作物栽培·遗传育种

移栽期和采收期对豫中烤烟上六片叶经济性状和品质特性的影响

  • 高真真 ,
  • 李建华 ,
  • 杨明坤 ,
  • 段卫东 ,
  • 顿松阳 ,
  • 陈小龙 ,
  • 何冰 ,
  • 史宏志
展开
  • (1.河南农业大学 国家烟草栽培生理生化研究基地,河南 郑州 450002;2.河南省烟草公司许昌市公司,河南 许昌 461000;3.河南中烟工业有限责任公司,河南 郑州 450017)
高真真(1993-),女,河南项城人,在读硕士研究生,研究方向:烟草栽培生理。E-mail:2411316935@qq.com 李建华为同等贡献作者

收稿日期: 2019-06-17

  网络出版日期: 2019-10-15

基金资助

河南省烟草公司许昌市公司科技项目(201841100240044)

 Effects of Transplanting Time and Harvesting Time on Economic Characters and Quality Characteristics of Upper Six Leaves of Flue-cured Tobacco in Central Henan

Expand
  •  ( 1.National Tobacco Cultivation & Physiology & Biochemistry Research Center,Henan Agricultural University,Zhengzhou 450002,China; 2.Xuchang Branch of Henan Provincial Tobacco Company,Xuchang 461000,China; 3.China Tobacco Henan Industrial Limited Corporation,Zhengzhou 450017,China)

Received date: 2019-06-17

  Online published: 2019-10-15

摘要

为探究移栽期和采收期对烤烟上六片叶经济性状和质量特色的影响,以主栽烤烟品种中烟100为材料,设计不同移栽期与采收期的栽培试验,对烤烟上六片叶经济性状、感官品质等进行测定并分析。结果表明,移栽期和采收期极显著影响上六片烟叶的经济性状,且二者存在极显著的互作效应,移栽期对产量、产值的影响大于采收期,而采收期对上六片烟叶上等烟比例、单叶质量以及均价影响较大,4月25日—5月5日移栽,产量、产值较高,采收期延迟6、12 d均价差异不显著但显著高于其他处理,且上等烟比例比正常采收分别显著提高10.66%、15.39%。移栽期与上六片烟叶的浓香型特色密切相关,移栽期不晚于5月5日有利于烤烟上六片叶浓香型特征的彰显,4月15日—5月5日移栽时,随移栽期延迟,上六片烟叶的钾氯比增加,燃烧性较好,中性致香气成分含量均在4月25日—5月5日较高;采收期对上六片烟叶质量的影响较大,采收期延迟,上六片烟叶的蛋白质含量、淀粉含量、糖碱比下降,且在延迟12 d采收时趋于适宜值,上六片烟叶的感官品质整体均呈升高趋势,以延迟12 d采收质量最佳,中性致香成分总量整体表现为显著增加。综合分析,移栽期为4月25日—5月5日、延迟采收6~12 d时,上六片烟叶的经济性状表现较好,浓香型特征明显,品质较优。

本文引用格式

高真真 , 李建华 , 杨明坤 , 段卫东 , 顿松阳 , 陈小龙 , 何冰 , 史宏志 . 移栽期和采收期对豫中烤烟上六片叶经济性状和品质特性的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2019 , 48(10) : 54 -63 . DOI: 10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2019.10.009

Abstract

 Field experiment was carried out using Zhongyan 100,the main cultivar as material,to investigate the effects of transplanting time and harvesting time on economic characters and quality characteristics of upper six leaves of flue-cured tobacco.The results showed that the transplanting time and harvesting time significantly affected the economic traits of upper six leaves,and there was a very significant interaction effect.The effect of transplanting time on yield and output value was greater than that of harvesting time,while the harvesting time had a greater influence on the proportion of superior  tobacco,single leaf weight and average price of upper six leaves.Transplanting from April 25 to May 5 gave rise to higher yield and output value.Delaying harvest by 6 d and 12 d resulted in no difference in average price,but it was significantly higher than other treatments,with the proportion of superior tobacco increased significantly by 10.66% and 15.39% respectively compared with the normal harvest.The transplanting time was closely related to strong-aroma style of upper six flue-cured tobacco leaves,and the transplanting time no later than May 5 was beneficial to the display of the strong-aroma style of upper six leaves.With the delay of the transplanting time from April 15 to May 5,the potassium-chlorine ratio of upper six leaves increased,and the flammability was better.The content of neutral aroma components was highest when transplanting tobacco from April 25 to May 5.The harvesting time had a great influence on the quality of upper six leaves,as harvesting time delayed,the protein content,starch content,sugar-alkali ratio of upper six leaves decreased,and tended to be optimum when the harvesting time was delayed for 12 days.The sensory quality of upper six leaves showed an increasing trend as a whole as harvesting time delayed,and was the best under a delay of 12 days with significant increase of total amount of neutral aroma components.Comprehensive analysis showed that transplanting from April 25 to May 5 and harvesting with 6-12 days delayed were conducive to improvement of economic characters,quality,and the display of strong-aroma style of upper six tobacco leaves in central Henan.

