et al.Effects of bio‑bacteria‑fertilizer combined with biochar on growth，yield and quality of flue‑cured tobacco in central Henan Province［J］.Journal of Henan Agricultural University，2019，53（1）：34‑41.
［27］赵柏霞，潘凤荣，王薇，等.生物菌剂对樱桃的促生效应及根际细菌群落的影响［J］.沈阳农业大学学报，2018，49（3）：286‑292.
ZHAO B X，PAN F R，WANG W，et al.Effects of biological agent on promoting mahaleb growth and rhizospheric bacterial community［J］.Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University，2018，49（3）：286‑292.
［28］ORHAN E，ESITKEN A，ERCISLI S.Effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria （PGPR） on yield，growth and nutrient contents in organically growing raspberry［J］.Scientia Horticulturae，2006，111（1）：38‑43.
［29］ABBASPOOR A，ZABIHI H R，MOVAFEGH S.The efficiency of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria（PGPR） on yield and yield components of two varieties of wheat in salinity condition［J］.American‑Eurasian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture，2009，3（4）：824‑828.
［30］韩丽珍，刘畅，周静.接种促生菌对花生根际土壤微生物及营养元素的影响［J］.基因组学与应用生物学，2019，38（7）：3065‑3073.
HAN L Z，LIU C，ZHOU J.Effects of inoculation with growth‑promoting bacteria on peanut rhizosphere soil microorganism and nutrient elements［J］.Genomics and Applied Biology，2019，38（7）：3065‑3073.
［31］王欢欢，任天宝，元野，等.生物质炭与氮肥配施对植烟土壤微生物量碳，氮和碳氮比的影响［J］.中国农学通报，2017，33（12）：52‑57.
WANG H H，REN T B，YUAN Y，et al.Combined application of biomass charcoal and nitrogen fertilizer：Effects on microbial biomass C，microbial biomass N and C/N in tobacco soil［J］.Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin，2017，33（12）：52‑57.

[1]	LI Haiyong, LI Mengyu, GAO Chuang, XU Hao, YIN Guihong, DONG Chunhao, NIU Jishan, LI Qiaoyun. Correlation Analysis between the Resisitance of Wheat to Black Point and Leaf Blight at Seedling Stage Caused by Bipolaris sorokiniana [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 52(8): 96-104.
[2]	GAO Panpan, LI Guoyu, LIU Ruowei, WEI Yujing, FENG Haojie, LOU Yanhong, WANG Hui, YANG Quangang, ZHUGE Yuping, PAN Hong. Effects of Different Modifiers on NH₃ Volatilization and N₂O Emission in Saline Soils [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 51(10): 1-8.
[3]	ZHANG Jian, CHEN Jianhua, SUN Yongqiang, DING Shifu, ZHENG Yongtao, DONG Shengjun. Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield Components of Different Tree Crowns of Armeniaca sibirica [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 51(1): 107-115.
[4]	WANG Zicheng, YANG Shuo, GUAN Yang, LIU Baodong. Comparative Study on Gametophyte Development of Phyllitis japonica under Cd²⁺ and Pb²⁺ Stress [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 50(9): 128-134.
[5]	QIN Maomao, LIU Yanxi, ZHANG Kun, ZHAO Mengqi, ZHOU Zhengfu, WU Zhengqing, CHEN Feng, LEI Zhensheng. Effect of Late Spring Coldness on Quality of High-Quality Strong Gluten Wheat Zhengmai 366 [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 50(3): 42-48.
[6]	LIU Lu, WAN Weijie, ZHENG Tongwen, LONG Xinyu, SUN Zhengxiang, ZHOU Yi. Control Effect of Burkholderia pyrrocinia YZU-S377 on Cotton Verticillium Wilt and Its Growth Promotion Function [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 50(3): 91-96.
[7]	PENG Chenglin, YUAN Jiafu, JIA Ping’an, SI Guohan, XU Xiangyu, ZHAO Shujun, LI Jinhua. Effects of Long-term Integrated Rice-crayfish Model on Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Direct-seeding Rice under Different Nitrogen Application Rates [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 49(4): 15-21.
[8]	XU Zhimin, LIU Yanzhen, CHEN Lin, WU Jianfang, LIU Lian, DING Guochang. Effects of Copper and Zinc Combined Stress on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of 8 Ornamental Grasses [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 49(3): 129-137.
[9]	WU Hongqi, LIN Biying, LI Caixia, LIU Xu, ZHANG Zikun, ZHONG Luming. Evaluation of Salt Tolerance of Different Eggplant Varieties at Seedling Stage [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 49(10): 92-100.
[10]	LIU Yulan, CHEN Dianyuan, ZHENG Yushi, FAN Wenzhong, LI Yongpeng, SUN Shan, WANG Tao, ZHAI Wenbo. Effects of Interaction of Cutting Seedlings with Planting Density on Growth and Yield of Spring Maize [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 48(9): 7-13.
[11]	WANG Liuhang, PENG Ting, XIONG Jiabao, WANG Haibin, LIU Ye, ZHANG Jing, WANG Daizhang, TENG Yongzhong, ZHAO Quanzhi. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Vascular Bundle Structure in First Internode of Super Hybrid Ｒice [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 48(9): 14-22.
[12]	ZHOU Yaxing, ZHOU Wei, XU Shoujun, WANG Zhenguo, LI Ziwen, CHANG Yuxin, LIU Peng, ZHANG Yongliang. Correlation Analysis between the Sugar Brix of Stalk and Agronomic Traits，Biological Yield of Sweet Sorghum in Different Growth Stages [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 48(9): 46-53.
[13]	SHEN Yunting, SUO Yanyan, ZHANG Xiang, SI Xianzong, YU Qiong, YU Hui, SUN Yanmin, WU Jihua, CHEN Lei. Evaluation of Soil Nutrient Status and Suggestions for Fertilization in Main Peanut Production Areas of Henan Province [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 48(9): 67-73.
[14]	YANG Shaowu, ZHANG Xiaoming, GUO Haiye, QUAN Yunchou, FU Yang, CHEN Guohua. Control Effect of Different Pesticides on Main Diseases and Pest Insects in Perennial Ｒice Field [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 48(9): 98-102.
[15]	JIANG Hui, YUAN Xin, FENG Naixin, ZHANG Jing, LI Yanmin, FU Zhenzhu, GAO Jie, DONG Xiaoyu, WANG Huijuan, WANG Limin, ZHANG Hechen. Analysis of Polyploidy Induction and Initial Phenotype Difference in Petunia axillaris [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 48(9): 111-116.