玉米IDL 基因家族的全基因组鉴定及在根系发育中的表达分析

doi:10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2026.01.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在全基因组水平鉴定玉米IDL［IDA（Inflorescence deficient in abscission）‐like］基因家族成员，分析其理化性质、系统进化和启动子顺式作用元件，并通过实时荧光定量PCR（qRT-PCR）技术检测ZmIDL基因在玉米主根的不同部位（分生区、伸长区、成熟区）、不同组织（中柱、皮层）及激素、干旱处理下的表达模式，为揭示IDL 基因在玉米根系发育中的作用奠定基础。结果表明，鉴定出7 个ZmIDL 基因（ZmIDL1—7），分属于3个亚组，7个ZmIDL基因分布在6条染色体上，且彼此之间不存在共线性关系，其启动子区域存在激素、非生物胁迫响应顺式作用元件。表达模式数据分析结果表明，ZmIDL基因在根部皮层、种子糊粉层和花丝中高表达，并且响应干旱、低温、高温、盐、UV等多种非生物胁迫。qRT-PCR结果显示，郑单958根皮层中ZmIDL1/3/4/6基因的表达量极显著高于中柱，而ZmIDL2和ZmIDL7基因则在中柱中表达量更高，ZmIDL5基因没有表达；随着萌发时间延长，ZmIDL1基因表达量在先玉335主根成熟区、分生区和伸长区均逐渐提高，ZmIDL6基因表达量仅在先玉335主根成熟区逐渐提高，在先玉335和郑单958主根分生区和伸长区无明显变化。当主根成熟区生长素转运受阻时，ZmIDL1/6基因表达量显著升高，而转运恢复后其表达量显著降低。此外，ZmIDL6和ZmIDL1基因表达量在干旱胁迫初期玉米（郑单958 16 h、先玉335 8 h）主根成熟区提高。推测ZmIDL6 和ZmIDL1 基因可能协同调控玉米根系发育，并响应干旱胁迫。

关键词: 玉米, IDL基因, 全基因组鉴定, 根系发育, 进化分析, 基因表达, 生长素

Abstract: The IDL［IDA（inflorescence deficient in abscission）‐like］gene family members were identified in maize at the whole‐genome level，and their physicochemical properties，phylogenetic evolution，and cis‐elements in promoter region were analyzed.The expression patterns of ZmIDL genes in different regions（meristem zone，elongation zone，maturation zone） and tissues（stele，cortex） of the primary root，as well as under hormone and drought treatments were detected using quantitative real‐time PCR（qRT‐PCR），which would lay a foundation for revealing the role of IDL gene in maize root development.The results showed that seven ZmIDL genes（ZmIDL1—7）were identified，classified into three subgroups and distributed across six chromosomes without collinearity.Their promoter regions contained cis‐elements in response to hormones and abiotic stresses.Expression analysis revealed that ZmIDL genes were highly expressed in the root cortex，pericarp|aleurone and silk，and responded to multiple abiotic stresses including drought，low/high temperature，salt and UV.qRT‐PCR analysis revealed that ZmIDL1/3/4/6 expression levels were significantly higher in Zhengdan 958 root cortex than those in stele，while ZmIDL2 and ZmIDL7 expression levels were higher in stele；ZmIDL5 did not express.As the germination time extended，ZmIDL1 expression level gradually increased in maturation zone，meristem zone and elongation zone of primary root of Xianyu 335，while ZmIDL6 expression level increased only in the maturation zone of primary root of Xianyu 335，with no significant change in meristem zone and elongation zone of primary root of Zhengdan 958 and Xianyu 335.When auxin transport was blocked in the maturation zone of primary root，ZmIDL1/6 expression level significantly increased，but significantly decreased after transport recovery.Under early drought stress（16 h for Zhengdan 958，8 h for Xianyu 335），ZmIDL6 and ZmIDL1 expression levels increased in the maturation zone of primary root.These findings suggest that ZmIDL6 and ZmIDL1 may synergistically regulate maize root development and respond to drought stress.

Key words: Maize, IDL genes, Genome‐wide identification, Root development, Evolutionary analysis, Gene expression, Auxin

中图分类号:

S513

李艳华, 李春阳, 吴晓林, 王伟, 刘辉. 玉米IDL 基因家族的全基因组鉴定及在根系发育中的表达分析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2026, 55(1): 52-64.

LI Yanhua, LI Chunyang, WU Xiaolin, WANG Wei, LIU Hui. Genome‐Wide Identification of IDL Gene Family in Maize and Its Expression Analysis during Root Development[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 55(1): 52-64.