参考文献

1]孙建锋,刘霞,李伟,等.不同生态条件下烤烟化学成分的相似性研究[J].中国烟草科学,2006,(3):22-24.
2]张慢慢,邵惠芳,许自成,等.烤烟产量与气候因子的关系分析[J].河南农业科学,2016,45(7):34-38.
3]史宏志,邸慧慧,赵晓丹,等.豫中烤烟烟碱和总氮含量与中性香气成分含量的关系[J].作物学报,2009,35(7):1299-1305.
4]侯玉虹,陈传永,郭志强,等.作物高产群体干物质积累动态模型的构建及生长特性分析[J].玉米科学,2008,16(6):90-95.
5]史宏志,刘国顺.浓香型特色优质烟叶形成的生态基础[M].北京:科学出版社,2016.
[6]张喜峰,张立新,高梅,等.不同移栽期对陕南烤烟氮钾含量、光合特性及经济性状的影响[J].中国烟草科学,2013,34(4):20-24.
7]陈永明,陈建军,邱妙文.施氮水平和移栽期对烤烟还原糖及烟碱含量的影响[J].中国烟草科学,2010,31(1):34-36,40.
8]杨亚,朱列书,朱静娴,等.移栽期对烤烟生长发育及品质的影响[J].作物研究,2011,25(2):179-183.
9]高真真,刘扣珠,史宏志,等.移栽期和采收期对豫中烤烟上六片叶发育期温度指标的影响[J].中国烟草科学,2019,40(1):49-57.
10]王瑞新.烟草化学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2003:250-286.
11]冀浩,刘永强,杨欣,等.不同移栽期对临沧烤烟品质的影响[J].河南农业科学,2015,44(6):51-55.
12]杨园园,杨军杰,史宏志,等.浓香型产区不同移栽期气候配置及对烟叶质量特色的影响[J].中国烟草学报,2015,21(2):40-52.
13]刘德玉,李树峰,罗德华,等.移栽期对烤烟产量、质量和光合特性的影响[J].中国烟草学报,2007,13(6):40-46.
14]蔡宪杰,王信民,尹启生.成熟度与烟叶质量的量化关系研究[J].中国烟草学报,2005,11(4):42-46.
15]李国强,汤亮,张文宇,等.不同株型小麦干物质积累与分配对氮肥响应的动态分析[J].作物学报,2009,35(12):2258-2265.
16]张宾,赵明,董志强,等.作物高产群体LAI动态模拟模型的建立与检验[J].作物学报,2007,33(4):612-619.
17]阳苇丽,王龙宪,许自成,等.烤烟钾、氯含量及钾氯比与烟气指标的关系分析[J].江西农业学报,2011,23(12):109-112.
18]张永刚,宋朝鹏,李常军,等.熵权模糊综合评价法在烤烟感官质量评价中的应用[J].中国烟草学报,2010,16(6):33-36.
19]薛琳,朱启法,季学军,等.皖南烤烟烟叶化学成分与感官品质的相关性[J].烟草科技,2016,49(11):26-32.
20]左天觉.烟草的生产、生理和生物化学[M].上海:远东出版社,1991.
21]朱尊权.烟叶的可用性与卷烟的安全性[J].烟草科技,2000(8):3-6.
22]冉法芬,王海涛,许自成.不同移栽期和土壤类型对烤烟品种NC89品质的影响[J].江西农业学报,2009,21(11):24-26.
 
文章导航

/