植物保护

31.9%吡虫啉·戊唑醇悬浮种衣剂对河南省主播小麦生长的影响

  • 苏旺苍 ,
  • 郝红丹 ,
  • 徐洪乐 ,
  • 孙兰兰 ,
  • 周蒲 ,
  • 吴仁海 ,
  • 薛飞
展开
  • (河南省农业科学院植物保护研究所,河南 郑州 450002)
苏旺苍(1981-),男,河南内黄人,助理研究员,博士,主要从事作物病虫草害综合防治研究。E-mail:suwangcang@126com

收稿日期: 2019-06-23

  网络出版日期: 2019-12-15

基金资助

国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFD0200503);河南省农业科学院优秀青年科技基金项目(2018YQ17)

Effects of 31.9% Imidacloprid·Tebuconazole Suspension Seed Coating Agent on Growth of the Main Wheat Varieties in Henan Province

Expand
  • (Institute of Plant Protection,Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Zhengzhou 450002,China)

Received date: 2019-06-23

  Online published: 2019-12-15

摘要

为了解31.9%吡虫啉·戊唑醇悬浮种衣剂对河南省主播小麦品种的安全性,对河南省主播小麦品种进行31.9%吡虫啉·戊唑醇悬浮种衣剂包衣示范试验,调查其对小麦发芽及生长发育的影响。结果显示,31.9%吡虫啉·戊唑醇悬浮种衣剂在推荐剂量(4 mL 31.9%吡虫啉·戊唑醇悬浮种衣剂包衣1 kg小麦种子)下使用对供试小麦品种均无不良影响。31.9%吡虫啉·戊唑醇悬浮种衣剂处理可明显提高秋乐2122、周麦27、西农979、豫麦158、矮抗58、济麦4号、开麦21、泛麦8号、丰德存麦1号的出苗率,其出苗率分别为90%、98%、89%、96%、96%、70%、83%、98%、81%,未经药剂处理的出苗率分别为75%、86%、82%、72%、89%、62%、76%、78%、69%;基本苗数调查结果显示,31.9%吡虫啉·戊唑醇悬浮种衣剂处理对各小麦品种出苗无不良影响;31.9%吡虫啉·戊唑醇悬浮种衣剂处理可明显提高豫麦158、百农207、天民198等的分蘖数、地上鲜质量,经药剂处理后分蘖数分别为5、4、4个,未经药剂处理的分蘖数分别为4、3、3个,经药剂处理后地上鲜质量分别为8.31、8.25、7.10 g,未经药剂处理的地上鲜质量分别为6.62、6.11、5.72 g,说明该种衣剂对小麦植株的生长有促进作用;31.9%吡虫啉·戊唑醇悬浮种衣剂处理可明显提高西农979、周麦22等的根数(经药剂处理后根数分别为11、10条,未经药剂处理的根数分别为9、8条)、根长(经药剂处理后根长分别为11.8、11.4 cm,未经药剂处理的根长分别为10.2、10.1 cm)、地下鲜质量(经药剂处理后地下鲜质量分别为0.91、0.65 g,未经药剂处理的地下鲜质量分别为0.81、0.45 g),说明该种衣剂对小麦根系生长有促进作用。综上,31.9%吡虫啉·戊唑醇悬浮种衣剂在推荐剂量(4 mL31.9%吡虫啉·戊唑醇悬浮种衣剂包衣1 kg小麦种子)下使用对供试的河南省主播小麦品种安全,且对小麦生长有一定的促进作用。

本文引用格式

苏旺苍 , 郝红丹 , 徐洪乐 , 孙兰兰 , 周蒲 , 吴仁海 , 薛飞 . 31.9%吡虫啉·戊唑醇悬浮种衣剂对河南省主播小麦生长的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2019 , 48(12) : 89 -97 . DOI: 10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2019.12.013