图/表 9

参考文献

［1］CASIMIRO I，BEECKMAN T，GRAHAM N，et al.Dissecting Arabidopsis lateral root development［J］.Trends in Plant Science，2003，8（4）：165‐171.

［2］YU P，GUTJAHR C，LI C J，et al. Genetic control of lateral root formation in cereals［J］.Trends in Plant Science，2016，21（11）：951‐961.

［3］JANSEN L，ROBERTS I，DE RYCKE R，et al.Phloem‐associated auxin response maxima determine radial positioning of lateral roots in maize［J］.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B（Biological Sciences），2012，367 （1595）：1525‐1533.

［4］PÉRET B，DE RYBEL B，CASIMIRO I，et al. Arabidopsis lateral root development：An emerging story［J］. Trends in Plant Science，2009，14（7）：399‐408.

［5］CASIMIRO I，MARCHANT A，BHALERAO R P，et al.Auxin transport promotes Arabidopsis lateral root initiation［J］.The Plant Cell，2001，13（4）：843‐852.

［6］KEERTHANA K，RAMAKRISHNAN M，AHMAD Z，et al. Root‐derived small peptides：Key regulators of plant development，stress resilience，and nutrient acquisition［J］. Plant Science，2025，354：112433.

［7］FEDOREYEVA L I. Molecular mechanisms of regulation of root development by plant peptides［J］.Plants，2023，12（6）：1320.

［8］BUTENKO M A，PATTERSON S E，GRINI P E，et al.INFLORESCENCE DEFICIENT IN ABSCISSION controls floral organ abscission in Arabidopsis and identifies a novel family of putative ligands in plants［J］.The Plant Cell，2003，15（10）：2296‐2307.

［9］VIE A K，NAJAFI J，LIU B，et al. The IDA/IDA‐LIKE and PIP/PIP‐LIKE gene families in Arabidopsis：Phylogenetic relationship，expression patterns，and transcriptional effect of the PIPL3 peptide［J］. Journal of Experimental Botany，2015，66（17）：5351‐5365.

［10］MATSUBAYASHI Y. Posttranslationally modified small‐peptide signals in plants［J］.Annual Review ofPlant Biology，2014，65：385‐413.

［11］STENVIK G E，TANDSTAD N M，GUO Y F，et al. The EPIP peptide of INFLORESCENCE DEFICIENT IN

ABSCISSION is sufficient to induce abscission in Arabidopsis through the receptor‐like kinases HAESA and HAESA‐LIKE2［J］.The Plant Cell，2008，20（7）：1805‐1817.

［12］HUSSAIN S，WANG W，AHMED S，et al. PIP2，an auxin induced plant peptide hormone regulates root and hypocotyl elongation in Arabidopsis［J］. Frontiers in Plant Science，2021，12：646736.

［13］崔俊美，魏家萍，董小云，等. PIP/PIPL：一类调控植物逆境响应和发育的植物内源性多肽［J］.生物技术通报，2023，39（3）：35‐42.

CUI J M，WEI J P，DONG X Y，et al. PIP/PIPL：A kind of endogenous plant peptide regulating plant stress response and development［J］.Biotechnology Bulletin，2023，39（3）：35‐42.

［14］GUBERT C M，LILJEGREN S J. HAESA and HAESA‐LIKE2 activate organ abscission downstream of NEVERSHED and EVERSHED in Arabidopsis flowers［J］. Plant Signaling & Behavior，2014，9（7）：e29115.

［15］KUMPF R P，SHI C L，LARRIEU A，et al. Floral organ abscission peptide IDA and its HAE/HSL2 receptors control cell separation during lateral root emergence［J］. PNAS，2013，110（13）：5235‐5240.

［16］LI B H，KAMIYA T，KALMBACH L，et al. Role of LOTR1 in nutrient transport through organization of spatial distribution of root endodermal barriers［J］.Current Biology，2017，27（5）：758‐765.

［17］薛瑾，吴健，卢秀香，等. 烟草磺肽素（PSK）基因家族鉴定及抗旱功能分析［J］.中国烟草科学，2024，45（3）：77‐85.

XUE J，WU J，LU X X，et al. Analysis of sulfopeptin（PSK）gene family and drought resistance in tobacco［J］. Chinese Tobacco Science，2024，45（3）：77‐85.

［18］CHIEN P S，NAM H G，CHEN Y R. A salt‐regulated peptide derived from the CAP superfamily protein negatively regulates salt‐stress tolerance in Arabidopsis［J］. Journal of Experimental Botany，2015，66（17）：5301‐5313.

［19］HOU S G，WANG X，CHEN D H，et al. The secreted peptide PIP1 amplifies immunity through receptor‐like kinase 7［J］. PLoS Pathogens，2014，10（9）：e1004331.

［20］ VIE A K，NAJAFI J，WINGE P，et al. The IDA‐LIKE peptides IDL6 and IDL7 are negative modulators of stress responses in Arabidopsis thaliana［J］.Journal of Experimental Botany，2017，68（13）：3557‐3571.

［21］GUO C，WANG Q，LI Z Y，et al. Bioinformatics and expression analysis of IDA‐like genes reveal their potential functions in flower abscission and stress response in tobacco（Nicotiana tabacum L.）［J］.Frontiers in Genetics，2021，12：670794.

［22］LI C Y，LI Y Y，SONG G S，et al. Gene expression and expression quantitative trait loci analyses uncover natural variations underlying the improvement of important agronomic traits during modern maize breeding［J］.The Plant Journal，2023，115（3）：772‐787.

［23］YU P，HOCHHOLDINGER F，LI C J. Plasticity of lateral root branching in maize［J］. Frontiers in Plant Science，2019，10：363.

［24］CHEN C J，CHEN H，ZHANG Y，et al. TBtools：An integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data［J］. Molecular Plant，2020，13（8）：1194‐1202.

［25］LESCOT M，DÉHAIS P，THIJS G，et al. PlantCARE，a database of plant cis‐acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences［J］. Nucleic Acids Research，2002，30（1）：325‐327.

［26］BAILEY T L，JOHNSON J，GRANT C E，et al. The MEME suite［J］.Nucleic Acids Res，2015，43（W1）：W39‐W49.

［27］WALLEY J W，SARTOR R C，SHEN Z X，et al.Integration of omic networks in a developmental atlas of maize［J］. Science，2016，353（6301）：814‐818.

［28］WATERS A J，MAKAREVITCH I，NOSHAY J，et al.Natural variation for gene expression responses to abiotic stress in maize［J］. The Plant Journal，2017，89 （4）：706‐717.

［29］FORESTAN C，AIESE CIGLIANO R，FARINATI S，et al.Stress‐induced and epigenetic‐mediated maize transcriptome regulation study by means of transcriptome reannotation and differential expression analysis［J］. Scientific Reports，2016，6：30446.

［30］VENTIMILLA D，VELÁZQUEZ K，RUIZ‐RUIZ S，et al. IDA（INFLORESCENCE DEFICIENT IN ABSCISSION）‐like peptides and HAE（HAESA）‐like receptors regulate corolla abscission in Nicotiana benthamiana flowers［J］.BMC Plant Biology，2021，21 （1）：226.

［31］YING P Y，LI C Q，LIU X C，et al. Identification and molecular characterization of an IDA‐like gene from Litchi，LcIDL1，whose ectopic expression promotes floral organ abscission in Arabidopsis［J］. Scientific Reports，2016，6：37135.

［32］LIU C，ZHANG C Y，FAN M X，et al. GmIDL2a and GmIDL4a，encoding the inflorescence deficient in abscission‐like protein，are involved in soybean cell wall degradation during lateral root emergence［J］.International Journal of Molecular Sciences，2018，19 （8）：2262.

［33］VILLAO‐UZHO L， CHÁVEZ‐NAVARRETE T，PACHECO‐COELLO R，et al. Plant promoters：Their identification， characterization， and role in gene regulation［J］. Genes，2023，14（6）：1226.

［34］MEIER M，LIU Y，LAY‐PRUITT K S，et al.Auxin‐mediated root branching is determined by the form of available nitrogen［J］. Nature Plants，2020，6 （9）：1136‐1145.

［35］SHITIZ K，MISHRA P，RAITHATHA A，et al.Napropamide affects auxin levels and modulates gene expression of auxin transporters in Solanum lycopersicum（tomato）［J］. Advances in Weed Science，2025，43：e020250051.

［36］杨梅，李延红，付艺萍，等. 枳和甜橙中AUX/LAX和PIN基因家族全基因组鉴定及在缺硼与生长素处理下的表达分析［J］. 江西农业大学学报，2025，47（4）：932‐946.

YANG M，LI Y H，FU Y P，et al. Genome‐wide identification，bioinformatics analysis and expression analysis under boron deficiency and auxin application conditions of AUX/LAX and PIN gene families in Citrus［J］. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis，2025，47（4）：932‐946.