Abstract

To study the safety of 31.9% imidacloprid·tebuconazole suspension seed coating agent on the main wheat varieties in Henan Province, demonstration test of wheat seed dressing with 31.9% imidacloprid·tebuconazole suspension seed coating agent was conducted,and the effects on the growth and development of wheat were investigated.The result showed that 31.9% imidacloprid·tebuconazole suspension seed coating agent had no harm to the tested wheat at the recommended dosage(31.9%imidacloprid·tebuconazole suspension seed coating agent:Wheat seed was 4 mL∶1 kg).Wheat seed dressing with 31.9% I imidacloprid·tebuconazole suspension seed coating agent could improve the emergence rates of Qiule 2122,Zhoumai 27,Xinong 979,Yumai 158,Aikang 58,Jimai No.4,Kaimai 21,Fanmai No.8 and Fengdecunmai No.1 significantly,the emergence rates were 90%,98%,89%,96%,96%,70%,83%,98% and 81%,respectively,while the emergence rates without 31.9% imidacloprid·tebuconazole suspension seed coating agent were 75%,86%,82%,72%,89%,62%,76%,78% and 69%,respectively.The investigation of the basic seedling number showed that seed dressing with 31.9% imidacloprid·tebuconazole suspension seed coating agent had no adverse effect on the emergence of the tested wheat varieties.Wheat seed dressing with 31.9% imidacloprid · tebuconazole suspension seed coating agent could improve the tillering number and the fresh weight of the overground part of Yumai 158,Bainong 207 and Tianmin 198,indicating that it could promote the growth of wheat plants.The tillering numbers were 5,4 and 4,respectively,while the tillering numbers without 31.9% imidacloprid·tebuconazole suspension seed coating agent were 4, 3 and 3, respectively.The fresh weights of the overground part were 8.31,8.25 and 7.10 g,respectively,while the fresh weight of the overground part without 31.9% imidacloprid·tebuconazole suspension seed coating agent were 6.62,6.11 and 5.72 g,respectively.The root number,root length and the fresh weight of the underground part of Xinong 979 and Zhoumai 22 were improved after seed dressing with 31.9% imidacloprid·tebuconazole suspension seed coating agent,indicating that it could promote the growth of wheat root.The root numbers were 11 and 10,respectively,while the root numbers without 31.9% imidacloprid·tebuconazole suspension seed coating agent were 9 and 8,respectively.The root lengths were 11.8 and 11.4 cm,respectively,while the root lengths without 31.9% imidacloprid·tebuconazole suspension seed coating agent were 10.2 and 10.1 cm,respectively.The fresh weights of the underground part were 0.91 and 0.65 g,respectively,while the fresh weights of the underground part without 31.9% imidacloprid·tebuconazole suspension seed coating agent were 0.81 and 0.45 g,respectively.In summary, it can be seen that 31.9% imidacloprid·tebuconazole suspension seed coating agent is safe for the main wheat varieties in Henan Province dressing with the recommended dosage(31.9% imidacloprid·tebuconazole suspension seed coating agent ∶Wheat seed was 4 mL∶1 kg),and has a certain promotion effect on the growth of wheat.

参考文献

1韩松,全鑫,郭小奇,.4种杀虫剂拌种对小麦蚜虫的防治效果及其安全性研究[J.河南农业科学,2018,475):85-88,98.

2]王莹洁.70%噻虫嗪种子处理可分散粉剂防治小麦蚜虫田间药效试验[J.现代农业科技,201813):108.

3]王华,李金叶,陈茂娟.4种药剂防治小麦蚜虫田间药效对比试验[J.安徽农学通报,2018,2413):70-71.

4]魏金中.小麦主要病虫害的发生与防治[J.现代农业科技,201312):119,123.

5]魏会廷,李俊,汤永禄,.防蚜拌种剂对小麦种子萌发的影响[J.种子,2015,3411):77-79.

6]刘爱芝,李素娟,韩松.吡虫啉拌种对小麦蚜虫的控制效果及增产作用研究初报[J.河南农业科学,200511):65-66.

7]朱芳云.小麦播前药剂拌种实用技术[J.河南农业,201725):52.

8]余晓江,陈安娜,朱叶芹.种子处理剂现状及存在问题分析[J.农药科学与管理,2017,385):11-14.

9]俞扬凤,刘坚宏,陈国祥.立克秀拌种对小麦发芽的影响[J].作物杂志,20033)1920

10魏会廷,李俊,汤永禄,.戊唑醇拌种对不同小麦品种种子萌发的影响[J.种子,2018,378):27-30.

11]姜威,黄志宽,高波,.不同药剂对小麦种子蚜虫及纹枯病的防治效果研究[J.现代农业科技,20171):96-97.

12]刘青,刘春潮,任照国,.吡虫啉与戊唑醇处理种子防治小麦病虫害效果[J.中国植保导刊,2013,3312):64-65. 

13]李春清,王家刚,黄家祥,.60%吡虫啉悬浮种衣剂+6%戊唑醇悬浮种衣剂对小麦病虫害防治效果[J.湖北植保,20143):1-2,5.[14REYNOLDS M,FOULKES M J,SLAFER G A,et al.Raising yield potential in wheatJ.Journal of Experimental Botany,2009,607):1899-1918.

15]沈常超,唐文伟,曾东强,.河南省不同区域麦田主要杂草群落防治药剂筛选[J.河南农业科学,2017,4610):86-91.

16]朱统泉,吴大付.河南小麦生产现状分析[J.陕西农业科学,2014,601):78-81.

17]张瑞红.河南省小麦供给现状、问题及对策[J.河南农业科学,2011,4012):65-68.

18]王西成,赵虹,曹廷杰,.2014年河南省小麦品种发展趋势及利用建议[J.河南农业科学,2014,439):11-17.

19]李朝苏,汤永禄,吴春,.药剂拌种对小麦出苗及病虫防控效果的影响[J.西南农业学报,2011,246):2197-2201.

20]路子云,李建成,刘文旭,.优拌悬浮种衣剂拌种对小麦蚜虫控制效果及小麦生长发育的影响[J.河北农业科学,2015,194):39-41,45.

21]田体伟,张梦晗,赵丽鑫,.戊唑醇种衣剂对小麦种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J.种子,2014,3312):66-69.

22]于勇谋,张金良,岳瑾,.吡虫啉与戊唑醇包衣处理小麦种子的效果[J.中国农技推广,2017,3312):62-64.

23]刘爱芝,杨艳春.吡虫啉拌种对小麦种子萌发和生长效应的影响[J.河南农业科学,200911):84-86.

文章导航

/