［37］STOECKLE D，THELLMANN M，VERMEER J E.Breakout‐lateral root emergence in Arabidopsis thaliana［J］.Current Opinion in Plant Biology，2018，41：67‐72.

［38］RASHOTTE A M，BRADY S R，REED R C，et al.Basipetal auxin transport is required for gravitropism in roots of Arabidopsi［s J］. Plant Physiol，2000，122（2）：481‐490.

［39］王鑫. 拟南芥小分子多肽IDL6调控免疫和发育的分子机制［D］. 泰安：山东大学，2016.

WANG X. The molecularmechanismof small molecule polypeptide IDL6 in regulationof plant immunity and development of Arabidopsis thaliana［D］. Taian：Shandong University，2016.

[1]	李川, 张盼盼, 张美微, 郭涵潇, 穆蔚林, 牛军, 乔江方. 玉米花粉中响应高温胁迫circRNA 的筛选及其功能初探[J]. 河南农业科学, 2026, 55(1): 26-39.
[2]	卫晓轶, 刘志成, 张战辉, 史大坤, 李方杰, 洪德峰, 孙佩, 李知, 魏锋. 基于miRNA-mRNA 整合分析技术的玉米自交系新4095 耐旱分子机制初探[J]. 河南农业科学, 2026, 55(1): 40-51.
[3]	苟瑞丽, 舍杨梦斐, 方晶莹, 田浩天, 马国林, 田蕾, 罗成科. 不同耐盐碱类型水稻根系对盐碱胁迫的生理及分子响应差异[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(9): 34-42.
[4]	李海伦, 高宁宁, 郭姚淼, 孙东玲, 王月玲, 谢夔熙, 李鹏飞, 段世享, 赵卫星, 杨森. 甜瓜TCP 基因家族全基因组的鉴定与表达分析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(9): 127-140.
[5]	王子明, 张玉阳, 王子琦, 凡卓, 袁虹霞, 杨雪, 李洪连, 施艳. 河南省夏玉米新品种对南方锈病的抗性评价及抗锈基因检测[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(7): 107-115.
[6]	张吉立, 张铁, 刘振平, 王鹏, 龙怀玉. 尿囊素对土壤水分干湿交替下玉米磷吸收与转运的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(6): 55-62.
[7]	张震, 周磊, 陈永忠, 张英, 王瑞, 缪子琪, 李志钢, 龙玲, 许彦明. 缓释肥施用量对油茶容器苗生长及养分含量的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(6): 63-71.
[8]	田野, 杨培华, 阳婷倩, 刘小岑, 刘奕清, 王娇, 胡海骏, 蒋昕晨, 张万顺, 朱永兴. 外源纳米硅对盐胁迫下辣椒种子萌发的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(6): 110-120.
[9]	李华, 陈亮, 杜雷超, 刘斌, 张生银, 张景辉. 保水剂施用深度和施用量对玉米光合特性、产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(5): 10-22.
[10]	张盼盼, 邵运辉, 李春华, 穆蔚林, 郭涵潇, 李川, 张美微, 赵双锁, 胡彦奇, 韩琳琳, 乔江方. 氮锌配施对不同锌效率玉米品种不同粒位籽粒矿质元素累积分配的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(4): 11-26.
[11]	田媛, 张鹏钰, 李丰, 王东勇, 付锦州, 戎亚思, 高桐梅. 低氮胁迫下芝麻差异表达ERF基因的鉴定及SiERF08基因的表达分析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(4): 37-46.
[12]	龙菊烟, 卢圣菲, 田姣, 牛熙, 陈霞, 黄世会, 冉雪琴, 王嘉福. 5 个猪种DKK2基因结构变异DKK2-I1-sv89的多态性研究[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(4): 129-135.
[13]	邓聪, 马璐, 汪青松, 付健, 王玉凤, 杨克军. 芽孢杆菌对盐碱胁迫下玉米种子萌发及生理生化特性的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(3): 20-30.
[14]	杨永辉, 邬佳宾, 张运红, 张廷昊5, 高翠民, 韩伟锋, 潘晓莹, 何方, Devotha G. NYAMBO, 罗宁. 长期深松和增施有机肥对降水氢、氧同位素分布和玉米水分利用的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(12): 1-12.
[15]	张美微, 郭涵潇, 赵双锁, 胡彦奇, 穆蔚林, 张盼盼, 李川, 郑飞, 乔江方. 灌水量和施氮量对不同密度下玉米干物质积累与产量的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(12): 13-22.